Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- REPORT OF REFERENDUM RESULTS.
- SUMMARY.
- The results of the referendum of May 10, 2020, were:
- SUMMARY TABLE A.--Results of the referendum by edition.
- [see table 2 of the full report]
- ----------------------------------------
- | Edition | For | Against | Total |
- | Discord | 4 | 7 | 11 |
- | IRC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- | Matrix | 1 | 1 | 2 |
- | Grand Total | 5 | 8 | 13 |
- ----------------------------------------
- Turnout for all of Toxspace was 34.2%. Graphically represented the turnout is:
- SUMMARY FIGURE I.--Turnout by edition and choice.
- [see table 4 of the full report; rounded to nearest 5% from figures in that table; thickness of bars rounded to nearest multiple of 3]
- ^ y
- |100 -------------------------- --------
- // / / / / / / / /
- |50 |' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '| |' ' '|
- | |- - - - - - - ' ' ' ' ' '| |' ' '|
- | |- - - - - - - ' ' ' ' ' '| |' ' '|
- | |- - - - - - - + ' ' ' ' '| |- - -|
- | |- - - - - - - + ' ' ' ' '| |- - -|
- |25 |- - - - - - - + ' ' ' ' '| |- - -|
- | |- - - - - - - + - - - - -| |- - -|
- | |- - - - - - - + + + + + +| |+ + +|
- | |+ + + + + + + + + + + + +| |+ + +|
- | |+ + + + + + + + + + + + +| |+ + +| x
- |/ /--------------------------------------------->
- 0 10 20 30
- Discord IRC Matrix Toxspace
- X-axis: Number of migrants, each cross, dash, or prime symbol representing 3 (except for weighted average for whole of Toxspace.)
- Y-axis: Turnout, in percent.
- Key:
- _ _ _
- |+| - vote for |-| - vote against |'| - did not vote
- - - -
- THE POPULATION AT THE REFERENDUM.
- The population of Toxspace at the beginning of the referendum, including both active and inactive users, was:
- TABLE 1.--Population of Toxspace, May 10, 2020.
- ------------------------------------------------
- | Edition | Migrant | Non-migrant | Total |
- | Discord | 17* | 3 | 20* |
- | IRC+ | 3 | 0 | 3 |
- | Matrix | 11# | 4 | 15# |
- | Grand Total | 31 | 7 | 38 |
- ------------------------------------------------
- * One resident of the IRC edition, and two residents of the Matrix edition, discounted.
- + The population of the IRC edition was determined by actual presence within the IRC channel at the start of the referendum.
- # Three residents of the Discord edition, and one resident of the IRC edition, discounted.
- RESIDENCE.
- In this report, the definition of the term "residence" is as follows. The forms of that word have a corresponding meaning.
- A "resident" of an edition of Toxspace is any user of that edition who:
- Joined that edition before they joined any other edition, and has since remained there until the beginning of the referendum;
- Holds a position of authority, such as administrator or moderator, on that edition.
- If the two criteria conflict, the latter criterion takes precedence in determining residence.
- ELIGIBILITY.
- All users who were present in Toxspace at the beginning of the referendum, without restriction of age, migrant status, or activity, were eligible to vote.
- RESULTS.
- The referendum was called, and voting began, at midnight EDT (UTC-4) on May 10, 2020. Voting ended the same time the next day, midnight EDT on May 11, 2020.
- The results were:
- TABLE 2.--Results of the referendum by edition.
- [The results are based on edition of voting, which may differ from edition of residence. If a voter voted twice in separate editions, the vote was recorded in their edition of residence]
- ----------------------------------------
- | Edition | For | Against | Total |
- | Discord | 4 | 7* | 11 |
- | IRC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- | Matrix | 1 | 1 | 2 |
- | Grand Total | 5 | 8 | 13 |
- ----------------------------------------
- * One double vote cast by a resident of the Matrix edition discounted.
- TABLE 3.--Results of the referendum by residence.
- ----------------------------------------
- | Edition | For | Against | Total |
- | Discord | 2 | 7 | 9 |
- | IRC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
- | Matrix | 2 | 1 | 3 |
- | Grand Total | 5 | 8 | 13 |
- ----------------------------------------
- See footnote for table 2.
- TURNOUT.
- Though the official report of results is based on table 2, turnout should be calculated by dividing the number of voters by the total population. As the total population, as expressed in table 1, is based on residence, turnout should be calculated based on Table no. 3, not no. 2. It is:
- TABLE 4.-- Turnout by choice and edition.
- [%ages rounded to nearest 1%]
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | Edition | %age of pop. voting for | %age of pop. voting against | %age of pop. voting at all (turnout) |
- | Discord | 10 | 35 | 45 |
- | IRC | 33 | 0 | 33 |
- | Matrix | 13 | 7 | 20 |
- | All of Toxspace | 13 | 21 | 34 |
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FIGURE 1.--Choice of the migrant population.
- [No non-migrant in the Matrix edition voted; two non-migrants in the Discord edition voted no, the other did not vote. Each symbol represents, horizontally, one migrant]
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
- |+ + + + +|- - - - - -|' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '|
- |+ + 5 + +|- - 6 - - -|' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 20' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '|
- |+ P R O +|- C O N - -|' ' ' ' ' ' ' A B S T A I N E D ' ' ' '|
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
- ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS.
- Looking at just the results, a clear mandate against de-Discordization is apparent. Opponents to it outnumber proponents whatever measure is used.
- When turnout is examined, the mandate becomes less obvious. Neither side achieved a majority in any edition. The possible reasons for low turnout are lack of advertising of the referendum and low awareness. It is tempting to discard the unfavorable result because turnout did not reach a majority. That ignores the fact that supporters of de-Discordization had the burden of proof, one they failed to meet.
- The large vote against in the Discord edition is presumably caused by unwillingness among the userbase to migrate somewhere else, insufficient campaigning in favor, and lack of access to arguments for de-Discordization. Future referenda should provide an opportunity for supporters of each option to debate and present their viewpoints.
- The low turnout in the Matrix edition springs, we are sure, not from any want of civic duty among its citizens, but from the fact that it was insufficiently advertised. In addition, while the referendum was mentioned in the topic of the IRC edition, it was not entirely clear what it was on.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment