IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SUPREME COURTS OF PENNSYLVANIA
Robert Blair, Jeremy Lowe, Don Bailey, Stephen Duane Curry
(in private capacity by special appearance only)
 : CRIMINAL ACTION FOR FULL
 PUNITIVE DAMAGES:
 v. COMMON GRAND JURY DEMANDED:
 CONCERNING UNAUTHORIZED SALE OF
 ENRICHED URANIUM FOR EMBEZZLEMENT
 : 99-9421
HUMA ABEDIN of CLINTON FOUNDATION,
FRANK GIUSTRA OF CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP,
JOHN PODESTA of Podesta Group, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON of CLINTON FOUNDATION
(Abedin et. all)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR FORMAL PROSECUTION OF SALE OF URANIUM TO UNAUTHORIZED PARTIES
Hon. Christine Donahue,
December 2, 2017
The allegations in relation to accused party HUMA ABEDIN, as it
relates to just one minor aspect of the URANIUM ONE filings are
serious enough to warrant a separate superseding indictment. HUMA
ABEDIN in full capacity as Huma Abedin; was officially present at
several meetings in Kazahkstan alongside FRANK GIUSTRA and the
CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP to take official receipt of an
undisclosed backroom deal, involving the mines in the region. As such,
this is deemed an official quid-quo pro with grave national security
implications which directly affect the interests of the united states.
 In passing, it offers us a glimpse into a criminal transaction that
took place prior to the largest package deals being cut for URANIUM
ONE and their private access stage pass into America’s actual national
interests. Also present for the initial phase of this deal was none
other than BILL CLINTON. On a wide scale, this illicit deal had a
negative affect on the entire nation’s uniform security protocols
and receives explicit special ‘focus’ mention for this reason.
 -1-
While it may come as little surprise, there is also new evidence
that will warrant an immediate in-depth review by state national jurors.
This indictment is directly against HUMA ABEDIN in official capacity;
as well as private for arranging a quid-quo pro. By the same token we
also charge JOHN PODESTA as well as Podesta Group for taking direct
part in an illicit and illegal transaction which greatly affected
the national interest in severe ways. In addition, we place specific
charges of conspiracy against FRANK GIUSTRA and CLINTON-GIUSTRA
ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP for directing official sale without permission.
Due to various damages that were inflicted, we also charge principal
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON; in both public and private: for commissioning
this probationary sale and getting involved in mining affairs of a
foreign nation which is in violation of both 18 U.S.C Code 96 and §2381.
In respect to this, we have no choice except to note FRANK GIUSTRA
and JOHN PODESTA are not registered under the required FARA Act.
Thereby we have little issue with charging both JOHN PODESTA and
FRANK GIUSTRA with 18 U.S.C §2381, which is the applied standard
RICO racketeering act of 1961.[see Roviaro v. United States, p. 353 U.S. 53 (1957).] The
deal in question is clearly done on behalf of a Foreign Interest,
and neither party in particular the Podesta Group opted
to register as a Foreign Agent under FARA as required.
[https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/353/53/case.html]
We assert that although the meeting did not involve URANIUM ONE
directly, it is well conceived that the sale did launch this crisis
and illicit backroom deals lying at the heart of the crime. The
entire URANIUM ONE fiasco has likewise, set back the nation’s
interests for several decades to come.
 -2-
Your honors, we will note that the Supreme Court has ruled that
a more stringent standard is always applied in cases affecting
the ‘national interest.’ Under 18 U.S.C or 15 U.S.C, similar
principles are always applied. In particular, Foreign Interest
peddling is noted as a serious criminal offense:
"The government, however, altered the charging language in a superseding indictment to allege that Mr. Hoskins conspired
to act “together with” Alstom Power US to violate 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2 (prohibiting domestic concerns from using interstate
commerce corruptly to promise, authorize, or give anything of value to a foreign official) and 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-3”
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a97204a6-1d71-47f6-ac46-917612e3745a
https://www.scribd.com/document/354809991/U-S-v-Dmitro-Firtash-and-Andras-Knopp
As found in, United States v. HOSKINS, No. 12-238, 2015, WL 4774918.
As it pertains to breaking the Corrupt Influence Practices Act;
we assert that PODESTA violated U.S.C. 15 §78dd-2, by actively peddling
for foreign interests. Specifically, it is obvious he did consulting
work for Russian firms including Rosatom and Sberbank – the exact
same Rosatom who bought URANIUM ONE. Yet, unlike his acts in SAUDI
ARABIA- PODESTA did not actively register under the Foreign Agent
Registration Act. He likewise failed to disclose the large sums
sent his way, on behalf of private consulting work done for the
Russian entity SBERBANK and FRANK GIUSTRA.
https://downtrend.com/robertgehl/russian-connection-podesta-failed-to-register-as-foreign-agent
(with assistance of TENEO Group who we will publicly expose next.)
To start off, we charge HUMA ABEDIN with violating U.S.C. 15 §78dd-2
Count 1) We charge defendant HUMA ABEDIN with breaking U.S.C. 15
§78dd-2 and U.S.C. 18; the law which prohibits racketeering in respect to
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We assert she was ostensibly aware
that her activities at the time with regards to Uranium One as well
as BAHRAIN; were in direct violation of the law. Further by not opting
to register under the required FARA act of each activity, we assert
that the consequences were fully understood in advance. HUMA ABEDIN
 -3-
is registered with Saudi Arabia’s consulate, yet on the whole she
is once again not registered under FARA as required. This will
prove true for her actions at TENEO in regards to RUSSIA, as well
as the unsolicited favors taken for foreign interests such as GIUSTRA
and the BAHRAIN Crisis Group. In addition we point out possible quidquo-pro
motives with Rosatom. Moreover, we cite this again in detail.
 Your honors, to truly grasp HUMA ABEDIN's role in facilitating the Nuclear
 Commission to look the other way on the entire Rosatom deal, one need only
 examine Rajiv Fernando, a member of the ISAB who was just "suddenly"
 appointed to the oversight board on nuclear weapons and security issues at
 none other than the CLINTON FOUNDATION during CLINTON's active role as
 SECRETARY OF STATE. Of course, HUMA ABEDIN didn't disclose those facts to
 the public. These are facts that the many assembled jurors will be highly
 interested in most of all. How does HUMA ABEDIN out of nowhere have the
 clout; to single handedly have a columbian named Rajiv Fernando become
 the new expert on Nuclear Regulatory Affairs at the CLINTON FOUNDATION.
 During the exact time that the Rosatom deal is publicly being approved at
 the DEPARTMENT OF STATE which opens the door for public sale of the
 mines.(and a increase in salary for ABEDIN while at Teneo. Fernando
 is also a third-hand cousin of Fernandez who used to run MGM Hotels,
 which is a nice tale for another day.) We are certain that MS. ABEDIN
 extra enjoyed the gifts from GIUSTRA. The penalty carries a sentence of

