Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Feb 18th, 2018
72
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.18 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 14:54:55 +LogBen | If I can just keep you here for a couple of minutes:
  2. 14:55:09 +narwhalz0111 | RE: updating in background: skip out of the logic if the vessel's not active
  3. 14:55:11 +LogBen | Vessel.vesselModules returns a List<VesselModule>
  4. 14:55:25 +narwhalz0111 | RE: added to every vessel: that's a feature not a bug :V
  5. 14:55:57 +LogBen | maybe if the List<sfengine> is null we return
  6. 14:56:07 +narwhalz0111 | That too.
  7. 14:56:28 +narwhalz0111 | But return if it's not active first.
  8. 14:56:34 +LogBen | Re: vesselModule list
  9. 14:56:57 +LogBen | if I do typeof(vesselModuleList[i]), would that return the vesselmodule class name?
  10. 14:57:29 +narwhalz0111 | No, it's a special Type object IIRC.
  11. 14:57:53 +LogBen | Okay, so i can get the type of the class probably through a static method
  12. 14:57:56 +narwhalz0111 | But you can compare it to typeof(Controller) or whatever.
  13. 14:58:08 +narwhalz0111 | (what are we using this for again? :V)
  14. 14:58:51 +LogBen | uhh
  15. 14:59:01 +LogBen | The warp drive controlling modules
  16. 14:59:11 +LogBen | :V
  17. 14:59:22 +narwhalz0111 | For the frameshift?
  18. 14:59:53 +LogBen | any and all
  19. 15:00:14 +narwhalz0111 | so not just warp drive then :V
  20. 15:00:31 +LogBen | nu
  21. 15:00:39 +LogBen | theres a seperate one for each
  22. 15:00:52 +narwhalz0111 | okay
  23. 15:00:53 +narwhalz0111 | :V
  24. 15:01:03 +LogBen | cause they all have different reqs
  25. 15:01:13 +LogBen | afk for transit
  26. 15:26:39 +LogBen | ping narwhalz0111
  27. 15:26:43 +narwhalz0111 | pong
  28. 15:26:52 +LogBen | where were we?
  29. 15:27:22 +LogBen | Should I combine the flightdrives so we only have one?
  30. 15:27:30 +LogBen | I could probably do that
  31. 15:29:43 +LogBen | right?
  32. 15:33:58 +narwhalz0111 | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  33. 15:34:09 +narwhalz0111 | I think that FSD and SWD should share a common backend.
  34. 15:36:39 +LogBen | all right
  35. 15:36:44 +LogBen | but what about the other two?
  36. 15:37:27 +LogBen | Cause I could write them all to have common backends
  37. 15:37:44 +LogBen | It would probably be easier to have them all have the same flightdrive
  38. 15:37:51 +LogBen | so it's just KFFlightDrive
  39. 15:39:53 +narwhalz0111 | The other two operate in fundamentally different ways.
  40. 15:40:56 +LogBen | so?
  41. 15:41:00 +LogBen | hmm
  42. 15:41:24 +LogBen | see, cause I could just break it up into sets of functions
  43. 16:14:54 +narwhalz0111 | It's inappropriate to use the same stuff to do an instantaneous jump as to do a continuous thing.
  44. 16:15:27 +LogBen | right, right
  45. 16:15:38 +LogBen | which ones are instantanious again?
  46. 16:15:47 +LogBen | !FSD
  47. 16:15:52 +LogBen | !SWD?
  48. 16:16:04 +TotallyNotHuman | SFD is near-instantaneous.
  49. 16:16:07 +narwhalz0111 | The SFD is the instantaneous one.
  50. 16:16:11 +TotallyNotHuman | git ninja'd :V
  51. 16:16:17 +LogBen | and polly?
  52. 16:16:22 +narwhalz0111 | (for KSP's purposes it is actually instantaneous)
  53. 16:16:30 +narwhalz0111 | That one is weird :V
  54. 16:16:34 +TotallyNotHuman | ('tis a technicality! V:)
  55. 16:16:38 +LogBen | >.>
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment