API tools faq
paste
Lesta

5 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-17 1735 +Jezus H. Christ

Lesta
Jan 17th, 2016
39
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.73 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-17 1735 +Jezus H. Christ
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmqw5nKOVg0&google_comment_id=z13ihp0idmrxxzfql04cj1raenjfw1w4f10
  3. https://pastebin.com/VhB4rQtX
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Jezus H. Christ __ [This is a fairly long reply and I ask you to take a look at an image - I think I understand what's happening.]
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11. He did actually reply and in a detailed way. Don't worry - it only helps our case. If "John Kirszenberg" is an honest person then he is profoundly "colour blind". I use the term "colour blind" to refer to a person who is unable to discern between what is real and pretend.
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. In other words - it simply looks real to him. It does not look at all fake. And because he trusts "NASA" then this effect is amplified. He cannot possibly imagine he lives in a world where such a good outfit like "NASA" could possibly lie about anything.
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19. And because the images he looks at APPEAR REAL to him - he's powerless to resist believing. He is rendered powerless to doubt.
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. This is actually very interesting. I believe that "colour blindness" is a genuine phenomenon that affects all people (we all start out as "colour blind" in the way I have described it).
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27. Here is an example. Please take a look at the following image. "John Kirszenberg" has claimed to me that this is a REAL and GENUINE and AUTHENTIC photo taken by "NASA".
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. He has done a "photo forensic examination" and cannot find anything wrong with it (but nor would he - because you could send him a screenshot of a CGI image and he would be unable to discern if it is fake because there would be nothing to suggest it is!).
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. Please take a look at this image and let me know what you think of it. Remember, to "John Kirszenberg" this looks REAL. (Only a very few people are aware of the "colour blindness" I am talking about):
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41. http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?mission=ISS045&roll=E&frame=40951
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. (Yes, this actually looks genuine to him. He can find no "evidence of tampering" simply because the image is given to us in a form that cannot reveal any tampering. But the point is: it is CLEARLY a fabricated image.)
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53. The problem is that "John Kirszenberg" in addition to being "colour blind" is a LITERAL THINKER. For example, in my video title/description I refer to "Scott Kelly" dropping the mic (I made a pun on the phrase "to drop the ball on something).
  54.  
  55.  
  56.  
  57. And so what "John Kirszenberg" did was examine the footage and found that at no stage did "Scott Kelly" ACTUALLY drop the mic. Therefore it must mean I lied! I said he "dropped the mic" but he never did!
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61. What "John Kirszenberg" has completely overlooked is that "Scott Kelly" let go of the mic and for a moment FUMBLED with it as though he was under gravity. Not that he WAS under gravity - but the REFLEX and INSTINCT was there. Yet we are often told how "astronauts" routinely "forget all about gravity" and are so used to just "leaving things in the air". And if that were true then "Scott Kelly" would not have reacted the way he did. The mic could not have gone anywhere and he could have easily and casually scooped it up again.
  62.  
  63.  
  64.  
  65. But he fumbled rapidly and reflexively for a second which implied he was still thinking "in terms of gravity" (and as I say at the start of the video - the "interview" was being done after 10 months of allegedly being in space).
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69. So this is the problem: "John Kirszenberg" is "colour blind" ("everything looks real" to him) and he TRUSTS "NASA" and pals ("why would they lie? They are the good guys!") and he is a LITERAL THINKER (and so he interprets my words and observations in a very literal way).
  70.  
  71.  
  72.  
  73. If I were to guess I would estimate his IQ to be anywhere between 95 and 105. He is AVERAGE.
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77. Again - all of this is dependent upon him being honest and genuine. If he is honest, genuine and sincere then he simply functioning on a different "wavelength".
  78.  
  79.  
  80.  
  81. Because "it is real" and because "NASA are good" then it MUST mean Lesta is a liar and deceitful. That really must be how he views me (if he is honest and sincere etc.).
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85. Most people are like "John Kirszenberg" and so we have to find a way to reach these people if we ever want to change the world for the better.
  86.  
  87.  
  88.  
  89. __________________________________________
  90. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  91. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  92.  
  93. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  94. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  95.  
  96. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  97. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  98.  
  99. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  100. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!