 15 years in prison and she is ordered to surrender her passport.
"According to the website, ISAB offers the State Department “independent insight and advice on all aspects of arms control, disarmament,
nonproliferation, international security, and related aspects of public diplomacy.” This is the board Clinton seems to have thought was okay to offer
some sort of payback to a top donor.
Rajiv Fernando acknowledged that he may not have the experience to sit on a board that would allow him the highest levels of top-secret access,
but he assured deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin in newly released 2009 emails that he was talking to two professors who were “getting me up
to speed on the academics behind the field.
Fernando, who contributed to Clinton, her family’s foundation and Barack Obama, described himself as one of “Hillary’s people” and mentioned that
he recently had sent an ailing Clinton flowers to wish her a speedy recovery.”
-4-
''As a member of the board, Fernando was to advise Clinton on nuclear weapons and other security issues alongside nuclear scientists, former
Cabinet secretaries and former lawmakers, including former Defense Secretary William Perry; Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, a former national security
adviser to two presidents; and former Sen. Chuck Robb of Virginia.
He [Fernando] contributed between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to records released by the foundation. Between
$100,000 and $250,000 was donated before his board appointment. He once traveled with former President Bill Clinton to Africa.
Add the Fernando foul-up, with the fact that Clinton did a 180-degree turn on the Colombia Free Trade Agreement, which helped donor Frank
Giustra, and the billions in arms sales she gave to foreign nations who poured million into her non-profit—all point to a serial history of half-truths
and distortions. Then again, this is politics and the Clintons—don’t expect a straight answer on anything."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/06/30/clinton-donor-promised-to-make-clinton-look-good-if-appointed-to-national-security-board-n2184031
That's a great question in of itself; which the jury must ask on the record.
We assert that top aide HUMA ABEDIN was fully aware of the pitfalls relating
to the GIUSTRA debacle, even more-so than CLINTON; yet proceeded on a flawed
basis of finishing the sale regardless knowing the cut they get. The facts
agree that ABEDIN openly bragged about these issues, in public e-mails to
their cohorts on ample occasions.
"Russia and Rosatom have a record of supporting nuclear programs in countries that are openly hostile to the United States, such as Iran, North
Korea and Venezuela. And now, America’s uranium could find its way to an Iranian or North Korean nuclear reactor and their weapons programs,
thanks to Hillary and her brazen contempt for our nation’s interests and security."
"Just as troubling, Hillary has had Huma Abedin as her top aide for years, even though Abedin was also working for the Muslim World League at
the time, whose explicit goal is to conquer the West in the name of Islam, sympathizing with Al Qaeda and the Islamic State. A Muslim
Brotherhood agent from an illustrious Muslim Brotherhood family, Abedin has been privy to an enormous wealth of information concerning strategy
plans and operation details in the war on terror, which might explain how Ambassador Stevens’ secret trip to Benghazi was exposed to the
terrorists." http://www.federalobserver.com/2016/10/19/smith-traitor-is-her-name/
Of course your honor, we will need to subpoena all of the records.
A cited court case brings up the fact that the CITIZENS UNITED
GROUP has brought several class-action criminal cases against
the CLINTON FOUNDATION; to seize and observe all e-mail records
pertaining to TENEO and the CLINTON GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP,
which it now seems isn't too difficult to see why.
https://www.unitedstatescourts.org/federal/dcd/176278/1-0.html
Maybe every member of the jury's panel must ask JOHN PODESTA,
who has for years denied the "preferential" relationship he
held with TENEO consulting to collect for his firm PODESTA GROUP.
"This email forwards an email Doug Band, head of Teneo, had addressed to Abedin as well as to the following recipients:
 John Podesta, former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and the current chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign;
 Cheryl Mills, then chief of staff to Secretary Clinton;"http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/emails-abedin-was-hillarys-nexus-to-scandalous-foundation/
 https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-048f-da25-a55e-efaf30b60000
-5-
"In some cases, Teneo's business relationship with foundation donors moved in the other direction: Band's closeness with the Clintons gave him access to
donors that he then leveraged into contracts for his firm.Teneo has been at the center of the controversy, and Band's dual roles at the foundation and the
consulting firm have drawn allegations that he built a business off of political connections gleaned throughout decades in the Clintons' orbit."
http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-aides-memo-details-ties-consulting-firm-clinton-foundation/
In addition your honors, HUMA ABEDIN also worked for TENEO
holdings while conducting favors for PRINCE SALMAN of Bahrain,
where FRANK GIUSTRA sits on the international advisory board.
Specifically for the Bahrain revolt relating to Bahrain's Islam
in Crisis Group, during the same years the deal took place.
https://www.scribd.com/document/53112659/The-Bahrain-Revolt-via-Int-l-Crisis-Group
 On top of this, HUMA ABEDIN's brother is also the official
 chair person for IMMA: the group in charge of spreading Islam
 at the tip of a spear through-out the East Asian continent.
https://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/tag/huma-abedin-family-saudi-al-saud/
 The various favors HUMA ABEDIN has done for these officials
 are astonishing your honor, as though she held no allusions
 that she would ever be found out. They took place at TENEO
 and elsewhere over a period of several years.
 "On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Huma Abedin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Rina – wanted to connect on meeting at state department. Eddie trump passed on your email. Will be in touch soon
From: Rina Kirshner
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:29 AM
To: Huma Abedin
Subject: Re: Eddie Trump/Doug Band
Ms. Abedin,
Just wanted to follow up and express our gratitude. I was contacted today by Ms. Christina Miner who invited us to be part of the US-Russia Cultural SubWorking
Group meeting next week. Thank you very much for all your assistance – if there is any way we can be of assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
 Rina Kirshner
From: Huma Abedin [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 12:19:12
To: Doug Band
Subject: FW: Eddie Trump/Doug Band
fyi – we hooked her up with the right people here
The Russia-American Foundation was staffed by Clinton political supporters and operatives, received over $260,000 in grants for “public diplomacy” from the
Clinton State Department, and its leadership was supportive of Obama’s Russia policies." https://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/judicial-watch-new-clinton-email-release-russianamerican-foundation-hook-up/
 -6-
Each one in another instance is directly tied to the
Russian transactions. Thereby, we see little choice except
to charge HUMA ABEDIN with breaking 18 U.S.C. Code 96, for
corrupt influence peddling in a manner that proves highly
deceitful. This was all done of course, to secure lucrative
deals: with the biggest deal being the CLINTON FOUNDATION's
pay-to-play scheme with CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP;
which would result in a disturbing amount of harm to national
 public interests. [http://thefederalist.com/2016/08/22/new-emails-hillarys-right-hand-woman-did-favors-for-clinton-foundation-donors/]
"The Podesta Group managed a second Russian account, i.e. Uranium One, a Russian atomic energy company that secured oil
rights in Kazakhstan and the United States through direct collaboration with the Clintons (Related: These Are The Two
Companies That Could Land Hillary Clinton In Hot Water). The Russian company funneled tens of millions to the Clinton
Foundation and in return received legitimate government benefits."
Uranium One paid the Podesta Group some “$40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service,
and the National Security Council,” for mining rights, the Daily Caller reports." http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/01/john-podestas-ties-to-russianand-saudi-money/
"It looks like the money bought meetings with State Department officials. Additionally, Podesta’s lobbying aimed at both Congress
and the Executive branch. More so, Podesta was key in removing sanctions against Sberbank and VTB Capital, Russia’s second
largest bank." https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/firmsum.php?id=D000022193&year=2016
Count 2) HUMA ABEDIN is charged with covering up two illegal
 quid-quo pro deals, concerning FRANK GIUSTRA and the eventual
 uranium mining in East Asia linked to Rosatom. In this, we
 find her guilty of the conspiracy charge in §78dd-3. On the
 whole, we also see substantial circumstantial evidence to
 charge ABEDIN with the offense of child-trafficking of minors;
 and on account of her being a lobbyist for SAUDI ARABIA we
 enforce the edict with extra emphasis. As ARABIA is a large
 global human trafficking center, it stands to reason that
 the crime must match the weight of the offense. SAUDI
 ARABIA in recent times is no different than BAHRAIN, ISRAEL
 -7-
 or KUWAIT when it comes to the crime of trafficking. And in
 this respect, all parties who facilitate it are just as guilty. The
 penalty for such offenses is an additional ten years in prison.[probation.]

