Lesta

12 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-23 1020 +THEND

Feb 22nd, 2016
103
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.47 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-23 1020 +THEND
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKWVLf9xPxk&lc=z12mz3jjhvaafvrh204ccpbruxqvylfxxvo0k.1456187035687395
  3. https://pastebin.com/UgB6HARs
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +THEND __ Howdy, please read this message and get back to me. *Everything has to do with the increased view count but "Peekay" has instead sought to make it all about the "scrolling glitch" which has turned out to be nothing.* I want to be sure that you understand everything so please get back to me.
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13. >>> If you don't believe me simply ask "Peekay" himself HOW the view count went from "333" to "351". He will reply "I don't know - I don't understand how YouTube works". <<<
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19. >>> Then ask him: "Did you at any stage refresh the video?" You will probably get "I don't remember" as your reply. <<<
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25. >>> Then ask him: "Did you ever have more than 1 browser tab with your video open?" - again - you won't get a sensible or satisfactory answer. <<<
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. If I were lying or making sh!t up then there is no harm in asking "Peekay" those questions and seeing his response - right? If "Peekay" has done nothing wrong then he would have no problem answering them, right?
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37. But if his reply to you is: "I can't be bothered talking about this any more" then you have your answer. "Peekay" has something to hide. He initially panicked because he saw that he had been caught out. But he saw a way out of it - to focus on irrelevant details - e.g., the "scrolling glitches".
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43. *I have caught "Peekay" out manufacturing drama.* He has no answer for these things. He can give you no sensible or satisfactory answer to the simple questions above. *That is why he is making it all about the "scrolling glitches".* The glitches turned out to be nothing *but they were never essential to my claims about him!*
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48.  
  49. The "scrolling glitch" and the "video player appearing before the browser" have since been satisfactorily reproduced and are thus ruled out. *They were never essential to the central claim.*
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. It does not follow that because the scrolling glitch has a natural explanation that "Peekay" was not being deceptive. He was being deceptive about something else. *The central claim had to do with the "view count" magically jumping from "333" to "351".*
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61. Upon scrutiny other oddities were found (such as the scrolling glitch) but they have all since been ruled out. This is important: *"Peekay" is focusing only on the details that have natural explanations! He is NOT responding to the central claim which is about the increased view count!* He will not answer the simple questions above.
  62.  
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. "Peekay" waited to see if I had pointed out his trick. When he saw that I had focused on incorrect details "Peekay" went on the attack. *It is easy to attack me if I have pointed out some incorrect details!*
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72.  
  73. All "Peekay" had to do was focus on the details I got wrong. Each of the "video glitches" turned out to be wrong. I have retracted those claims. *But at all times the central claim was to do with the increased view count.*
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. Answer honestly: have you heard "Peekay" explain how his video went from "333" views to "351" views? Of course not! "Peekay" will only say "I don't understand how YouTube works". But you don't need to understand it to know that view counts *do not magically increase without refreshing the page!*
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85. And so if his video had been taken down then refreshing the page won't give a higher number. *So how did he have the higher view count?* Because he had two tabs open! That was the trick. Since I didn't mention THAT specifically in my video he has assumed I didn't know about it and went on the attack.
  86.  
  87.  
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91. "Peekay" had one tab open with the video at "333 views" and the other tab open with "351 views". *THAT is where the manufactured drama occurred.*
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96.  
  97. The video/scrolling glitches turned out to be nothing so I have retracted those details. "Peekay" has still manufactured drama *because he pretended to receive the strike at "333 views"* (and he did that because he knows that some in his audience will think that is an "occult" number like "33" or "666").
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101.  
  102.  
  103. "Peekay" feigned SURPRISE at seeing "333" but he knew it was there all along. *He KNEW the view count was higher than 333 because it was open on another tab.*
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108.  
  109. Toward the end of his video he switched back to the wrong tab. Oops! But "Peekay" posted his video anyway because he doesn't care. He just doesn't care about his audience. He knows that most of them are clueless and wouldn't even notice.
  110.  
  111.  
  112.  
  113.  
  114.  
  115. *I have explained everything in a recent follow up post.* Please understand that I have spent a considerable amount of time contacting every single person who had left a comment on my 30 minute video. *I am doing this because I care.*
  116.  
  117.  
  118.  
  119.  
  120.  
  121. I don't recall seeing you there so you may not have seen it. I copied it to my Google Plus so please go and read it there.
  122.  
  123.  
  124.  
  125.  
  126.  
  127. Please read my follow-up post and get back to me if you have any questions.
  128.  
  129.  
  130.  
  131.  
  132.  
  133. "Peekay" has lied to you - he is manipulating you. He knows very well he didn't get a strike at "333" views. He knows very well that "Jeff Bauman" isn't "Nicolas Vogt". He knows very well the alleged "Virginia Shooting" wasn't done in two takes. *He is here feeding people disinformation.*
  134.  
  135.  
  136.  
  137.  
  138.  
  139. I have told only the truth. I stand by every claim I make. Every claim I make can be justified and substantiated. I take the time and trouble to explain everything to everyone - even to individual people who would otherwise hate on me.
  140.  
  141.  
  142.  
  143.  
  144.  
  145. "Peekay" is behaving like a guilty man who has been busted. Why else do you think he has gone on the attack like he has?! *Believe it or not YOUR beliefs MATTER to me.*
  146.  
  147.  
  148.  
  149.  
  150.  
  151. I hate liars and I hate people who intentionally mislead and deceive people. Therefore I hate scum like "Peekay". Please get back to me after having read the follow-up post here:
  152.  
  153. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/ffcvLrRC56A
  154.  
  155.  
  156.  
  157. __________________________________________
  158. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  159. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  160.  
  161. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  162. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  163.  
  164. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  165. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  166.  
  167. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  168. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment