API tools faq
paste
Lesta

16 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-13 1400 +nationalparksign

Lesta
Mar 12th, 2016
117
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.83 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-13 1400 +nationalparksign
  2. https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/JqqL91UW2eR
  3. https://pastebin.com/TaMjTpcr
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +nationalparksign __ Yes - the conclusion is important: *it is proof of nothing.*
  8.  
  9. If you watch when he "strikes" the ball at around 56s to 1m he seems to pick up pace. It is as though the whole thing was done quickly and then slowed down as you suggest.
  10.  
  11. Given that he hits the ball upwards such that he has to jump after it - *that would be a nice place to show us 3 minutes of somersaults.* ))
  12.  
  13. __
  14.  
  15.  
  16. Ask yourself: if it were you - in space - how would you have filmed this differently?
  17.  
  18. There are two things going on.
  19.  
  20. 1) It must be done in such a way so as to "show off some unique features of zero gravity".
  21.  
  22. and
  23.  
  24. 2) It must be done in such a way so as to make the cuts and edits seem "natural" (so that it remains doubtable if it is real and to disguise that it is fake if it isn't real).
  25.  
  26. __
  27.  
  28. The reason for the horrendously low quality is probably so we don't notice that the ball is spinning in different directions between cuts.
  29.  
  30. It is possible that more than one ball was used (thrown by an unseen person).
  31.  
  32. If they are forced to film it over a number of cuts then the spinning of the ball could give it away.
  33.  
  34. __
  35.  
  36. If the "ISS" were real and manned then you would "show off space" by "pitching" the ball down a long corridor. *Notice that when he threw the ball at the start he could have been much further back!*
  37.  
  38. We could have watched the ball travel for longer but we were deprived of that in a "clever way". By "pitching the ball to himself" they allowed a "clever cut" that would go unnoticed by an "ISS believer" because "it's real and he's just f_kcing around bringing us laughs from 400km above the Earth - what a hero - he isn't trying to prove he is in space".
  39.  
  40.  
  41. __
  42.  
  43. The other thing is - why not have a person pitch to a batter? Notice that "Scott Kelly" played "space ping pong" with himself. THAT ALONE tells you they are withholding sufficient proof.
  44.  
  45. If it were you there you'd have someone else to play "ping pong" with or play baseball with.
  46.  
  47. __
  48.  
  49. I don't know if the "ISS" is fake (not manned) because it is not possible to say. THAT is what reveals the lie system.
  50.  
  51. *If it's real then ANY of these clips could be done in a different way that made it impossible to doubt.*
  52.  
  53. But EVERYTHING we are shown is doubtable.
  54.  
  55. *What we see in this video has come from the mind of someone who is being careful to not PROVE he is in a permanent zero gravity environment.*
  56.  
  57. THAT is the point I am trying to make with my upcoming video. THAT is what should wake the world up.
  58.  
  59. It is not that there is a real or manned "ISS" - it is that these people - who seem to want us to think of them as their friends - are doing things in such a careful way that it SEEMS like proof but it isn't.
  60.  
  61. I have no idea why this isn't understood. I do think IQ is a factor.
  62.  
  63. You could take ANY video posted by "NASA" and redo it in such a way that it becomes undeniable.
  64.  
  65. No one doubts last year's Wimbledon tennis final winner. It is crazy to call that fake. But yet NOTHING we see from the "ISS" can cause us to relax and KNOW it is real.
  66.  
  67. From time to time I will do a YouTube search for "ISS" video. And then go several pages deep and click on a random video. And then watch until the first moment of something that allows it to be doubted.
  68.  
  69. I am sickened that EVERY VIDEO can be doubted. To stupid people who believe it - it's all real. But when you know what to look out for - it's ALL doubtable.
  70.  
  71. But it cannot be an accident. It cannot be a coincidence. It must be intentional.
  72.  
  73. It STRONGLY suggests there is no manned "ISS" but even that could be a trap. That in the end we MUST trust what we are told. But the instant we do that we are defeated - because we must then trust everything else. That's the point.
  74.  
  75. Anyway - rambled on a bit!
  76.  
  77. I might even offer some kind of reward to find footage that cannot be doubted.
  78.  
  79. I don't think it will ever exist because the whole point is to make it doubtable (just like every other lie system event and claim).
  80.  
  81. When this point is properly understood by people it SHOULD cause a revolution!
  82.  
  83. (I haven't had a chance to read over what I've written - pushed for time - hopefully it made sense!)
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. __________________________________________
  88. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  89. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  90.  
  91. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  92. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  93.  
  94. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  95. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  96.  
  97. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  98. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!