 In addition to the offense, ABEDIN is guilty of assisting FRANK
 GIUSTRA of probable human trafficking done through the RADCLIFFE
 FOUNDATION. She is named as an accessory on that separate offense.
 Her close association with MARINA ABRAMOVIC raises troubling new
 questions, in respect to her ties to SAUDI trafficking of minors.

Count 3)ABEDIN is charged with concealment of the murder of several
 victims in the course of child trafficking. MARINA ABRAMOVIC was
 a highly renowned child trafficker engaged in satanic ritual abuse re-
 enactments, through use of children’s organs and display of semen or
 human/animal blood. This ‘rehearsal’ was chiefly observed by ABEDIN and
 PODESTA, yet CLINTON herself also became embroiled with this unabashed
 sorceress which impairs judgment. ABRAMOVIC is listed in a separate
 indictment, which stands apart from the URANIUM ONE incident where
 she stands charged of lurid offenses. It is clear from the evidence
 laid out that ABEDIN knew children were trafficked and murdered, yet
 did not intervene. It was also carried out despite warnings about
 cannibalism traditions with the ABRAMOVIC clan, something which did
 not phase nor bother FRANK GIUSTRA. It adds an additional 5 year sentence.
 Huma Abedin repeatedly promotes ABRAMOVIC to the whole group:


 -8-
 “From: Huma Abedin
 Sent: 8/20/2010 11:54:06 AM +00:00
Subject: Re: I apologize....
Yes she is. We just wanted to make sure you were set this morning. She's jumping on shuttle as soon as you
leave. I’m leaving for now.
Original Message
From: H
To: Huma Abedin
Sent: Fri Aug 20 07:49:25 2010
Subject: Re: I apologize....
Also, I was not expecting Marina to be here. Is she still going w you? “
https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/Nov04_2016/F-2016-07895_1-6/DOC_0C06133863/C06133863.pdf
 https://ibankcoin.com/flyblog/2016/11/04/new-emails-tie-clinton-foundation-and-hillary-to-spiritcooking-marina-abramovic/
“The pictures ringing Tony’s ninth-floor office at Podesta Mattoon deliver an unusual welcome. A suite of arresting
computer-manipulated photographs by Dutch artist Margi Geerlinks serves as a cautionary tale of genetic engineering.
One shows a boy seemingly born from a sewing machine. Another finds a young girl knitting her own hair. A third
has a naked woman immersed in blood-red liquid.“
“We’re not trying to confront sexism and racism in our art collection,” he insists. “Though occasionally they
intersect. Some people’s politics are other people’s aesthetics.”
https://ibankcoin.com/flyblog/2016/11/04/new-emails-tie-clinton-foundation-and-hillary-to-spiritcooking-marina-abramovic/#sthash.EhMWpSm4.gt53fk3I.dpbs

 The next on deck to commit serious offenses is JOHN PODESTA.
 Count 1) Next for the list, we officially charge JOHN PODESTA with
 breaking 18 U.S.C. §2381 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices act.
 This is in respect to his non-compliance to register either
 PODESTA GROUP or any work done under the FARA Act. It also carries
 a penalty of up to twenty years in prison, given it was done in
 the commission of a conspiracy “to attain articles of value.”
 -9-
 Count 2) Similarly, we charge PODESTA in covering up the underage
 trafficking of minors for likely two decades by breaking
 18 U.S.C. §1591 in concert with TONY PODESTA which is the
 applied national standard used for such cases. In so much
 as little regret has been shown, that is also taken
 into account during these highly charged circumstances.
 The offense carries a penalty of up to twenty years
 in prison; following the national sentencing guidelines.
 Further reductions may be offered according to state’s
 evidence that is turned in against SOROS management.
 (we further order commanders to explore the range of
 penalties offered, up to including life in prison.)
 ]
 The evidence which follows is incredibly damning; and offers
 a rare glimpse into organized crime from the perspective of
 foreign lobbyists and the interests whom they curry favors for.
 Most important of all, it demonstrates to the american people
 that our institutions of governance who permitted these wretched
 activities; no longer stand by nor tolerate the rampant abuses. When
 trust in governance is lost, that is officially when government
 fails. As a general rule this entire sordid affair needed to
 be publicly investigated by state special counsels several
 years ago, bringing criminal offenses against all participants
 involved. This will now be fiercely corrected moving forward as
 government must now work to regain any trust it once held.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/05/ny-post-its-time-to-investigate-john-podestas-russia-ties/

-10-

“According to a Reuters report, Tony Podesta was “among the high-profile lobbyists registered to
represent organizations backing Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich.” Among these was the European
Center, which paid Podesta $900,000 for his lobbying.

That’s not all: The busy Podesta Group also represented Uranium One, a uranium company acquired by
the Russian government which received approval from Hillary Clinton’s State Department to mine for
uranium in the U.S. and gave Russia twenty percent control of US uranium. The New York Times
reported Uranium One’s chairman, Frank Guistra, made significant donations to the Clinton Foundation,
and Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for one speech from a Russian investment bank that has “links to the
Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.” Notably, Frank Giustra, the Clinton Foundation’s largest
and most controversial donor, does not appear anywhere in Clinton’s “non-private” emails. It is possible
that the emails of such key donors were automatically scrubbed to protect the Clinton Foundation.
Let’s not leave out fugitive Ukrainian oligarch, Dymtro Firtash. He is represented by Democratic
heavyweight lawyer, Lanny Davis, who accused Trump of “inviting Putin to commit espionage” (Trump’s
quip: If Putin has Hillary’s emails, release them) but denies all wrongdoing by Hillary.
Ian Telfer, the head of the Russian government’s uranium company, Uranium One, made four foreign
donations totaling $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation, as the New York Times reported.”
"This document traces the ownership of Metcombank, a relatively small Russian-domiciled bank located
in the Russian Ural Mountains, to ownership by Viktor Vekselberg, a Russian billionaire with close ties to
Putin.
As we shall see this document provides evidence of the circuitous path the Russian government has
been using since Hillary Clinton was secretary of state to make large financial payments to John Podesta
and to the Clinton Foundation. " http://www.battleswarmblog.com/?tag=frank-giustra
“"Five Days later, on September 2nd, 2015, the FBI special agent sent another notification for
preservation of records to the same agencies -beginning with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission- and
adding: the National Security Agency (NSA – Admiral Mike Rogers) and the United States Secret Service
(USSS).
If you consider the larger Clinton timeline; along with the FBI special agent requests from identified
participants; and overlay the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as the leading entity surrounding the probe
elements; and the fact that the CFIUS participants were the recipients of the retention requests; well, it’s
just too coincidental to think this is unrelated to the Uranium One deal and the more alarming
implications.
Congress can get, and see, those FBI preservation notification documents without redaction. Congress
could then interview the FBI special agent who was obviously in charge of key elements within the 2015
probe. Put the FBI special agent together with the unnamed FBI informant, question them, and discover
what they know about the entire Uranium One deal – and there’s the road-map to tear this thing wide
open.[who knew]"
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/03/uranium-one-previously-undiscovered-foia-documents-could-be-game-changer-in-investigation/comment-page-4/
 Senior Aides warn JOHN PODESTA of serious problems following the deal’s exposure.
“From: Jennifer Palmieri [email protected]
Mme Secretary: Below is the NYT story on the book. It is very long and convoluted.
The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with
uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest
uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable
endeavors of former President Bill Clinton
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/bill_clinton/index.html?inline=nyt-per> and his family. Members of that
group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
Frank Giustra, left, with former President Bill Clinton at a Clinton Foundation news conference in 2007.
 -11-
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all
uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national
security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government
agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary
Rodham Clinton.
[http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/04/13/us/elections/hillary-clinton.html?inline=nyt-per] . As the Russians gradually
assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its
way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000
for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
If the Kazakh deal was a major victory, UrAsia did not wait long before resuming the hunt. In 2007, it merged with Uranium One, a
South African company with assets in Africa and Australia, in what was described as a $3.5 billion transaction. The new company,
which kept the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors including Ian Telfer, a Canadian who became chairman.
Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Giustra, whose personal stake in the deal was estimated at about $45 million, said he sold his stake
in 2007." https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/370
 The deal continues to gain volume as though PODESTA and ABEDIN had

 no care in the world about the consequences, given the extensive
 pay out they will be receiving on behalf of these oligarchs who
 met in secret about illegal mine sales in KAZAHKSTAN plus MOROCCO.
 CLINTON likewise, against her own better judgment enabled GIUSTRA’s
 closing of this deal expecting it would not be traced. Of course,
 as a general rule your honors we assert this is no longer the case.
 As the old London mafia’s slogan went, often the “cover-up” is
 worse than the original crime..which is where you get caught.

 KEVIN SPACEY also named in our filing, benefit from the sales.
“The Kazakhstan deal was finalized in 2005 and Giustra donated $31.1million to the Clinton Foundation
along with an additional $100 million. That big payout earned Giustra a place in Clinton's inner circle.
The Canadian financier threw a 60th birthday party for Bill in Toronto in 2006 emceed by Kevin Spacey
with other starts in attendance. The Clintons' take was a cool $21million 'donation' for their Foundation."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3659123/Slush-funds-pay-personal-consultant-Huma-Abedin-luxe-Caribbean-holiday-daughter-Chelsea-payoffs-silence-Bill-s-sex-accusers-Hillary-used-donations-Clinton-Foundation-personal-piggy-bank.html
“Podesta, it turns out, has been paid an undisclosed amount, starting in 2011, for serving on the executive board of Joule Unlimited
that he neglected to report to regulatory authorities in the U.S., as well consulting fees from the Wyss Foundation, a group
controlled by Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss, an investor in Joule Energy.
In an Aug. 2016 report entitled “From Russia with Money,” the Government Accountability Institute noted that Podesta consulted for
a foundation run by one of the investors in Joule Energy, Hansjörg Wyss, who in turn was a major Clinton Foundation donor.
According to a Reuters report, Tony Podesta was “among the high-profile lobbyists registered to represent organizations backing
Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich.” Among these was the European Center, which paid Podesta $900,000 for his lobbying.”
 http://www.battleswarmblog.com/?tag=frank-giustra

 -12-
"Thank you for sharing. Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her
participation. If hrc was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI also wasn't pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it
wasn't their first choice. This was HRC's idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing
this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting. It will
break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months. She created this mess and
she knows it.
From: Robby Mook <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 10:38:52 AM
To: Huma Abedin; John Podesta
Subject: FYI CGI Africa
Came up on our call with HRC. John flagged the same issues we discussed, Huma."
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22030
PODESTA had suggested that HUMA ABEDIN take a position at Teneo
consulting, a controversial DOUG BAND led firm that was tied to
illegal mine sales in various foreign regions. Also we note again;
Teneo's close internal relations with BARRICK GOLD NORTH AMERICA.
"The messages illustrate the relationship between Clinton’s most trusted confidante and the
private consulting company that asked for the favor, Teneo — a global firm that later hired Abedin.
Abedin signed on with the company while she still held a State Department position, a dual
employment that is now being examined by congressional investigators.
Abedin’s status as a “special government employee” has been questioned by Senate Judiciary
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who has raised concerns about any overlapping
duties and whether they posed potential conflicts of interest. Abedin also worked as an adviser to
the Clinton Foundation, the nonprofit founded by former President Bill Clinton.
Abedin’s legal team maintains that the part-time jobs were appropriate and approved by Abedin’s
supervisors at State and that she did nothing wrong. Indeed, in the email request obtained by
POLITICO, there is no evidence that Abedin interceded on behalf of Teneo as it sought a new
appointment for Judith Rodin, a Teneo client and the president of The Rockefeller
Foundation.The Rockefeller Foundation paid Teneo $5.7 million in 2012 to do public relations
work but no longer works with the firm.
“This is a troubling example of Teneo and the Clinton Foundation seeking State Department help
for a Teneo client and Clinton Foundation supporter,” Grassley said in a statement. “It raises
serious questions. … Was anyone vetting the potential conflicts of interest? Were there other
requests like this, and if so, how were they handled? The State Department ought to release the
rest of any such emails in the interest of good government and transparency."
https:/www.politico.com/story/2015/09/huma-abedin-teneo-clinton-foundation-email-213965
 Of course, in spite of misgivings the PODESTA GROUP continued
 to do private work related to these UKRAINE-RUSSIA interests.
 Even in the absence of approval from CLINTON FOUNDATION, who
 ironically only knew about “some” of the various SOROS deals.
"The Podesta Group managed a second Russian account, i.e. Uranium One, a Russian atomic energy company that secured
oil rights in Kazakhstan and the United States through direct collaboration with the Clintons (Related: These Are The Two
Companies That Could Land Hillary Clinton In Hot Water).
 -13-

The Russian company funneled tens of millions to the Clinton Foundation and in return received legitimate government benefits."
Uranium One paid the Podesta Group some “$40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service, and the
National Security Council,” for mining rights, the Daily Caller reports." http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/01/john-podestas-ties-torussian-and-saudi-money/
"It looks like the money bought meetings with State Department officials. Additionally, Podesta’s lobbying aimed at both Congress
and the Executive branch. More so, Podesta was key in removing sanctions against Sberbank and VTB Capital, Russia’s
second largest bank." https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/firmsum.php?id=D000022193&year=2016
“"Podesta’s job according to the disclosure forms is to assist the bank in clarifying the scope of sanctions from Executive Order
13660, which President Obama signed in March 2014 to block "property of certain persons contributing to the situation in
Ukraine." Podeseta is also tasked with exploring possible avenues for sanctions relief."
https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/03/podesta-bribe-russia/
http://freebeacon.com/politics/top-clinton-lobbyist-bundlers-tied-foreign-banks-governments/
"Since July 2011, the President has served as an advisor to Teneo in support of
its establishment and start-up. Commencing January 1, 2012, the President instead
will become a client of Teneo; Teneo principals will provide consulting services to
the President in his personal capacity.”"
“I’m also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed.”- Doug Band
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2874

http:/www.themaulreport.com/2016/11/05/the-podesta-emails-part-one-uranium-one/
 Of course, today’s offenses are only against the initial

 offering of a backroom deal. That is to say your honors,
 this early indictment only focuses on the scenario leading
 up to transfer of official uranium rights to KAZAHKSTAN. It does
 not cover all the active players, which number more than twenty
 -14-

 whom are charged in the overall URANIUM ONE filings where
 HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and FRANK GIUSTRA are hit with offenses:
 this time for illegal commission of at least 20% enriched uranium
 sent outside the united states; for purpose of re-sale to foreign

