Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Global Chat Network Linking System - Welcome All! | http://www.ircglobal.org/relay/
- Topic set by [email protected] on Tue Nov 22 2011 09:16:57 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)
- 01:33 Transfuta -_-
- 01:34 Transfuta will someone just utter a word
- 01:34 Transfuta my ears are ringing
- 01:34 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] sure
- 01:35 Transfuta Aaaah, i hear a human voice!
- 01:35 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] more or less
- 01:36 Transfuta lol. how impersonal IRC is.
- 01:36 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] it's a world of its own
- 01:36 Transfuta prove to me that you are not merely figments of my imagination -Sollipsis
- 01:37 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] heh
- 01:37 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] prove to yourself that you really exist
- 01:37 Transfuta for all i know, i could be incredibly deranged, banging my fingers out in a psychiatric examination tiled room
- 01:38 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] or that your entire thought/memory reference archive wasn't create 5 minutes ago
- 01:38 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] created*
- 01:38 Transfuta :| the very thought of it makes me cringe....
- 01:38 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] there's no way to know with absolute certainty
- 01:40 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and since time is forever fleeting, it's never really the a present moment.... by the time you consider 'the prsent moment' it's later
- 01:40 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and still fleeting
- 01:40 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the present moment* - the "a"
- 01:40 Transfuta remembers a strange theory: Movement from one point to another is always impossible, for you always have to travel half the distance of half the distance......
- 01:42 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] our preception of "the present moment" is actually our memory of the very recent past in conjunction with our anticipation of the very near future
- 01:42 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] there is no genuine "present" IMO
- 01:42 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] it's an illusion
- 01:43 Transfuta there is no present because whatever you do is in reference to the immediate past, eh
- 01:43 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but since the past no longer exists, and conce the future doesn't yet exist... if the present as well doesn't exist, do we really exist?
- 01:43 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] conce = since
- 01:44 Transfuta will go to sleep pondering
- 01:44 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] lol
- 01:44 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] enjoy
- 01:44 Transfuta well, if we never met our end in the past
- 01:45 Transfuta and if we haven't reached the future yet
- 01:45 Transfuta hmmm >.<
- 01:45 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] then, another question to ponder is: a fact that something was, presumably lasts forever.... but where is such a fact retained?
- 01:46 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] right
- 01:46 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] andnthere's no present
- 01:46 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] er and there's no present
- 01:46 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] so what's left?
- 01:46 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] nothing i can think of
- 01:47 Transfuta the past is defined by the present though
- 01:47 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] that's correct
- 01:47 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the present is a culmination of the past
- 01:48 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but if the present can't exist because of time's perpetual state of fleeting onward, how can there be anything?
- 01:48 Transfuta idk, fast forward until the sun becomes a white dwarf, and our fleeting thoughts will be no more :)
- 01:49 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] seems true enough
- 01:50 Transfuta Doolittle in Pygmalion: The only position in life with any spice left in it is a dustman
- 01:51 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and if our entire solar system were annihilated tomorrow, did any of earth's history ever really occur?
- 01:51 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and if so, where is the fact of such history reteined?
- 01:51 Transfuta it did, if some entity recorded it and the record still exists
- 01:51 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] retained even
- 01:51 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but if noentity recorded it?
- 01:51 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] what then?
- 01:52 Transfuta zero. nada.
- 01:52 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] when if all perceptionand record where destroyed?
- 01:52 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] then it never happened
- 01:52 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] in that case, at least
- 01:52 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] or did it?
- 01:52 Transfuta it never happened because no more entity in the future is aware of it
- 01:53 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] is there some medium/means/area/thing that retains event records universally?
- 01:53 Transfuta Enter religion.
- 01:53 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] depart religion
- 01:53 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] ;<
- 01:53 Transfuta Exeunt.
- 01:54 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] i'm not religious
- 01:54 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and see it as man's creation alone
- 01:54 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] i'm a determinist as well
- 01:54 Transfuta i can see why, especially when the bible has been rewritten countless times usually with semi-factual eyewitness stories
- 01:54 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] agreed
- 01:55 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] wholeheartedly
- 01:55 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] all written my men and translated over and over from language tolanguage
- 01:55 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] how accurate cansomething like that hope to be
- 01:55 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] not very IMO
- 01:56 Transfuta live every day as if it were your last. literally. I guarantee you'll die a happy man.
- 01:56 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] makes sense to me
- 01:57 Transfuta lol, our base, animal desires never cease to be quenched
- 01:57 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] oops
- 01:57 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] my men = by men
- 01:57 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] we are biologic robots
- 01:58 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] i see all choices (decisions) we make as steadfastly preset by their antecedents
- 01:59 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and no true randomness in the universe
- 01:59 Transfuta fatalistic view much?
- 01:59 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] no
- 01:59 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] deterministic view
- 02:00 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] randomness is just a lable given to event sequences that man connot observe and document
- 02:00 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] label*
- 02:01 Transfuta but.. the act of observing what appears to be random....
- 02:01 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] so each of my typos was here was predetermined 100 years ago (and beyond)
- 02:01 Transfuta is still observing
- 02:01 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] er so each of my typos here was was predetermined 100 years ago (and beyond)
- 02:01 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] as was my apparent dyslexia ;>
- 02:04 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] well, every entity/occurrence/thing that exists is a precise result of that which produced it
- 02:04 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] including out thoughts and decisions
- 02:04 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and thus our actions
- 02:04 Transfuta that's scary to think about, in a way >.<
- 02:04 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] out = our
- 02:04 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] it's not pleasant, agreed
- 02:05 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but how can it be untrue?
