Here's why Meghan Markle was 'unprotected' from the tabloids

Here's why Meghan Markle was 'unprotected' from the tabloids, unlike Kate Middleton and Prince Andrew

Meghan Markle recently said she was "unprotected" from the British tabloids and that her Kensington Palace press team didn't allow her to respond to articles written about her.
While Kensington Palace declined to comment on the statement, royal expert Richard Fitz williams said the palace's media policy is to reply to only the most "serious" articles.
That could explain why Buckingham Palace was quick to defend Prince Andrew when he was first linked to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scandal.
However, Kensington Palace recently criticized a Tatler  profile of Middleton which claimed she was upset about increased royal duties.
There are a number of factors that could have contributed to the palace's decision to defend Middleton and not Markle, including the Duchess of Sussex's reported strained relationship with her aides.
It has also been suggested that Middleton is treated differently because she is future Queen, and therefore higher in rank than Markle.
Visit Insider's homepage for more stories.
The Duchess of Sussex has said she was "unprotected" and "prohibited from defending herself" from the media scrutiny when she was a royal.
In court documents filed for Meghan Markle's lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday, her lawyers said that Kensington Palace didn't give Markle the option to set the record straight on false stories.
for more:https://ouo.io/ekXimZY