Protected - Last Tuesday at 3:11 PM
After reading 1 and 2, I feel like your argument is bogus because it is postulated that the growth of ISPs is as important as a fair, open market for over a million other companies
You also say things like "those fees could potentially fuel broadband growth". You are contrasting certainties against wishful thinking!
The writing is for you to complain about, rot
I'm not a native english speaker, though :stuck_out_tongue:
You also argue that consumers could benefit from zero-rating, but you should probably examine this argument on a time scale
If zero-rating promotes monopolies in the way I explained here before, then is it truly good for consumers in the long run?
Most people agree monopolies are bad
Regarding 3: There is no unbiased opposition to net neutrality. There are only critics of net neutrality regulation, who are not critics of net neutrality in itself