Miehen logiikka

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html><head>
<body style="font-family: monospace;">
<h1>Miehen logiikka</h1>
<p>The original sex of fauna is female. The male sex is a metasex intended for controlling the original sex.</p>
<p>Humans are capable of logical thinking and these differences of sex manifest as differences of gender in a way that can be logically expressed. I've already published a theory of how women think.</p>
<p>Women use logic in order to coordinate in a heuristic metaphysics. The traditional Western man who was found to be almost completely extinct after World War Two operated in a deductive metaphysics that was extremely specific. But universally, internationally, men can be said to operate in a heuristic metaphysics like women. However, the male metaphysics is narrower in scope.</p>
<p>In order to suffice as a man, a man must know 1/4th of the metaphysical territory that a woman should know.</p>
<p>In order to suffice as a man, a man must be more aware of priorities than a woman should be.</p>
<p>To know these right is more important than it is for a woman.</p>
<p>The following coordinate system can be superimposed on any quadrant of the metaphysical terrain a woman should know. However, it has been drawn as superimposed on the objective quadrant, which in socionics is called sensing.</p>
<p>It is said that the coordinate system is "superimposed" on another quadrant because the names of this coordinate system are supposed to be equally valid on all quadrants as long as FAIL is bad and SUCCEED is good.</p>
<p>It should be noted that men and women define success differently. The feminine standard of success is harsh and extremely difficult to achieve in comparison to the masculine standard of success. This is why women appear insincere in comparison to men.</p>
<p>A man who doesn't know some quadrant well doesn't lose masculinity when thralled by a woman so that the thralling is based on the woman's knowledge of a quadrant that is unknown to that man.</p>
<p>Women have no logical way of thralling a man who knows all quadrants and has no superior on any quadrant.</p>
<p>Would women want that?</p>
<p>
╋━━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━╈━━━━━━━━━╈━━━━━━━━┫<br />
┃NOTHING* ┃CURRENT ┃USUAL   ┃NORMAL   ┃ULTIMATE┃<br />
╋━━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━┫<br />
┃IMMEDIATE┃OBJECT  ┃TRY     │CORRECT  │SUCCEED ┃<br />
╋━━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━╅─────────┼────────┨<br />
┃CURRENT  ┃FORGET░░┃GOAL    ┃SOLUTION │IMPROVE ┃<br />
╊━━━━━━━━━╉────────╄━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━━╅────────┨<br />
┃AMBIENT  ┃MISTAKE▒│PROBLEM░┃SITUATION┃RIGHT   ┃<br />
╊━━━━━━━━━╉────────┼────────╄━━━━━━━━━╋━━━━━━━━┫<br />
┃EXTREME  ┃FAIL▓▓▓▓│WORSEN▒▒│WRONG░░░░┃CAUSE   ┖╮<br />
┻━━━━━━━━━┻━━━━━━━━┷━━━━━━━━┷━━━━━━━━━┻━━━━━━━┑♦│<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;╰─╯<br />
</p>
<ul><li><strong>AXIOM OF DIFFERENCE:</strong> (x,y) → ¬(y,x)</li>
<li><strong>AXIOM OF SUPREMACY:</strong> (x,y) ← (x-n,y-n)</li></ul>
<p><blockquote>* when ur thinking of pussy and someone asks what ur thinking</blockquote></p>
<p>If it makes sense for you to assume that you would need to obtain a license in order to be a man, then Islam is the new man card. But excellence has always been that.</p>
<p>If you're excellent you could, in theory, choose your gender, but in practice medicine isn't advanced enough for that yet. You aren't supposed to need a medical procedure for that if it's possible to change gender in an excellent manner. You could have a procedure for that but the procedure isn't supposed to be a medical one.</p>
<p>In any case there are double standards for objectivity. The objectivity that is universally expected of men is the objectivity described here. But in science objectivity means something else. Women are required to understand something about that.</p>
<p>If you don't know scientific objectivity you are masculine for requiring a woman to know that, but to know that doesn't make anyone feminine.</p>
<ul><li><strong>RULE OF SAFETY:</strong> Avoid thralling anyone who knows metaphysical territory you don't know.</li>
<li><strong>RULE OF SOLIDARITY:</strong> Avoid thralling your equals.</li>
<li><strong>RULE OF MASCULINITY:</strong> The origin of this coordinate system is CAUSE.</ul></li>
<p>Recommendation regarding children: Before children learn to thrall they should be taught a coordinate system whose origin is NOTHING.</p>
<p>This system is intended to be used for thralling women.</p>
<p>To do something you otherwise wouldn't appears dangerous.</p>
&nbsp;
<p>"COPYRIGHT" 2017 TUUKKA VIRTAPERKO<br />
ALL RIGHT(S) RESERVED</p>
</body></head></html>