- 02:05 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] every occurrence must be a result
- 02:06 Transfuta I can choose not to respond to you, not to hit my return key. But my action of deciding whether or not to respond to you... is triggered by your philosophical questions...
- 02:06 Transfuta Argh this is sorcery
- 02:06 Transfuta tries to escape
- 02:06 Transfuta hotel california
- 02:06 Transfuta you can check out, but you can't really leave
- 02:08 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the thought test woud be to imagine a thing that exists and then removeing one of the contributing factors that allowed it to come to be as it is.... if you remove the factor and the thing is unchanged, then it
- 02:08 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but if the things changes in some way (even a minuscule way), it proves my point
- 02:09 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] things = thing
- 02:11 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and your decision not to respond to me would as well have been triggered by the thoughts that led to it
- 02:11 Transfuta evidently it has been, i'm still pondering :S
- 02:11 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] like, for example, if you thought that mot responding to me would disprove my point
- 02:11 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] not*
- 02:11 Transfuta yeah, that was what i was getting at previously
- 02:12 Transfuta it was triggered by my ability to process your arguments
- 02:12 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the bottom line is everything that happensis a result of cause and effect
- 02:12 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and that's determinsim
- 02:12 Transfuta if you choose to make something random, how can it be random
- 02:13 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] determinism = pure cause and effect
- 02:13 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] it's not
- 02:13 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] there is no real random
- 02:14 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] as i said, random is an excuse people use for lack of information on causation
- 02:14 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but the causation is always there
- 02:15 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] as proven by the fact of the result... ie, the existence of the occurrence or thing
- 02:17 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] if things in our universe really appeard without specific causation (even at subatomic level), we'd all be in trouble
- 02:17 Transfuta thinks of Brownian motion and radioactive decay
- 02:17 Transfuta these processes are considered "random" due to the heisenberg uncertainity principle
- 02:18 G-link15 *parallax*(IRC-GLOBAL) thinks of how much of a quack-job Werner Heisenberg had to have been
- 02:18 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] with his uncertainty principle and all
- 02:19 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] that was the best, and most compelling example of my point: that they label things thaey
- 02:19 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] that was the best, and most compelling example of my point: that they label things thay can't explain as random
- 02:19 Transfuta basically, you can't know for certain the position of an electron or similar particle because as you increase the accuracy of your measurement of the velocity, your accuracy of your momentum measurement decreases
- 02:20 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] yes, but they nonetheless have relative positions, paths, trajectories, etc. at any point in time
- 02:21 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] just because man isnt able to document and track those positions doesn't negate their presence
- 02:21 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] man is being arrogant in says: "becaue we can't see and measure it, it must not exist"
- 02:21 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] er ii mean man is being arrogant in saying: "becaue we can't see and measure it, it must not exist"
- 02:22 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the fact of existence poves specific causality
- 02:22 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the fact of existence proves specific causality
- 02:22 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] even
- 02:22 Transfuta how do you know it exists? ;)
- 02:22 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] i don't
- 02:23 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but it's the most reasonable assessment IMO
- 02:23 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] i may not even exist
- 02:23 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] we can't know anything with absolute certainty
- 02:24 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] all we can do is embrace the most logical views
- 02:24 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] which is what i try to do
- 02:25 Transfuta Yes...from Wired, Sept 2012: ... "But now scientists at the Australian National University have introduced a technique for generating 5.7 billion truly random values per second. They do it by harnessing the fundamental uncertainity of the universe. Their technique measures quantum phenomena in a box completely devoid of photons, where ghostly virtual particle
- 02:25 Transfuta s randomly burble in and out of existence 24/7. "God does not play dice," Einstein famously quipped in response to evidence that randomness rules the cosmos. Luckily, he was wrong". (Wired article by Jonathon Keats).
- 02:25 Transfuta hmm, then i guess they're ignoring the fact
- 02:25 Transfuta that we don't quite fully understand quantum formula ;)
- 02:26 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the values are only "random" because they can't harness/observe/detect/track the causality involved
- 02:27 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but the presence of the values proves there was causality
- 02:27 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] again, it'sman's arrogance as i see it
- 02:29 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] ans Einstein was trying to be accepted by the masses.... so since he knew that most people were religious, he used that famous "god doesn't play dice" phraseology
- 02:29 Transfuta I guess you're right, and it was predetermined that i would chance upon a person like you with a neat worldview :)
- 02:30 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] but Einstein's underlying message was that we live in a deterministic universe
- 02:30 Transfuta mhmm
- 02:30 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] heh
- 02:30 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] could very well be
- 02:30 Transfuta kisses parallax and wanders off to bed, it's getting chilly here :3
- 02:31 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] where are you located?
- 02:31 Transfuta China, timezone UTC +8
- 02:31 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] ah ok
- 02:31 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] cool
- 02:31 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] i'm from the US
- 02:32 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] in Oregon
- 02:32 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] nice chatting with you
- 02:41 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] BTW Transfuta, one of my lines i typed earlier truncated over the relay.... the first part was:
- 02:41 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] the thought test woud be to imagine a thing that exists and then removeing one of the contributing factors that allowed it to come to be as it is.... if you remove the factor and the thing is unchanged,
- 02:41 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] and the cut off part was:
- 02:41 G-link15 [parallax(IRC-GLOBAL)] then it couldn't have been a factor to its existence
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement