Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Apr 25th, 2018
270
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.29 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [10:41:23] <@RAS|> I love how +AAAMan proclaims with such confidence what someone he hates will do
  2. [10:44:12] <@barathron> @RAS| You don't think Trump will drop out of the Iran deal?
  3. [10:44:48] <+Zanadu> When is the 'due" date for that--someone said mid May?
  4. [10:45:12] JuanaTaco (~JuanaChat@JuanaChat.users.undernet.org) left IRC (EOF from client)
  5. [10:45:12] <@barathron> +Zanadu May 12
  6. [10:45:18] Jefferey_ (~trump111@mtrlpq4709w-lp140-01-70-30-220-150.dsl.bell.ca) left IRC (Ping timeout)
  7. [10:45:20] <@RAS|> I have no idea if he will drop out of the "deal' such as it is
  8. [10:45:31] JuanaTaco (~JuanaChat@73.115.54.169) joined the channel
  9. [10:45:31] JuanaTaco (~JuanaChat@73.115.54.169) left IRC (Registered)
  10. [10:45:31] JuanaTaco (~JuanaChat@JuanaChat.users.undernet.org) joined the channel
  11. [10:45:32] <@RAS|> They have not held up their end from what we have seen reported
  12. [10:45:32] <@barathron> well, time will tell
  13. [10:45:34] flux (~flux@76-253-73-219.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) left IRC (Quit: Lost terminal)
  14. [10:45:50] <@barathron> He seems keen to do it certainly
  15. [10:45:53] <@RAS|> So far all I have seen from the "deal" was us breaking all kinds of laws shipping them millions of dollars
  16. [10:45:55] nhscott (~nhscott2@69.6.135.107) joined the channel
  17. [10:46:00] LEB2000 (~LEB2000@208.180.35.38) left IRC (Ping timeout)
  18. [10:46:01] DuckDodgers sets mode +v JuanaTaco
  19. [10:46:09] <@RAS|> Do you want to support illegally paid for "deals"?
  20. [10:46:16] <@RAS|> is that your position?
  21. [10:46:26] DuckDodgers sets mode +v nhscott
  22. [10:46:31] <+millenialjen> http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/pro-gun-dating-site-uses-anti-gun-teen-david-hogg-to-lure-love-hunting-customers/
  23. [10:46:36] <@barathron> Its my position I don't know if you're correct or not
  24. [10:46:38] <@RAS|> Do you want to support "deals" that are not adhered to by the other party?
  25. [10:46:55] <@barathron> for me to answer that I'd have to presume your statement that laws were broken is correct @RAS|
  26. [10:46:58] <@RAS|> We KNOW that transferring the money that Obama did was illegal on many levels
  27. [10:47:08] <@barathron> Oh yeah? good
  28. [10:47:12] <@barathron> we'll see indictments then
  29. [10:47:18] <@barathron> odd they haven't happened yet
  30. [10:47:28] <@RAS|> he had the money paid in mutiple currencies to avoid the sanctions laws
  31. [10:47:48] <@RAS|> LOL Yea Like you expected Holder to indict Obama or anyone in his admin?
  32. [10:48:01] <@barathron> Newsflash: Holder isn't AG
  33. [10:48:19] <@barathron> we're a year and half into a new administration
  34. [10:48:27] <@RAS|> https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/08/iran-ransom-payment-president-obama-broke-law-sending-cash-iran/
  35. [10:48:45] <@RAS|> The president hoped to camouflage what he knew to be against the law in his dealings with Iran.
  36. [10:48:45] <@RAS|> Did it ever occur to President Obama to ask why he couldn’t just cut a check to the Iranian regime?
  37. [10:48:45] <@RAS|> Outrage broke out this week over the revelation that Obama arranged to ship the mullahs piles of cash, worth $400 million and converted into foreign denominations, reportedly in an unmarked cargo plane. The hotly debated question was whether the payment, which the administration attributes to a 37-year-old arms deal, was actually a ransom paid for the release of American hostages Tehran had
  38. [10:48:45] <@RAS|> abducted.
  39. [10:49:06] <@barathron> @RAS| well, will be interesting to see if the Trump admin does anything about that
  40. [10:49:14] <@RAS|> It is a waste of time to debate that point further. The Iranians have bragged that the astonishing cash payment was a ransom — and Obama has been telling us for months that we can trust the Iranians. The hostages were released the same day the cash arrived. One of the hostages has reported that the captives were detained an extra several hours at the airport and told they would not be
  41. [10:49:14] <@RAS|> allowed to leave until the arrival of another plane — inferentially, the unmarked cargo plane ferrying the cash.
  42. [10:49:21] <+millenialjen> http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/judicial-watch-new-hillary-emails-reveal-classified-documents-clinton-foundation-pay-to-play/
  43. [10:49:38] <@RAS|> So are you just wimmfully ignorant or is there more to you refusal to consider?
  44. [10:49:41] <@RAS|> Willfully
  45. [10:50:13] <@RAS|> The Wall Street Journal has reported that the Justice Department strongly objected to the cash payment to Iran. As we shall see, that should come as no surprise. What is surprising is the Journal’s explanation of Justice’s concerns: Department officials, it is said, fretted that the transaction looked like a ransom payment.
  46. [10:50:29] <@barathron> <@RAS|> So are you just wimmfully ignorant or is there more to you refusal to consider? <- sorry but the national review is not the be all, end all of facts for me @RAS|... in addition as you know that's an opinion piece
  47. [10:50:31] <@RAS|> At a press conference Thursday, Obama remarkably explained, “The reason that we had to give them cash is precisely because we are so strict in maintaining sanctions and we do not have a banking relationship with Iran.” Really Mr. President? The whole point of sanctions is to prohibit and punish certain behavior. If you — especially you, Mr. President — do the precise thing that the
  48. [10:50:31] <@RAS|> sanctions prohibit, that is a strange way of being “so strict in maintaining” them.
  49. [10:51:06] <@barathron> @RAS| I'm sure the Trump Administration will get to the bottom of it and indict all those responsible for breaking any laws
  50. [10:51:10] <+millenialjen> http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/04/25/teacher-accused-bullying-student-pushing-political-agenda
  51. [10:51:10] <@RAS|> Ahhhhh So since you do not WANT to consider the laws broken and it is written in an "opinion" piece - we should just ignore it all?
  52. [10:51:27] <@RAS|> I get it @barathron
  53. [10:51:40] <@RAS|> You would rather we chase and talk about NON Illegal Acts and witch hunt the current president
  54. [10:51:43] <@barathron> Of course you do... cuz you've decided what I think lol
  55. [10:51:47] <@barathron> YOu "get it"
  56. [10:51:51] <@RAS|> Party Before EVERYTHING
  57. [10:52:16] <@barathron> @RAS| we should just ignore it all? <- way to put words in my mouth I never said and then act as if I did -> <@RAS|> You would rather we chase and talk about NON Illegal Acts and witch hunt the current president
  58. [10:52:22] <@barathron> @RAS| do tell me more what I think 😕
  59. [10:52:44] <@RAS|> You sure seem to spend time going after the President over some 'collusion" when that is NOT EVEN A CRIME
  60. [10:53:02] Al` (~Al@bal8rog.users.undernet.org) joined the channel
  61. [10:53:12] <@barathron> @RAS| more words in my moth... find me using the word "collusion"
  62. [10:53:18] <@RAS|> Intellectually Dishonest
  63. [10:53:28] <@RAS|> Completely and utterly dishonest
  64. [10:53:30] <@barathron> <@RAS|> Intellectually Dishonest <- says the guy telling me what I think
  65. [10:53:32] DuckDodgers sets mode +v Al`
  66. [10:53:45] <@barathron> wow, you tell me what I think and then say I'm dishonest? lol
  67. [10:53:46] <@RAS|> I speak to what you portray here @barathron
  68. [10:53:52] RAS| sets mode +b *!*@barathron.users.undernet.org
  69. [10:53:56] <@barathron> no you put words in my mouth
  70. [10:53:57] Attempting to rejoin channel in three seconds
  71. [10:53:57] RAS| kicked barathron from the channel (Fuck Off)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement