Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2016-09-29 2315 +Phi D (Ducks on the River)
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Mint1JewWo&google_comment_id=z12ce14arlnnsjn0x22myzojyv20vh3av04
- https://pastebin.com/UYKYwYFh
- __
- +Phi D (Ducks on the River) __ 1) Belief in a flat Earth implies only a belief in a flat Earth. It does not follow that it would imply there is a creator any more or less than the existence of a ball Earth would imply a creator. (Both possibilities seem equally fantastic and deserving of a "creator" - don't they?)
- 2) I don't assert as a fact about reality that the Earth is flat. There is no "sufficient proof" [that which necessarily proves an event/claim to be true and real] for the claim of a flat Earth and so I cannot possibly assert it. Only retards and dishonest people assert as a fact about reality that the Earth is flat. Only a retard or dishonest person would remark: _"There does not exist a genuine image of Earth from space that isn't a composite *therefore* the Earth must be flat"._
- 3) Did you read the part where I wrote: _*Truth is presented in the same form as a lie*?_ We are in a *lie system* that has no problem presenting truth to the population when it is expedient. It simply does so in a way that forces the population to trust the story teller (by withholding sufficient proof - which is a simple and often natural kind of "censorship" that is achieved as easily as keeping swearing out of children's television programming). This is not controversial and can be readily observed for yourself. I have already hinted as to why this strategy would be the case.
- 4) The part about "world powers being in on the joke" is naïve. I must confine myself to a brief response so please try to understand: Lying (or presenting truth) in the way I have described is an effective strategy for making a population dependent upon the story tellers (via trust) and this strategy can occur to any intelligent person anywhere in the world.
- To give an off-the-cuff analogy: there are people who lie on insurance claims all the time. The successful ones will go about it in the same way (because it is successful). Does that mean they are all in cahoots? Maybe they are *but it does not necessarily have to be the case*.
- Simply because you can portray something as "requiring a Grand Conspiracy to work" and "therefore it is false" is *garbage thinking* that is promoted by propagandists so that it will be repeated by intellectually vulnerable people with low IQs when they deal with so-called "conspiracy theorists".
- It is a catch-all argument that should be rejected by thoughtful people because it means no grand conspiracy can ever exist _even when one does_.
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
