Women were given the right to vote -- the right to help direct society through its chosen politicians -- without being required to defend that society with their lives (conscription) as are men. This principle of "rights without responsibility" is the basis of all feminism. Feminism is based on society's indulgence of women, help them up because they're women and deserve that privilege. Equality of achievement, irrespective of ability. This is the way a society based on respect for excellence is destroyed.

It was remarked during WWI that the old men at home in London prosecuting the war in France were not facing being blown up in muddy trenches and so were all for the war. The right to choose a war policy without the responsibility of personal sacrifice, thus led to the greatest bloodletting in history, something that, it is argued, Europe never recovered from. What females did during this war was give white feathers to men not in uniform, to shame them into joining up, to be blown to bits. It's what women do.

That all of society, all of the niceties, are for women as well as men -- in other words, women benefit from everything the genius and hard-work of their menfolk do. This was the offering of men to women because men like pampering women, and to thank women for the single most important thing in society: bearing and raising and teaching the next generation to behave like civilized human beings. The feminists who offer none of these things, still demand the benefits provided by men though.

Since the 1960's, women have been given more and more privileges -- they had equal rights in all areas at that point -- in response to increasingly shrill demands. The result: privileged, precious women females who are essentially elderly brats -- they feel they are owed whatever they demand, even though they offer nothing back to society. And yet study after study shows that women generally have been getting more and more unhappy. This is because women don't know what will make them happy.

The West, its men having settled the principal hateful ideologies of left and right totalitarianism in the 20th century in its conflicts, settled into a period of peace and complacency. This is not good for human beings, however. People need things to strive for, and women in particular, need men they can respect. With the increasing demands of feminism, the capitulation to every whining feminist bully by men resulted in Western women not respecting their menfolk anymore.

In the West, only the non-European immigrants still have a goal: to wrest from the Europeans the infrastructure and conveniences  developed, built and maintained by Europeans, things that non-Europeans have largely failed to build for themselves in their own countries (with the exception of China and Japan, whose modern societies are virtual carbon copies of what was developed in the West). It is the genius of Western men to create and develop, invent and build. Their women are destroying all of this.

Why are Western women doing this? Because they are unhappy. Psychology has shown that women are driven by emotional thinking, and emotions arise from instincts -- but they don't tell you why, or even how. They only tell you that you want something. Women want to be important, to be cherished and valued, and seek this in the work place. That is not what the workplace is, and the incursion of women into the workplace is destroying the ethic of simple efficiency for emotional demands.

The only place that women can be truly valued and cherished is in an environment where people actually care about them -- which is not the workplace. Only one's family (and to some degree friends) truly values and cherishes a person. And, since women are oriented toward people rather than things, because they care about things being nice and about feelings, it is strange that they view the family as being anything but the perfect venue for their needs both to give and to receive -- feminism does.

The motivation of helping to achieve equality of outcome to all peoples in the West is the feminists' way of feeling they are doing something, without the burden of having families or bearing children. And it goes to the feminist ideal, begun with the right to vote without the requirement of conscription, of being able to direct society as they see fit. But women did not build our society, and are not fit to direct it. The undermining of appreciation of excellence, from which everyone benefits, is part of that truth.

The naive view that a multicultural society is desirable is something only feminists believe, for they don't include rationality, practicality, or truth in their directing -- the rely only on emotional "thinking," which isn't thinking at all. If there is a "population replacement" in the West, then our society will devolved into the kind of societies from which the non-Europeans originate. That is self-evident. They might steal what we built, but because they couldn't build it themselves, they won't be able to maintain it.

The current society, of peace and prosperity for people who follow the requirement of the West: work, get educated, and don't have kids outside of wedlock -- is built on many, many elements. The destruction of any, by the devaluing of the men who keep these things going -- in the sewers, in the power plants, and so on -- will result in these things become relics, while the new savages of the uncivilized West will crap in the gutters and hunt in gangs in primitive fashion. Feminism is pushing for this.

It is important to remember that feminists, however filled with hate they are, do not see this. Women do not see widely, but principally in their immediate realm of self-interest -- which was useful for women governing families and teaching kids to behave. It is men who perceive and can deal with threats from outside a village -- and it is men only who are seeing the immanent destruction of the society they built. Women, having screwed things up, will then deny responsibility, and blame it on men.

This is happening already in Europe. Merkel, the female head of Germany, invited millions of Muslim youth into her country on emotional grounds. German women have welcomed these "refugees," who are now fed and housed at public expense. One story tells of a young, idealistic German woman who worked at shelters for these men, and found that despite her best efforts, they still regarded her as a "slut." She said, disillusioned, she would move to Poland when she retires. This is what women do.

Women follow the mores of their emotions, and when they screw things up -- they run away. Such people cannot run a society; it is not in their natures. But the European ideal of deference to feminism, has produced a curious helplessness in the face of societal invasion. Even the men are subjects of feminism. This is what women. This is simply factual truth. No women ever built any society. They benefit from it, and contribute to it in their realms of excellence. But women governing, only destroy things.