opensrf@ubuntu-2604:~/OpenSRF$ valgrind --leak-check=full /openils/bin/srfsh
==16162== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==16162== Copyright (C) 2002-2024, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==16162== Using Valgrind-3.26.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==16162== Command: /openils/bin/srfsh
==16162==
==16162== Invalid write of size 8
==16162==    at 0x48F2017: add_history (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x48F542A: read_history_range (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x4003124: load_history (srfsh.c:314)
==16162==    by 0x4003124: main (srfsh.c:158)
==16162==  Address 0x8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==16162==
==16162==
==16162== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==16162==  Access not within mapped region at address 0x8
==16162==    at 0x48F2017: add_history (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x48F542A: read_history_range (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x4003124: load_history (srfsh.c:314)
==16162==    by 0x4003124: main (srfsh.c:158)
==16162==  If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==16162==  overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==16162==  possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==16162==  main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==16162==  The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==16162==
==16162== HEAP SUMMARY:
==16162==     in use at exit: 90,149 bytes in 196 blocks
==16162==   total heap usage: 1,108 allocs, 912 frees, 222,267 bytes allocated
==16162==
==16162== 4 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1 of 94
==16162==    at 0x4855858: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:447)
==16162==    by 0x4B6424E: sdsnewlen (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B68685: redisBufferWrite (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6BF32: redisGetReply (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6C02F: redisvCommand (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6C0F9: redisCommand (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4887955: transport_con_connect (transport_connection.c:96)
==16162==    by 0x487BB52: osrf_system_bootstrap_common (osrf_system.c:470)
==16162==    by 0x4002C79: main (srfsh.c:114)
==16162==
==16162== 14 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 10 of 94
==16162==    at 0x485D07F: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1804)
==16162==    by 0x4B64F2B: sdsMakeRoomFor (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6580B: sdscatlen (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6B19C: redisReaderFeed (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6B335: redisBufferRead (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6BF61: redisGetReply (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6C02F: redisvCommand (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4B6C0F9: redisCommand (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhiredis.so.1.1.0)
==16162==    by 0x4887955: transport_con_connect (transport_connection.c:96)
==16162==    by 0x487BB52: osrf_system_bootstrap_common (osrf_system.c:470)
==16162==    by 0x4002C79: main (srfsh.c:114)
==16162==
==16162== 65 (24 direct, 41 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 60 of 94
==16162==    at 0x4855858: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:447)
==16162==    by 0x48F06EC: xmalloc (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x48F09BE: alloc_history_entry (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x48F2008: add_history (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x48F542A: read_history_range (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.8.3)
==16162==    by 0x4003124: load_history (srfsh.c:314)
==16162==    by 0x4003124: main (srfsh.c:158)
==16162==
==16162== 4,651 (24 direct, 4,627 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 93 of 94
==16162==    at 0x4855858: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:447)
==16162==    by 0x488A18F: safe_malloc (utils.c:43)
==16162==    by 0x487EC7B: osrfConfigInit (osrfConfig.c:113)
==16162==    by 0x487B8EE: osrf_system_bootstrap_common (osrf_system.c:375)
==16162==    by 0x4002C79: main (srfsh.c:114)
==16162==
==16162== LEAK SUMMARY:
==16162==    definitely lost: 48 bytes in 2 blocks
==16162==    indirectly lost: 4,668 bytes in 62 blocks
==16162==      possibly lost: 18 bytes in 2 blocks
==16162==    still reachable: 85,415 bytes in 130 blocks
==16162==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==16162== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==16162== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==16162==
==16162== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==16162== ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 5 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault         (core dumped) valgrind --leak-check=full /openils/bin/srfsh