Waterworld Full Movie Hindi Download



********************
Waterworld Full Movie Hindi Download
http://urllio.com/r2pmr
(Copy & Paste link)
********************


In a future where the polar ice-caps have melted and Earth is almost entirely submerged, a mutated mariner fights starvation and outlaw &quot;smokers,&quot; and reluctantly helps a woman and a young girl try to find dry land.
The polar ice caps have melted, and the earth is covered by water. The remaining people travel the seas, in search of survival. Several different societies exist. The Mariner falls from his customary and solitary existence into having to care for a woman and a young girl while being pursued by the evil forces of the Deacon.
First off. I like this movie. It&#39;s an enjoyable enough action-flick, and much underrated. When you go to see a movie like this you shouldn&#39;t expect too much in the way of realism in some aspects (remember Armageddon?) but it was perhaps unfortunate that, at the time this movie came out, I was teaching SCUBA diving.<br/><br/>As an instructor you learn certain basic facts of physics regarding the sea which perhaps took the edge off this film&#39;s impact. For a start, the opening sequence depicts the world completely flooding when the ice-caps melt - I don&#39;t think so. Then we had Kev Costner distilling fresh water out of his own urine? What&#39;s wrong with all that sea water he&#39;s floating on? No ammonia to get rid of there, for a start. A lot easier.<br/><br/>Finally, we had him taking Jean Tripplehorn down into the murky depths to show her a drowned city. Someone obviously never told the writers that air compresses under pressure, so her little diving bell&#39;s supply would have been compressed down to a bubble probably not much bigger than her head. Not to mention that normal air becomes toxic beyond a certain depth. Ah well.<br/><br/>Despite these negative comments, I still like this film and watch it occasionally.
The polar icecaps have melted, all land has been lost below the rising waves and man has had to adapt to a new world where the survivors live wholly on the sea. Mankind now exists within several key groups: slavers, smokers, small communities and lone sailors who trade their way as they go. One such trader is the Mariner, a tough, lone man who mistrusts everyone  a mistrust that is proved correct when a community spots he is also a mutant and sentences him to death. Before it can be carried out though, the Smokers attack and the Mariner is able to escape thanks to a woman and a little girl. However the little girl also happens to &quot;be&quot; the only existing map to dry land and the Mariner finds himself pursued by the Smokers.<br/><br/>Everyone knows that the critics had buried this one before it even reached a single screen. It is rare for critics to see horrible movies  few of these make it to the cinema  so whenever they get the chance to write a scathing review, they tend to take it and run with it. However as the critics moved onto the bandwagons of other years, Waterworld has been left to stand for itself and be judged on its own merits. When you look at it as it actually is, the film just sits as an OK blockbuster, nothing more but certainly nothing less either. The plot is a cross between Mad Max on water and the standard &quot;tough guy coming to love little kid&quot; things that provides a plot driver and supposedly an emotional way in. In creating a good story, it doesn&#39;t really manage it because it is too full of holes and lacks a real sense of engaging motion and characters but then, isn&#39;t that something you could say of many blockbusters.<br/><br/>The creation of its own future is pretty well done and it all looks good even if it does lack any sense of logic. Again, I don&#39;t understand why it got such a kicking because to my eye it looked pretty good considering the challenges of shooting on water. Too many lazy reviewers (professional and amateur alike) have jumped on the &quot;all at sea&quot; line when talking about the performances and, although few are that great, lazy joking is rather a critique. Costner goes for a dark hero but misses a bit and ends up just being a bit unrelatable until his predictable sea change (sorry) at the end. He is still OK but didn&#39;t help me get into the characters. Tripplehorn is basic and her character could have easily been played by anyone. Majorino is annoying of course but then she is a typical cute kid role and nothing more. Hopper at least has fun and he does add a bit of enjoyment to the film where the others are forced to treat the material a bit more seriously; the film&#39;s high points generally come when he is on screen. The rest of the cast fill the space but don&#39;t do a great deal else but then, like many blockbusters, this is not an actor&#39;s film.<br/><br/>Overall then, critically mauled and great fun for critics of the time but in essence it is just another in a long line of average blockbuster movies. The cast aren&#39;t great, the story is so-so, the action is enjoyable and the design of it looks good (albeit a bit too much indebted to Mad Max). Nothing special about it and mostly memorable for the kicking it unjustly received but if you are looking for an apocalyptic summer blockbuster then there is no reason why this shouldn&#39;t do the job.
A decent futuristic action picture with some great sets, some intriguing ideas, and a few images that will stay with me.
The movie was heavily cut for the Theatrical Version. Several years later, the American network ABC aired a reconstructed Extended Version that ran more than 43 minutes longer than the original theatrical version, featuring scenes that were cut prior to the movie&#39;s theatrical release. Later on this version was released on DVD as well. In short... no.<br/><br/>Much of the melting would make no difference at all to sea levels. This is because a lot of the ice in the arctic and antarctic is sea ice (ice floats and the icebergs are floating on water). Most of this is already below the waterline - and the only reason a small percentage of an iceberg sticks out of the water is that ice is a bit less dense than water. As it melted the berg would submerge completely, but the ice would also shrink by the same amount as it turned back into water. So the overall effect on the oceans would be zero, or at least very close to it.<br/><br/>What would matter is the ice that is on land melting and that extra water running into the oceans. We don&#39;t have a perfect number for how much of this ice there is, but we do know it is reasonably close, and if all the ice on land melted it would raise sea levels by around 400 feet.<br/><br/>Given that most of the world&#39;s population lives within 400 feet of sea level this would certainly be a global catastrophe of unprecedented scale. But it would cover only a small fraction of the total surface. It is shown in a deleted scene that the Dry land they find at the end of the film is the top thousand feet or so of Mount Everest, which would indeed be the last place to flood if the ocean could rise that far. But in reality, a 400 foot sea level rise would leave the world with almost as much dry land as it has today, in percentage terms.<br/><br/>To give an example of how far the movie is from reality, consider that it shows the Mariner diving thousands of feet down to explore the sunken city of Denver. In reality a 400 foot sea level rise would leave Denver still almost a mile above sea level, and more than 1,000 miles inland from the coast.  a5c7b9f00b