Humanity is Fucked

	A single man goes around hurting people in a village and doing whatever he wants. The man murders people, sexually assaults women, and is made to never lose in any competition. This man isn't even really the strongest man in the village, as the strongest man was murdered long ago. There are no rules here. There are no rules being enforced. Everything seems lawless until someone decides to contest the single man. At this point, you would think all of the people who are hurt by him would turn against him and get rid of him once and for all, being as it's merely one man. Something else happens instead. The village instead turns against the savior that tries to free the village.
	That story might sound like something from a third world country, but, it's not. It's the direction western civilization begins to go toward if left uninterrupted for too long. I hear stories about people who get raped and murdered in small towns, even today in the United States, just so the small town can protect the best player they have on a little sports team. thanks to the internet, people now can record things that go on and show the world, but, the world doesn't really care to watch. You kill a killer, rapist, kidnapper, doesn't matter because you can go to prison here for it as the private prison industry needs the money so bad that stopping crime is illegal. You witness a killer, rapist, kidnapper in the act, you get framed instead.
	Let me point out the real problem behind all of this. It's a problem that has plagued the United States for a very long time now called political corruption. If the leaders of your community decide to call someone a terrorist, do you ever decide to investigate the claims they make via other public channels of information? Say one day that a group of terrorist like people decide to come to your city and without making too much noise, replace the police force, mayor, and other city necessity jobs with themselves. Sure, it would be obvious that this wasn't the authentic people in charge in positions such as school teacher, but, lets say that those carreers were left alone. After a while, taxes drop, people start getting raises at work, money being spend on doing things the previous mayor wanted such as building condos that nobody will live in is now being spent on improving the quality of life for the public, foreclosed houses are given away for free to people who need them, and getting legal assistence you actually need becomes free. Years pass and nothing bad happens because crime rate went down and somehow the way the acclaimed terrorist group is running the show is more practical than the previous people in charge of the city.
	In a scenario like that, would you honestly sit there and hate the new people in charge? If those people aren't telling you what to believe or telling you what to do and life goes on as usual, but, better, are you really going to decide you need to take the city back from these terrorist? Most people would say that they wouldn't call these people terrorist. I'v heard, when presenting that short story to others, that these would be called saviors. The people saying this aren't people from third world countries, but, data mined from the United States. This should open peoples eyes up, but, people don't really care that terrorist could actually do such a thing in this day and age while this is the outcome of that situation. Instead, people make up little fantasies about stopping the bad guys at a young age, but, who are the bad guys exactly?
	In most civilizations, what people want and don't want is always what is good or bad in the end. It always normally becomes the law that something is bad because people don't want it unless political corruption has taken over democracy. Sometimes people don't want something because the television told them not to or because they heard they would get called a bad name if they wanted that. No matter how you swing the hatchet, this is corruption and it's domestic corruption that comes from the media or local government. The excuse of doing this that is made is that it makes people easier to control, but, the issue is that who has the audacity to say that they know so much better than you that you shouldn't be educated on making your own choices, but instead, should do what they are telling you to do? Does this sound like you aren't being manipulated by a corrupt civilization? There wasn't one, but, two election polls for electorial votes. Apparently electorial votes are more important than normal people votes, but, because someone won that wasn't deemed popular by the media, we had a revote. Is there even a legal process to decide a revote needs to be done?
	Don't be too surprised at the claims I'v made. Lets look at how the United States and every other country in the world was turned into a country in the past. Before going on a conquest, Europeans would normally be told that if people didn't speak their language, they were savage. People were purposely made to be xenophobic by the same people who tell you today who is or isn't a terrorist despite the definition of the word terrorist. Upon arriving at a new village, the new village would normally be peaceful and the new arrivals would offer technology or some peaceful form, but not always, of an excuse to occupy the new territory. Sometimes Europeans would claim that the territory they are taking over refuses to pay debt, even though this may or may not have been  true. In the end, territory is occupied by people who don't respect the natives to the land. Because of the communication gap and one sided xenophobia, the path of least resistence for normal societal functions after the leaders are cooped, was in favor of the invaders and not because they were the only ones killing people. Sometimes the technology superiority made the invaders the path of least resistence. Think about what a situation like this would actually do.
	Look in this world currently were people are occupying foreign land and not being hated by the people they occupy. What happened when the French occupied Germany in world war two? God forbid someone stands up for themselves to these international criminals. The locals can't even find a job in their own territory because the invaders occupying the territory and have taken over the jobs will always refuse to hire. People aren't necessarily forced out of their land, as there isn't anywhere for them to go. Instead, these people slowly fade away to economic genocide. This is the European way of taking over, but, it isn't really about technological advancements as much as it is about communication. Communication is the biggest tool in which a European warmonger goes about attacking more technically advanced societies while giving their own people the idea that they are more advanced because it's easier to communicate amongst themselves and not with the people they are invading. Pretty hard to stay calm when someone is trying to commit genocide against your race because they are lead by a corrupt leader.