 governments and their institutions. [Among them WYOMING, OREGON,
 NEVADA and many various ENERGY LLC mining interests; plus even to
 an extent SOUTH AFRICA.] Inter-alia; evidence is so large for
 those transactions by comparison, it may take a while
 yet to sift through as further transcripts come forward.
 We next bring a charge against FRANK GIUSTRA for enabling a quid-
 quo-pro embezzlement scheme, hatched in the nation of KAZAHKSTAN as
 the offending principal. This was conducted with BILL CLINTON in a
 secret signed accord, after the Lockerbie incident had concluded.
 Count 1) We stand with no options except to charge FRANK GIUSTRA
 with directly breaking 18 U.S.C. §2381, Code 115, and §2384 which each
 carry a penalty of up to twenty years in a maximum-security prison
and also often result in the death penalty being brought.[for seditious
conspiracy against America in the commission of personal enrichment.]
We note that MR GIUSTRA was fully cognizant that his actions were
treason, and failed to alert principal cohort CLINTON of such in
a calculated move to enrich his private mining enterprise and their
board of directors.[who at the time were unaware of Lockerbie.]
 We take note of the severity of each offense, and prescribe proper
 remedy of up to twenty years behind bars in a super-max prison
 with half of it optional in terms of conditional probation.
 [This initial deal is offered instead of three separate ten year sentences,
 which even we agree may be uncalled for. We ask military to explore options.]


 -15-
 GIUSTRA will have to surrender his passport and report to prison

 for nearly eighteen years to clean up each glaring offense. Likewise
 he will be offered probation at the prison’s discretion, depending
 on willingness of GIUSTRA to turn state’s evidence upon SOROS. [As
 such, the Militia will be required to review further for proper penalties.]
 Count 2) Finally we are left with no choice except to charge

 FRANK GIUSTRA in both public and private; with 18 U.S.C. §1591 in
the heinous act of child trafficking of minor victims for later
rape and murder. RADCLIFFE FOUNDATION is a known hot spot for
child rape and trafficking of migrant children. Although GIUSTRA
has been out of the game for a few years, it will be necessary
for him to report to prison for this offense. The penalties vary
in the range of up to ten years for such a serious crime. We will
take note of all current scenarios, and round that to five years
with an added caveat of five years house arrest plus probation.
It occurs to all Americans now that people like MR. GIUSTRA never
should have been allowed such open access to our public officials.
Indeed, this is the real crime at stake in this once acclaimed
nation of laws and justice. It is also up to the people to guard
against such nefarious influences, and not let their guard down
or allow in the GIUSTRA operatives who frequently rub shoulders
with SOROS or ROTHSCHILD. Some of whom have proudly committed
treason, and will implicitly be dealt with as such. For a nation
of laws, does not have a luxury to survive “Treason from within.”
[The militia is tasked to openly explore all available options here, and any deals
with SPACEY or other well-known evils such as PACINO when handing down final charges.]
http:/circa.com/politics/election-2016/clinton-warned-in-2009-memo-that-russian-uranium-moves-were-bad-for-us-europe
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2016/12/01/refugee-charity-uses-pedophile-logo-linked-to-clinton-foundation/
 http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1149762/pg1
-16-

 PEDOPHILE SYMBOLS OPENLY USED IN RADCLIFFE FOUNDATION:
https:/trello.com/c/TBD9LajP/420-the-radcliffe-foundation-was-established-in-1997-by-canadian-businessman-and-philanthropist-frank-giustra-the-radcliffe-foundati
“The Radcliffe Foundation was established in 1997 by Canadian businessman and philanthropist
Frank Giustra. The Radcliffe Foundation supports a wide variety of international and local
causes, focusing on women, children, education and jobs.[brought to you by Rockefeller.]”
 The art on the walls is clearly quite direct in its implicit
 portrayal of many instances of pedophilia. We find the evidence
 impossible to ignore, as according to national trafficking laws
 we need only demonstrate it is “reasonable” to presume the group
 is engaged in child trafficking of minors. Nowhere has this been
 more evident your honor, than on the walls of El Pida home and
 various RADCLIFFE FOUNDATION off-shoots.
“If the elite were to be absolutely secret about what they were doing then their practices, they
believe, would harm themselves and not just the objects of their abuse. It is the belief of the
occult practitioners that they will be spared the karmic blowback of their actions if they let us
know in advance what they are going to do. Our doing nothing in response to defend ourselves, in
their view, is no fault of theirs. The ensuing tragedy and suffering become our responsibility, not
theirs, because they “warned” us. Of course this is another lie. The fact of the matter is that they
do not legitimately warn us, and are in fact preying on our innocence through our lack of
knowledge of the words and symbols they are using.
-17-
RADCLIFFE FOUNDATION OPENLY PROMOTES “TRAFFICKING” SYMBOL

 http://www.theeventchronicle.com/cabal-exposed/deep-states-use-of-pedophilia-to-control-individuals/#
Picture key: 1-2) Frank Giustra with boy lover logo at Elpida front door in Greece. 3) Canadian Boys Club
Network young teen member with founders Frank Giustra and Jim Crescenzo. 4) Elpida factory logo,
founded by Giustra’s Radcliffe Foundation, compared to FBI pedophile symbol. 5-6) Pedophile Elpida logo
found on children’s mural and at center of Elpida basketball court. Is that a slice of pizza on the
backboard? 7) Billionaires Frank Giustra and Carlos Slim with Bill Clinton at ceremony where they pledged
to donate $100 million each to the Clinton Foundation.

http://www.blueberryperspective.com/2016/12/who-is-frank-giustra-investigating.html


 Then if we examine GIUSTRA’s career with a critical eye, we
 see an open cascade of quid-quo pro related crimes as well
 as treason related offenses which can only be gleamed from this
 experience. This is a man who has done this his entire career,
 from as early as their upbringing in CANADA to their final
 downfall at the cross-roads in KAZAHKSTAN. GIUSTRA has in a
 literal sense, been all across the world cutting illegal deals.

"Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a
former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections.
Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the
United States, Bill Clinton.
Upon landing on the first stop of a three-country philanthropic tour, the two men were whisked off to share a
sumptuous midnight banquet with Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev, whose 19-year
stranglehold on the country has all but quashed political dissent. ...
...Within two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company
signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by
Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom.” [everyone wins in Giustra’s circle aside
from America.]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html
-18-
The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest
uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said.
Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3
million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined
with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million,
secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which
friendship with the former president has its privileges.
The publicly stated reason for the visit was to announce a Clinton Foundation agreement that enabled the
government to buy discounted AIDS drugs. But during a news conference, Mr. Clinton wandered into delicate territory
by commending Mr. Nazarbayev for “opening up the social and political life of your country.”
In February 2007, a company called Uranium One agreed to pay $3.1 billion to acquire UrAsia. Mr.
Giustra, a director and major shareholder in UrAsia, would be paid $7.05 per share for a company
that just two years earlier was trading at 10 cents per share.
That same month, Mr. Dzhakishev, the Kazatomprom chief, said he traveled to Chappaqua, N.Y., to meet with Mr.
Clinton at his home. Mr. Dzhakishev said Mr. Giustra arranged the three-hour meeting. Mr. Dzhakishev said he
wanted to discuss Kazakhstan’s intention — not publicly known at the time — to buy a 10 percent stake in
Westinghouse, a United States supplier of nuclear technology. ..."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html
“Huma’s role for the New York event was on behalf of Teneo, while her work for the Ireland event was clearly on behalf of the State
Department. But the firm, the Clintons and Huma were intertwined, and that makes it hard to separate when looking back in
hindsight,” one person directly familiar with the circumstances said.
The list’s disclosure doesn’t necessarily accomplish Obama’s goal, but rather accentuates that there is indeed a rather large conflict.
Of the $500 million the Clinton Foundation has raised over the last decade, big chunks came from the governments of Saudi Arabia,
Norway and Oman as well as a variety of shady individuals with business abroad.
Among them is a Vancouver businessman (Frank Giustra) that donated more than $31 million to Clinton’s foundation after
the former president helped him seal an unheard of uranium deal with the communist dictator of a former Soviet Republic
(Kazakhstan).
A Ukrainian tycoon, Victor Punchuk, who is the son-in-law of that country’s former authoritarian president (Leonid Kuchma) has also
given Clinton several millions dollars as has an Israeli media mogul (Haim Saban) who donates big bucks to pro-Israel politicians.”
https://kingsjester.wordpress.com/tag/clinton-foundation/page/2/
“Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, where Uranium One’s largest American operation was, wrote
to President Obama, saying the deal “would give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America’s
uranium production capacity.”
Uranium One’s shareholders were also alarmed, and were “afraid of Rosatom as a Russian state giant,” Sergei
Novikov, a company spokesman, recalled in an interview. He said Rosatom’s chief, Mr. Kiriyenko, sought to reassure
Uranium One investors, promising that Rosatom would not break up the company and would keep the same
management, including Mr. Telfer, the chairman. Another Rosatom official said publicly that it did not intend to
increase its investment beyond 51 percent, and that it envisioned keeping Uranium One a public company
His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company
appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the
Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his
donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or
Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with
Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.
http://2164th.blogspot.com/2017/07/you-want-russian-scandal-to-investigate.html
“"Take, for example, the case of the company Uranium One. It is one of the world's largest uranium producers – with
a portfolio of assets located in Kazakhstan, the United States, Australia and Tanzania – of which Russia's Rosatom
State Atomic Energy Corporation, owns 100% of outstanding common shares (through its affiliates).

-19-
And according to the New York Times, Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate
transactions from 2009 to 2013, while Canadian records show a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton
Foundation.[subsequently buried and ignored by the mainstream media.]
Moreover, when the deal was being considered Rosatom and the US government had promised to ease concerns
about ceding control of Uranium One's assets to the Russians. But records show that those promises have been
repeatedly broken."
http://qz.com/389829/breaking-down-the-russian-uranium-deal-hanging-over-hillary-clintons-campaign/
“Within days of the visit, Mr. Giustra’s fledgling company, UrAsia Energy Ltd., signed a preliminary deal giving it stakes in three
uranium mines controlled by the state-run uranium agency Kazatomprom.
As if to underscore the point, five months later Mr. Giustra held a fund-raiser for the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, a
project aimed at fostering progressive environmental and labor practices in the natural resources industry, to which he had pledged
$100 million. The star-studded gala, at a conference center in Toronto, featured performances by Elton John and Shakira and
celebrities like Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Robin Williams encouraging contributions from the many so-called F.O.F.s — Friends
of Frank — in attendance, among them Mr. Telfer. In all, the evening generated $16 million in pledges, according to an article in The
Globe and Mail.
By June 2009, a little over a year after the star-studded evening in Toronto, Uranium One’s stock was in free-fall, down 40 percent.
Mr. Dzhakishev, the head of Kazatomprom, had just been arrested on charges that he illegally sold uranium deposits to foreign
companies, including at least some of those won by Mr. Giustra’s UrAsia and now owned by Uranium One.
Publicly, the company tried to reassure shareholders. Its chief executive, Jean Nortier, issued a confident statement calling the
situation a “complete misunderstanding.” He also publicly contradicted Mr. Giustra’s contention that the uranium mining deal
had not required government blessing. “When you do a transaction in Kazakhstan, you need the government’s approval,”
he said, adding that UrAsia had indeed received that approval.
"It was against this backdrop that the Vancouver-based Uranium One pressed the American Embassy in Kazakhstan, as well as
Canadian diplomats, to take up its cause with Kazakh officials, according to the American cables.”
The American Embassy ultimately reported to the secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton. Though the Clarke cable was copied to her, it was
given wide circulation, and it is unclear if she would have read it; the Clinton campaign did not address questions about the cable."
During the trip, Clinton endorsed the spectacularly undemocratic Nazarbayev to head an international body to monitor elections and
support democracy, boosting Nazarbayev's scant democratic credentials, and subsequently Giustra landed a ªmonster dealº
that gives his company exclusive rights to buy into the country's burgeoning uranium mining industry."
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/2014/12/01/billionaire-mining-mogul-frank-giustra-won-t-be-another-rich-dead-dude/
 http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/08/president-clintons-close-colleague-joins-us-oil-sands-board/
"The arrest, which happened a few months after Obama took office, sent Uranium One stock into free fall, as
investors fretted that the Kazakh mining rights would be lost. Uranium One turned to Secretary Clinton’s State
Department for help. As State Department cables disclosed by WikiLeaks show, Uranium One officials wanted
more than a U.S. statement to the media; they pressed for written confirmation that their mining licenses
were valid. Secretary Clinton’s State Department leapt into action: An energy officer from the U.S. embassy
immediately held meetings with the Kazakh regime. A few days later, it was announced that Russia’s Rosatom had
purchased 17 percent of Uranium One. Problem solved."
https://counterjihadreport.com/tag/huma-abedin/page/2/
"[h]ow exactly can you connect the Abedins’ IMMA to the Saudi MMA?
These make an ironclad case. Here is an example; the manifesto states that:
 “It [MMA] will work under the umbrella of the Muslim World League (MWL) and International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO)
and World Association of Muslim Youth (WAMY) and others” (P. 6, also see P. 23)
The Arabic Dictionary on Media Icons by Zarkali confirms the above plan fits IMMA:
" “Sayed Z. Abedin is a specialist on Muslim Minority Affairs issues… In the early 1970′s, Sayed Z. Abedin went to Saudi Arabia for one
year as a visiting professor. He was welcomed by King Abdulaziz University, which provided him the means to create a scholarly program
regarding Muslim Minorities. Dr. Abdullah Omar Naseef, the Dean of King Abdulaziz University then envisioned the creation of an academic
entity called the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), under the management of Ahmad Bahafzallah, who was the General Trustee for
the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY). Professor Sayed Z. Abedin was encouraged to supervise the Muslim Minority Affairs and
served as IMMA’s chief editor.” (Al-I’lam by Zarkali, is an encyclopedia on major figures in the Arabic-Muslim Media, P.p. 218)"
http://www.shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Abedin_Affairs_with_Al_Saud_081312.pdf
The history of the Abedins’ IMMA and of the Saudi manifesto’s hierarchy for MMA perfectly match. As we see, it was the Muslim World
League (MWL) with Abdullah Omar Naseef, a Wahhabist who created IMMA under Ahmad Bahafzallah of (the official) World Assembly of
Muslim Youth (WAMY) to supervise the Abedins."
https://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/tag/huma-abedin-family-saudi-al-saud/
 -20-

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/07/proof_that_huma_abedin_has_muslim_brotherhood_connections.html
"Reportedly, Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra, with Clinton at his side, traveled in 2005 to
Kazakhstan. There, Clinton voiced (critical) support for the country's president, who has a widely
criticized human rights record. Yet within days, Giustra's company reportedly inked a preliminary
deal getting a stake in uranium mines.[right that same day after the Abedin/Clinton visit] "
http://www.wsj.com/articles/gifts-to-hillary-clintons-family-charity-are-scrutinized-in-wake-of-book-1429754883
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/Photos+Vancouver+mogul+Frank+Giustra+creates+liquid+gold/8446570/story.html
http://voiceofagopmoderate.blogspot.com/2016/10/omg-frank-giustra-clinton-uranium.html
“On Sep. 07, 2005, a day later, Kazakhstan agreed to give UrAsia coveted uranium mining rights, even though Giustra
had no uranium mining experience, and UrAsia was only a shell company. The mining industry was stunned.
In the months that followed, the Clinton Foundation received $152 million in donations from Giustra. Both Giustra and
Clinton claim the donations were not pay to play. To paraphrase William Huntgate, a member of the Watergate
Committee: "If an elephant walked into the room, some of you would insist that it was a mouse with a glandular condition."
[Insert suitable snarky comment here.]"
 -21-
“Bill Clinton’s $152 million in Foundation donations from Frank Giustra appear to have been the seed money that Accel
Partners and Goldman Sachs needed to get the Leader Technologies’ social networking invention ready for Barack
Obama’s out-of-the-blue presidential announcement on Feb. 10, 2007, sixteen months later."
The RICO Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) requires proof of a "pattern of
racketeering" activity. A pattern defined as two or more activities where the person directly or indirectly invests in,
maintains an interest in, participates in, conducts the affairs of, or acquires income used to acquire an interest in an
enterprise, among other things.
Table 1—A pattern of corruption involving Bill Clinton, Goldman Sachs, Frank Giustra, James W. Breyer, Mark E.
Zuckerberg and Facebook. See previous post AFI (Aug. 12, 2015). Hillary & Bill shill for a secret intelligence agency
cartel. Americans For Innovation.”
Bill spoke in Kazakhstan, then his friend Frank Giustra (Goldman Sachs) received coveted uranium mining contracts for
which he was not qualified (but Goldman Sachs wanted)
Bill started getting $152 million from Giustra, then Breyer and Zuckerberg induced Stanford students to write apps, after
which Breyer secretly started WIN-IN-CHINA in Hong Kong, outside the knowledge of U.S. regulators (revealed by HSBC
whistleblower Hervé Falciani).
Facebook was established with Bill's and Goldman Sachs' money, then Barack Obama announced his candidacy on the
platform, eventually claiming that his presidency would "fundamentally transform America."
Hillary became Secretary of State intent on making Facebook a cornerstone of her E-diplomacy, irrespective of whether or
not Facebook was violating patent law.
Bill Clinton evidently used his influence as America's former president to cajole President Nazarbayev to give the uranium
mining contracts to UrAsia within a day, even though Frank Giustra had no experience in uranium mining (but Goldman
Sachs had friends who did)." https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2016/01/clinton-2005-uranium-junket-netted-152.html
When ARMZ, an arm of Rosatom, took its first 17 percent stake in Uranium One in 2009, the two parties signed an
agreement, found in securities filings, to seek the foreign investment committee’s review. But it was the 2010 deal, giving
the Russians a controlling 51 percent stake, that set off alarm bells. Four members of the House of Representatives
signed a letter expressing concern. Two more began pushing legislation to kill the deal.”
That renewed adversarial relationship has raised concerns about European dependency on Russian energy resources,
including nuclear fuel. The unease reaches beyond diplomatic circles. In Wyoming, where Uranium One equipment
is scattered across his 35,000-acre ranch, John Christensen is frustrated that repeated changes in corporate ownership
over the years led to French, South African, Canadian and, finally, Russian control over mining rights on his property.”
http://2164th.blogspot.com/2017/07/you-want-russian-scandal-to-investigate.html
Of course we also note to your honors, that HILLARY CLINTON was
retaining direct oversight of board meetings during decisions for
CLINTON-GIUSTRA PARTNERSHIP (rather than GIUSTRA himself) to take
a substantial stake in the aforementioned mining share company.
This same company would go on to be promoted globally; as it
then manifest on the scene as URANIUM ONE. (contained in each
of the URANIUM ONE filings which will go public.) At that exact point,
an official sale is said to have commenced as this is the time
that more than 20% of enriched uranium was sold abroad and
administered to foreign nations including PAKISTAN and KOREA.
Of special note is the fact that ROBERT MUELLER was involved
in the initial demonstration in 2009, that raises more red flags.

-22-
 Finally we reach HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, and charge her with
 breaking §2381 several times. Likewise, she is charged with conspiracy
 to violate the public trust(§ 371 ) given all she knew about GIUSTRA’s
 behavior. CLINTON in this type of situation may not defer to ETHEL
 ROSENBERG; the only public official in years to commit such crimes.
 ETHEL ROSENBERG we note your honors, committed open air treason by
 selling out united states secrets to foreign firms; including even

 the likes of RUSSIA and CHINA. Her many vast crimes were infamous;
 as her web of influence was well known at every stage of the hoax
 played upon the American public. No remorse was ever exhibited.
 She was also not afforded a defense, as there can be no such thing
 when it comes to deliberately harming america’s national interests.
“The 1951 Trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and Martin Sobell is one of the best well-known political
prosecutions in US history. The guilty verdicts resulted in the 1953 execution of the Rosenbergs and the
long term imprisonment of Martin Sobell in penal institutions designed for hardened criminals, despite
international and vigorous clemency and innocence campaigns. The trial has generated a significant
scholarly and popular literature, a partisan and divisive decades-long debate over the guilt of the
defendants, post-Cold War revelations that shook Leftist orthodoxy which assumed the innocence of the
accused, and has resonance in popular culture to this day- in novels, films, plays, art and public
exhibitions.(worldwide)”
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14743892.2013.876710?needAccess=true&
 -23-
Count 1) We of course directly charge HILLARY CLINTON with
violating 18 U.S.C. §2381, on exactly two occasions. In
respect to this serious offense, it is a violation of the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and a racketeering charge.
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON is hereby charged with organized
Racketeering in commission of a national offense; in order
to “attain significant items of value.”
This offense when it comes to the secret setup of GIUSTRA’s
private deal carries a public penalty of up to fifteen years
in a satisfactory prison. [with probationary releases as agreed upon.]
We request the public jury panel to amend the sentence
as is tenable, according to each level of cooperation for
turning state’s evidence.
We cannot assert nor accuse HILLARY CLINTON of openly
committing treason, as her judgment had been impaired
during the weeks spent with MARINA ABRAMOVIC as presumed.
However she is nonetheless guilty of ignoring many
warning signs relating to GIUSTRA’s “special” deal
early on, the signs that no doubt plagues her now.
It truly goes to show you that when it comes to
committing crimes for personal self-enrichment,
it pays to look both ways before crossing the line.
HILLARY CLINTON was certainly not thinking clearly of
the long-term effects against the nation, that is tied
into this entire rotten affair. Likewise, she should not
have been engaged with PODESTA for as long as she was
given the open audacity JOHN PODESTA was evincing.
 -24-
In this respect, we do agree your honors that HILLARY
 CLINTON is far from an innocent bystander. We admonish
 her actions to point out the level of harm done. She was not
 fully prepared for the pitfalls of this illegal mining
 operation; and was not at the time looking at right or
 wrong in this regard. The only thing on CLINTON’s mind
 was possible revenge against those she felt slighted her,
 which is understandable yet no excuse for such conduct.

 The criminal activities of GIUSTRA are legendary in scope,
 as he has openly played favorites with satanic circles.
 So it will be stated here very cleanly, that against her
 better judgment due to group influence by ABRAMOVIC and
 similar charlatans; she made a grave error. Thankfully in
 the long-run, she didn’t have enough awareness to truly be
 culpable for treason. For these are serious offenses, and
 each time they are levied it most assuredly impacts America.
 She is ordered to surrender her passport and admit a few of
 these gross errors in judgment. A sentence of fifteen years
 may be reviewed at will; and adjusted following the federal
 sentencing guidelines and regulations.
 The Militia will recognize how to best handle this, and escort
 her to prison to assure it never repeats.
[squadron leaders are ordered to review probationary guidelines and punishments where
warranted to assure smooth transition.]
Count 2) We have little choice except to charge
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON with two counts of U.S.C 18
§1591, the maximum offense for child trafficking. She
 -25-
is remorseful for ever being involved with ABRAMOVIC,
who is charged separately; therefore the penalty
amounts to up to ten years probation. Likewise, for
the several murders she concealed we order a stiff
penalty of one extra year of mental health review.
She is also ordered to apologize to any victims, who
she purportedly abused, raped as well as traumatized
for over ten years.
Five of those sentencing years is to be spent in
or under house arrest, and confinement as warranted
with no outside contact to corrupting influences.
 The evidence of course is highly damning, as follows:
 http:/www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/oct/24/what-you-need-know-about-hillary-clinton-and-urani/
"It is clear why Mrs. Clinton did not want to release these e-mails: They detail precisely the Clinton Foundation corruption that critics
have long alleged. Specifically, the e-mails detail Huma Abedin’s role – while she was on the State Department’s payroll — acting
as a fixer for the Clinton Foundation, making sure that influential friends overseas, especially donors, had access to the U.S.
secretary of state in order to keep their egos inflated and their wallets deflated.
 http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439258/hillary-clinton-huma-abedin-many-troubling-questions-influence-peddling-corruption
“What happened? Hillary was on the committee that approved the decision to transfer 20% of all U.S. uranium to Putin’s
Russia, as nine investors in the deal gave $145 million in largely undisclosed donations to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium
is considered a strategic resource, and requires U.S. government approval to acquire. Without Bill Clinton’s friendship, and Hillary
Clinton’s sign-off, the deal would not have been made. Giustra and Telfer were two of the key principals at Uranium One,
Inc."https:/hubpages.com/politics/Everything-is-for-Sale-at-the-Clinton-Foundation
 http://canadafreepress.com/article/cnn-the-most-busted-name-in-news
"The Clinton Foundation also has accepted millions from foreign countries — some with deplorable humanrights
records — that needed approval from State for roughly $165 billion worth of weapons deals."
http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2016/08/11/hillarys-pay-play-state-department-doled-huge-number-favors-high-dollar-foundation-donors
http://ijr.com/2015/04/305269-2-hillary-clinton-influence-russian-nuclear-fuel-deal-clinton-foundation-received-millions-dollars/
https://eaglerising.com/38210/wikileaks-more-clues-that-tie-clintonspodesta-to-child-prostitution-ring/
“As if we didn’t know there was some kind of pay-to-play scandal behind the whole Uranium One dealing with Russia
in the first place, right? I mean come on! Let’s face it, Hillary Clinton would sell her soul for money if she could. “

https://joeforamerica.com/2017/11/clinton-nightmare-uranium-one-informant-video-briefcases-full-cash/
 http://canadafreepress.com/article/understanding-the-uranium-one-scandal
 -26-

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SUPREME COURTS OF PENNSYLVANIA
Robert Blair, Jeremy Lowe, Don Bailey, Stephen Duane Curry: : CRIMINAL
 :
 v. : :99-9421
HUMA ABEDIN, JOHN PODESTA, FRANK GIUSTRA,
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON (Abedin et.al)
Concerning a matter of unauthorized quid-quo pro
for private benefit, via off record sale of enriched
uranium assets to restricted foreign parties.[to include: Rosatom and Giustra.]
[in accordance with U.S.C 15 §78dd-2 official code for racketeering when
against the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which results in damage to national interests.]
[In addition are damages 18 U.S.C. §2381 “Racketeering that Violates the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act”
as pertaining to national interests.]
https://www.ndcourts.gov/court/Resource/CriminalCode/FinalReport.pdf https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2009-title18/html/USCODE-2009-title18-partI-chap96.htm
“The current catch all language in 18 U.S.C. 8 2381. i.e.. giving aid and comfort to the enemy, covers both serious and trivial conduct and affords no rational basis for grading.”
AND NOW, on this day of November 18, 2017 during the fall season,
it is hereby ordered that the defendants be charged with cavorting
with minors for their official sale, prostitution and murder.
In addition, it is so ordered that a subpoena be issued upon
HUMA ABEDIN, FRANK GIUSTRA and the PODESTA GROUP to produce any
and all related documents pertaining to official proceeds
to and from the Ukraine including official bills of sale.
This order will also involve the seizure of records pertinent
to URANIUM ONE, including any and all records tied to JOHN PODESTA,
HILLARY CLINTON and the Rosatom company during business hours. An
additional subpoena shall issue upon CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISES.
This will be done to discern all elements of the crime scene. This order stands binding.
It is so ordered that HUMA ABEDIN, JOHN PODESTA, FRANK GIUSTRA as well as HILLARY RODHAM
CLINTON each be found guilty of violating all lines of 15 U.S.C. §78dd-2, plus 18 U.S.C §2381 which
is the maximum penalty for officially breaking the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on more than six
occasions. In addition, they face penalty under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 for trafficking of minors in
underage sex rings. This as your honors will note, is original state law U.S.C code with RICO
charges attached, since we will not support the toothless doctrines that allowed this problem to
fester within the nation. We include of course the added penalty of taking part breaking Code §2381
to attain “items of significant value” in return for the favors carried out. We also boldly assert
penalties for the cover-up of underage child trafficking in public vestibules. As such, those who
conspired to carry out offenses may be eligible for execution. We order they be taken in custody.
For all of these criminal offenses, several Private Attorney Generals will likely have a field day
making each offense stick with penalties. In addition we order there be stiffer penalties attached
to any place where mass murder of minors is proven. We order a formal review by state interim
attorney generals and for locally sanctioned Special Counsels to forcibly subpoena the required
records as your honors will note.
1) It is further ordered that Defendant HUMA ABEDIN’s motion to subpoena records for
discovery, be DENIED;
2) It is further ordered that Defendant JOHN PODESTA’s motion to compel discovery,
and/or protection of records; be DENIED;
3) It is further ordered that Defendant FRANK GIUSTRA’s motion to have subpoenas
quashed, further be DENIED;
4) It is further ordered that Defendant HILLARY R. CLINTON’s motion to subpoena
records or have subpoenas quashed; also be DENIED. Sanctions apply to each request.
5) It is further ordered, that according to Marbury V. Madison: any required subpoenas
on each defendant will be enforced by force of law and arms. All able bodies and
governing council, Private Attorney General’s and militia will enforce the orders.
-27-


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
 This Court’s December, 2017 Amended Scheduling Order is
 amended as follows:
 (a) All discovery shall be completed on or before January 16, 2018 and all
dispositive motions filed not later than two (2) weeks prior to the close of discovery;
and (b) All other deadlines will be deferred by ninety (90) days from the date of
issuance in this Order.
 BY THE COURT:
 SUPREME DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 _____________________________


-28-