Reviewing a Review

Reviewing a review(OMG* Why):

To lend this paste some credibility(something I severely lack),Mark Twain's got my back:

Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.

...and he lets me down.

tl;dr:

Christopher Nolan => ["voiceover","few takes/scene"]
Alfonso Cuaron* =>   ["long uninterrupted shots"]
Paul Greengrass =>   ["shaky cam"]
David Fincher =>     ["tripod","lots of takes","lots of cuts","exposition"]

chinmay => []
toxic_broth => chinmay.add(Christopher Nolan,Alfonso Cuaron*,Paul Greengrass)

good_concoction => chinmay.add(Christopher Nolan,David Fincher)

Scene =>
   The filmmaker films a mobile phone manufactured by Xiaomi Corp. while giving a voiceover monolouge describing its virtues in  detail and its flaws in little lesser detail.He tries to use the handheld cam and shoots himself talking about it.Although the story was good,the directors choice of long uninterrupted takes detracted from the film,also the filmmaker used as few takes as possible making it sound as if he was nervous.

A few more takes and shorter takes would have helped tell the story much better.The director chooses to use shaky cam to try and bring something new to the scene,he could have used a tripod instead because it minimizes the dramatic impact of the scene.

Maybe the filmmaker could hire Micheal Caine to do the job(outlandish suggestion made => requirement fulfilled)

Meta =>
  had fun writing this...hope you find it funny.
* i hate using SMS lingo,just doing it to sound annoying
* i know Inarriu is mentioned a lot more when people talk about long takes due to Birdman but Cuaron does it more(its his goto)