	Now take a step back for a second and think about the things I'm saying here. Sure it's a hard pill for some to swallow, but, it's been made hard to swallow by the people pulling the strings. You get told people who somehow have survived with their way of life up to this point with the threat of you invading them constantly, are somehow inferior and yet you can't just invade their land and take over. If everybody else was savage and evil, why hasn't your own country purified them and made them better? Instead Iraq went from a first world country to a third world country and more than a majority of its own inhabitence are called terrorist and bombed in their own houses frequently because they won't let a foreign invader occupy their territory. Keep in mind that there no longer is weapons of mass destruction present in that country or else they would of already used it long ago against us being that we are constantly attacking them. I believe that many of these people we kill, really are terrorist, but, in the case of the innocent civilians caught in the termoil, do you really think we are going to give them a fair trial being that we will consider them guilty of being a terrorist by default?
	Let us look at the practical applications to the current paradigm we live in known as capitalism and its importance. Capitalism is both brilliant and sad at the same time, as it has potential that is never used because a few people who understand the back bone of capitalism, constantly abuse it by segregating undesirable people out right. The issue with this is that capitalism no longer serves its purpose the way it should, to preserve an empire longer than any other empire before it. You might not understand what I'm talking about, but, I'll go ahead and give it a try to explain.
	Take the experiment known as the mouse utopia for example. At first in the perfect conditions, the mice are in a state of utopia. The mice get along and everything works well until later generations when they all stop reproducing, hate each other, and die of old age or from killing each other. This happens no matter how much food or water there is, but, also when there is no personal space to get away for a while that the mouse have. This happened with the millenial generation in the United States almost, but, not quite. No matter how many times the experiment with the mice was done, the results ended the same. So what could have been done to the mice to help them avoid the state of hell they had at the end of the utopia? This is important to humans because humans who don't do what is practical and only do what they feel like, which is most of the ones I know, are essentially like the mice doing what their instincts tell them. The end result is the same, as they are about as productive as the mice in the cage.
	To make society continue to work, you take the state the experiment started in and use a lot of space toward this state. This is the most important state you can have in society, the beginning, as it is the state which allows us to stray away from the hell portion of the mouse utopia. The space is eventually going to run out, but, instead of merely keeping the mice there, you have a kind of eugenics ladder you create by forcing a percent of the mice to be kept in the hell state on purpose. You don't just send some to heaven and others to hell in the experiment, hell being over population, but instead, you create a bit of diversity based on how you would like to do the eugenics. Look at demographics at each city on the map in the United States. Most of one race will stay in one area of the map and move about as a race instead of just mixing all together. This may not entirely be true everywhere, but, it seems to be. You also have people in each race that are of different social classes. This is what seems to dictate who is in heaven or hell here in the United States. Clever social engineering seems to have done a very good job seperating us from each other and hopefully now you realize the paradigm at play here.
	The issue is that who gets to enjoy living in luxury? Another issue is that if our terrorist example from earlier is used in this version of society I'v presented to you, those who are on the brink of hell which is a large chunk of people, will end up flooding all layers of society in class liminality and maybe even race liminality. This might not seem like a problem at first until nobody is immune to new diseases because the genome isn't deviated enough between people, which since the genome is deviated enough between various honey bees, is what makes honey so bacteria proof. Another issue is that we would eventually end up in our mouse utopia. Society would lose everything. Technology may exist, but, nobody would have any reason to know how to use anything other than an assault rifle or gun. Technology would degrade and the ability to produce technology would be nearly gone by the time society begins to get its act together again. Capitalism may force people into a state of hell, but, not everybody at once.
	This doesn't actually mean that our version of capitalism is working, as the capital is in the ideology of currency. Anybody and their mothers could get their hands on currency, so the only way that capitalism today could exist is if there was a backbone unless the people who are bankers are the ones with all the currency. I don't believe this is the case because tax dollars oddly don't all go to paying off public debt. Instead, tax dollars get recycled into the economy most of the time and more money is made so that people can get paid to be productive without having to get paid less for the same job while some banker hordes their money despite already being rich. What I'm trying to say is that this isn't really capitalism, though it pretends to be, but, more along the lines of pseudo socialism. The majority of people who work have money go to feed other people and their children that are in a lower class. In a sense, the lower middle and lower class are really two parts of the same thing. I would even say that the lower middle class may be in more hell than the lower class, as they actually have enough hope to go to work despite the current state of affairs for this generation.
	Lets look at the upperclass. Generally own a lot of land, do have jobs most of the time, normally have a lot of free time to themselves, normally healthy and in shape, and generally in the condition the mice were at the beginning of the experiments. The issue however is that you can be rejected service in the United States by others if they feel like it. The judge doesn't have to judge in your favor even with some proof. People have too many things they aren't obligated to do. Cops don't have to arrest someone just because they assaulted you depending on what state you're in and can even wait until you defend yourself to arrest you for assaulting them instead. This doesn't sound like something that would happen to some people, because the people who have it nice, have it nice because people will naturally treat them nice. This is a matter of who we desire to move up and not a matter of who is the most practical human. This means to be rewarded, you have to be charismatic or presentable, if you will, as you will have more opportunities because others will give you those opportunities.
	In the mouse utopia experiment, the final generation of mice were called the beautiful ones. They were mice that were well groomed by themselves, stayed clean, and generally didn't fight very much with other mice. This is the generation in the human perspective that our society is naturally rewarding and moving up in the ranks toward that state in capitalism that is closest to the paradise state or beginning of the mouse utopia if you will. Our society is essentially forcing undesirable people into a lower class in a very passive manner while forcing people who seem more desirable into a higher class. The issue with this is that if people were properly placed demographicly speaking, there may be a completely different social hierarchy. This should be very important, as the housing market crash that happened twice in less than seven years played quite a huge role in the development of two entire generations. We now in the United States, have a forced precarious social class that fit the beautiful ones in the mouse utopia description just fine. These are the ones that end up being able to cry themselves into a cheif executive office position. Sure, this wouldn't really happen, but, who is going to replace the bosses that are practical when they are gone? If it wasn't for the policy list of a company, our society would be a mess right now and only desirable people would have jobs. This also accounts for how criminals are dealt with by judges and cops.
	So essentially our system we currently have, isn't entirely flawed, but, there is something underlining it in terms of who gets what power in the hierarchy overall. Most of the presidents or governors are close in many ways, which may be a class issue and not really so much of a relation issue. Many shady things happen in small towns that only a few people hear about that directly connect to some of these individuals. It is my theory that the biggest reason the United States is still bubblegum and taped together is because of an entire section of the United States population taking part in a completely seperate practical class. This doesn't consist of STEM degree holders, but, would have to consist of a black budget structure in our society which allows a group, probably large enough to populate a city, somewhere in the United States rather that be scattered about with special information logistics networks, or in some subterranian biodome. Other systems in our society involve people purposely being left out while others share a secret network of information. This is kind of what I believed to be true over the subterranian biodome, despite the whole game theory samson option scenario being easier to fix with subterranian biodomes.
	This information might sound baseless or irrelevant to some, but, I'm trying to begin a presentation about a system that would be practical and give everybody what they want. My family was raised in the hell section of society, which is mostly lower middle class people. At first, society had some things to block me from being abused financially, but, that's about it. The education system didn't teach me how to practically take part in society. The education system instead only told me basic skills that were so basic that I still don't know what standards in law that I should be allowed to hold myself to with reasonable treatment for not knowing any better about some laws if I wasn't a professional. I still couldn't find a job, but, I could join the army. When you have these perks at a young age, sure, you use them and things go good for a while, but, if you wait just long enough to reach thirty years of age and then try to use these perks, you would actually have the knowledge to use these perks to get somewhere in life. Instead, you're talked into using them earlier in life. This is wasteful and doesn't produce anything for the next generation.
	Let me get back to the mouse utopia for a second and explain something about existing systems for running this kind of utopia, as well as who gets to be in the utopia portion of the utopia and how it could be refined. The mouse utopia starts with a small population and abundant space with infinite food and water. This is seen as a utopia at its best. As the utopia goes on, it begins over populating and the population drops off. If we take this time chart of the mouse utopia and cut it into three slices, we have a system that could be used to base an empire off of that would function properly. For capitalism, it should be almost left as is, except for the fact that it's easier to go down the ladder than it is to go up, even for the people already at the top, and in fact maybe no way at all to go up unless you force yourself to the top. With this paradigm in play, communism would thus be impractical to last forever unless humans were immortal and stopped having children, merely because there would have to be a group of people in the paradise section of the human version of the mouse utopia for this to work. This means communist would have to put the younger people in the paradise zone because if they put the old people there, young people wouldn't have children. There would have to be two classes because people will overpopulate and someone has to go to the hell zone eventually of the mouse utopia. This means there would have to be more older people than younger people for this system to work and the older people would always be in the hell state. See how it becomes impractical in the long run?