Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Greg Malivuk
- http://www.pastebin.com/u/gmalivuk - notes from all classes
- ---
- Word Roots (list 5) - With your partner, try to think of one or two words to explain the meaning of each word root.
- morph (amorphous, metamorphosis) = shape/form
- multi (multicolored, multilayers, multilingual) = many (This is the Latin root.)
- nat (native, innate, natal) = birth
- neo (neoclassical, neocolonialism) = new
- nom/nym (nominate, misnomer, pseudonym) = name
- nov (innovate, novelty) = new
- nov (November) = nine
- ob/op (obstruct, object) = in front / opposite
- omni (omnipotent, omnidirectional, omnivore) = all (This is the Latin root.)
- optim (optimal, optimize) = best
- opt (optician, optometry) = light/vision
- paleo (paleontology, Paleolithic) = old (The opposite prefix is “neo”.)
- pan (panacea, panorama, pandemic) = all (This is the Greek root.)
- path (pathology, antipathy, empathy) = feeling/suffering (Many words that start with “patho” have to do with disease or sickness.)
- ped (pedestrian, pedicure) = foot
- ped/paed (pediatrician) = child
- peri (perimeter, peripheral) = around
- phil (philanthropy, philosophy, bibliophile) = love
- phob (arachnophobia, claustrophobia) = fear
- phon (phonograph, microphone, homophone) = sound
- photo (photograph, photosynthesis, photogenic) = light
- pod (podium, podiatry, tripod) = foot
- poly (polygon, polyglot) = many (This is the Greek root.)
- port (transport, portable) = carry (especially through something) / entry/exit
- post (posthumous, postpone) = after
- proto (prototype, proton, protocol) = first (“pro”, “pre”, “prim”, “fore”, “front” - all come from the same root)
- pseudo (pseudonym, pseudopod) = fake
- psych (psychopath, psychotherapy, psychology, psychiatrist) = mind
- pute (computer, dispute) = think/reckon (thinking logically to reach a conclusion)
- pyro (pyromaniac, pyrotechnics) = fire
- ---
- TOEFL Test: 4 hours, 4 sections, 120 points total, 30 per section, $200
- 1 reading: 60 or 80 minutes, 3 or 4 passages, about 14 questions about each passage
- 2 listening: 60-90 minutes, 2 or 3 sets, each set has 3 listenings, 17 questions, 10 minutes to answer
- (10-minute break)
- 3 speaking: 20 minutes, 6 tasks, 5.5 minutes of speaking time
- 4 writing: about 60 minutes total, 2 tasks, 20+30 minutes writing time
- ---
- BREAK
- ---
- Reading Question Types:
- - inference
- - purpose
- - vocabulary
- - reference
- - fact
- - negative fact
- - paraphrase
- - sentence insertion
- - summarize
- - organize/categorize
- ---
- Readers infer things. (“What can be inferred about ___?”)
- Authors imply things. (“What does the author imply about ___?”)
- ---
- Handout (Cambridge) p. 200-201 exercise R15 - Take 8 minutes to select the correct inferences that can be made from each sentence (sometimes more than one inference is correct).
- Compare your answers with your partner. If you disagree, convince your partner that you’re correct.
- 1 C
- 2 B D
- 3 B D
- 4 A B
- 5 B C
- 6 B D
- 7 A C
- 8 B (We don’t know C, because we don’t know that that’s why they used it 5000 years ago.)
- ---
- exercise R17 - Decide if each inference is correct. Then compare with your partners.
- 1 Yes
- 2 Yes
- 3 No - Things happening at the same time doesn’t mean one caused the other.
- 4 Yes
- 5 No
- 6 Yes
- ---
- Two common types of incorrect inference:
- Post hoc ergo propter hoc = it happened after, therefore it happened because of
- After seatbelts became mandatory, the number of car accident injuries in hospitals increased.
- Can it be inferred that seatbelts caused these injuries?
- No. Seatbelts saved lives, so now those people had injuries instead of dying in accidents.
- Cum hoc ergo propter hoc = They happened together, therefore one caused the other.
- There are far more sick people where there are doctors.
- Can we infer that doctors make people sick?
- No. Doctors go to sick people and sick people go to doctors, so of course they’re found together.
- ---
- p. 205-207 exercise R18 - Take 10 minutes to identify each statement as an Inference, a Restatement, or Neither.
- 1 I I R
- 2 I R I
- 3 R I R
- 4 R R R
- 5 I I N
- 6 R I N
- 7 I R R
- 8 R I I
- 9 R I R
- 10 I I N
- ---
- Homework: Cengage handout exercise 3.2 - All 42 questions.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment