Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-05 0105 +PartizaneProductions
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/E7dMecJA2Um
- https://pastebin.com/TwYGXEG2
- __
- +PartizaneProductions __ I've only now read your message here. The channels which are peddling the BS must be considered either the "enemy" or useful idiots of the enemy. They will mix in some truth with BS. I am telling you that SOMETHING DID HIT the buildings on 9/11. Twice. The idea ANY of the planes was CGI is a nonsense. I can justify what I am saying but it will require a moderately long post. The key point is this: *the lie system does not make mistakes.*
- In a nutshell what that means is: ANYONE could have had a camera aimed at the buildings. Had no planes hit then the camera would have recorded that fact.
- That would result in HARD evidence AGAINST the lie system.
- Hard evidence will be found ONLY with pranksters and criminal gangs/networks but NOT the lie system.
- A part of disinformation is to get people to accept ANYTHING that is fundamentally flawed. If you accept "no planes" then ALL of your conclusions will be flawed.
- There is no better example than the recent "Peekay" debacle. Because I incorrectly valued the "scrolling glitch" as significant it led me to a convincing but WRONG theory.
- The theory about using a "clone YouTube website" is not really falsifiable (and in time it may really be the case). But it came about because I tried to come up with an explanation to fit ALL of the evidence.
- If you accept "no planes" then it means you are looking at footage of a REAL plane (or "thing" made to look like a plane - but something *real* all the same) and perceiving it as CGI.
- If you are wrong (and it would be wrong according to my understanding of the lie system) then it has made you a little bit more insane. It makes you a little more prone to accepting the next REAL thing as CGI etc. (that is the danger).
- Ugh - I need to write this out better/properly again. I'll do a dedicated post in the future. The key point is this: *the lie system does not make mistakes.*
- After the first plane had hit the lie system has no way to control who was filming!
- But the lie system had no way to control who was filming with the first plane either! There could be some kid who for a private project is filming himself each day with the WTC in the background.
- If the planes were CGI then the lie system would be caught out. The lie system does not take that risk.
- The fact people like "Russianvids" might suggest ANY plane was CGI fits in with what we know about him: *he peddles disinformation!*
- Let me know what your gut reaction to the above is. I apologise that it has taken a day to see it!
- __________________________________________
- Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
- https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
- Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
- https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
- Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
