Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Oct 15th, 2017
178
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 16.88 KB | None | 0 0
  1. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Plato. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of presocratics most of the jokes will go over a typical readers head. There's also Plato's theory of forms, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Aeolic literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Plato truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Plato's existential catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Hemlock," which itself is a cryptic reference to Babylons epic Enuma Elish. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as the old pederast's genius wit unfolds itself on their e-readers screens. What fools.. how I pity them.
  2. And yes, by the way, i DO have a Logos tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the young boys' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid
  3.  
  4.  
  5. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Infinite Jest. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the metaphors will go over a typical reader’s head. There’s also DFW’s nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Slavoj Zizek literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these metaphors, to realise that they’re not just postmodern- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Infinite Jest truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in DFW’s existential catchphrase “And but so” which itself is a cryptic reference to Stirner’s German epic The Ego and His Own. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as DFW’s genius wit unfolds itself on their paperbacks. What fools.. how I pity them.
  6. And yes, by the way, i DO have an Infinite Jest tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the audience pussy only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid
  7.  
  8.  
  9. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Jordan Peterson. The insight is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of the degeneration of western civilization most of the jokes will go over a typical recipiants head. There's also Jordan's chauvnistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal PhIloSoPhY draws exclusively from psychology literature, Carl Jung for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these ramlbings, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about CULTURAL MARXISM. As a consequence, people who dislike Jordan Peterson truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the self-help in Jordan's existential catchphrase "Clean Your Room!" which itself is a cryptic reference to Molyneux's epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those post-modern simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Petersons genius unfolds itself on their computer screens. What fools... how I pity them. And yes by the way, I DO have a Carl Jung tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're willing to have 5 children of my own and no professional ambition beforehand.
  10.  
  11.  
  12. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Gravity’s Rainbow. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewers head. There's also Slothrop’s hedonistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from pre-Socratic literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Gravity’s Rainbow truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Slothrop's existential catchphrase "Fuck it" which itself is a cryptic reference to Sterne’s Irish epic The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Thomas Pynchon’s genius wit unfolds itself on their e-reader screens. What fools.. how I pity them.
  13. And yes, by the way, i DO have a Gravity’s Rainbow tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid
  14.  
  15.  
  16. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Fathers and Sons. The commentary is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of the Russian nobility most of the argument will go over a typical reader's head. There's also Arkady's nihilistic outlook, which is central to his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily from his studies at the University of Petersburg, part of a new cutting edge academic intelligentsia whose radical beliefs alienate his father, Nikolai. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the timelessness of this sense of generational displacement and realise that despite the foreign names and funny hats its as applicable today, in an era where elders struggle with smartphones and post irony, as it was when they struggled with the revolution in philosophy brought on by the enlightenment- it says something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Fathers and Sons truly ARE plebians- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Bazaraov struggling to reconcile love with his nihlism, which itself is a cryptic reference to Kant. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Turgenev's genius unfolds itself as they unfold the book. What fools... how I pity them. And yes by the way, I DO have a hardcopy. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.
  17.  
  18.  
  19. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand mass shootings. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of bullet trajectories most of the rounds will go over a typical victim's head. There's also the shooter's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Elliot Rodger's YouTube videos, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of the suspect, to realize that he's not just funny- he is saying something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike mass shootings truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in the shooter's existencial catchphrase "GOODNIGHT LAS VEGAS," which itself is a cryptic reference to The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as the shooter's genius unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools... how I pity them. And yes by the way, I DO have a YOU CANT DODGE THE RODGE tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.
  20.  
  21.  
  22. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Meditations. The virtue is extremely stoic, and without a solid grasp of western philosophy most of the ideas will go over a typical reader's head. There's also Marcus Aurelius's stoic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Severus's teachings for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these meditations, to realize that they're not just virtuous- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Meditations truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Marcus's ethical quote, "The impediment to action advances action.." which itself is a cryptic reference to the greek epic "The Odyssey" by Homer. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Marcus Aurelius genius unfolds itself in his personal writings. What fools... how I pity them. And yes by the way, I DO have a Stoic tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.
  23.  
  24.  
  25. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand atheism. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Friedrich's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike atheism truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Hawking's existencial catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools... how I pity them. ? And yes by the way, I DO have a Tim and Eric tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.
  26.  
  27.  
  28. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand the Philosophical Investigations. The philosophy is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of the limits of human communication most of the concepts will go over a typical reader’s head. There’s also Wittgensteins's quietist outlook, which is deftly woven into his maxims- his personal philosophy draws heavily from obscure Pyrrhonian texts, for instance. The readers understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these adages, to realise that they are just nonsense- they can't say anything deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Wittgenstein truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in Wittgenstein's existential catchphrase “Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen” which itself is a cryptic reference to the Frege's Sense and Reference. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Wittgenstein's genius wit unfolds itself on their Kindle screens. What fools.. how I pity them.
  29. And yes, by the way, i DO have a duckrabbit tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid.
  30.  
  31.  
  32. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand the L'existentialisme est un humanisme. The philosophy is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of sitting most of your days lounging in Parisian cafés most of the concepts will go over a typical reader’s head. There’s also Sartre's Marxist outlook, which is deftly woven into his maxims- his personal philosophy draws heavily from obscure Celinéan passages, for instance. The readers understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these adages, to realise that they’re not just nonsense- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike the Sartre truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in Sartre's existential catchphrase “L'enfer, c'est les autres" which itself is a cryptic reference to the Das Man in Sein und Zeit. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Sartre's genius wit unfolds itself on their mass-produced Editions Flammarion paperbacks. What fools.. how I pity them.
  33.  
  34.  
  35. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Das Kapital. The philosophy is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of European economics most of the concepts will go over a typical reader’s head. There’s also Marx's political outlook, which is deftly woven into his critiques- his personal philosophy draws heavily from obscure Hegelian texts, for instance. The readers understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these adages, to realise that they’re not just nonsense- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike the Das Kapital truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in Marx's existential catchphrase “What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money” which itself is a cryptic reference to the Old Testament. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Marx's genius wit unfolds itself on their soviet flag-colored paperbacks. What fools.. how I pity them.
  36. And yes, by the way, i DO have a Hammer and Sickle tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid.
  37.  
  38.  
  39. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand the Daodejing. The philosophy is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of classical chinese most of the concepts will go over a typical reader’s head. There’s also Laozi's esoteric outlook, which is deftly woven into his maxims- his personal philosophy draws heavily from obscure Spring and Autumn texts, for instance. The readers understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these adages, to realise that they’re not just nonsense- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike the Daodejing truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in Laozi's existential catchphrase “Tianxia dou zhi mei zhi wei mei” which itself is a cryptic reference to the Zhougong's Zhouyi. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Laozi's genius wit unfolds itself on their Kindle screens. What fools.. how I pity them.
  40. And yes, by the way, i DO have a Yinyang tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It’s for the ladies’ eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they’re within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid.
  41.  
  42.  
  43. To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Thomas Aquinas. The metaphysics is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of aristotelian language most of the proofs will go over a typical reader's head. There's also Thomas's teleological outlook, which is deftly woven into his ethics - his personal philosophy draws heavily from the natural law theory, for instance. Thomists understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these proofs, to realize that they're not just correct- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Thomas Aquinas truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existential catchphrase "Truth is equal to Being" which itself is a cryptic reference to Augustine's theological masterpiece The CIty of God. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Thomas Aquinas's genius unfolds itself in front of their eyes in the Summa Contra Gentiles. What fools... how I pity them. :joy: And yes by the way, I DO have the bi-lingual complete edition of Summa Theologica. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the thomistic babe' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement