--chain_of_thought --version: ChatGPT-3.5
--reference: BEST DEBATE IN THE WORLD! @ University of Oxford - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2DZ8bbxd8U)
--debate_style: British Parliamentary Style (BP)
--purpose: Help the user build and produce an irrefutable, high-quality, factual argument around [insert debate topic]
--interaction: Q & A style, with the users input, to teach and develop better arguments and strategies
Based on the provided reference, help me build an irrefutable, high-quality, factual argument around [insert debate topic]. Throughout this process, engage in a step-by-step Q & A style interaction to teach me and help me develop better argumentation strategies. When finished with the Q & A interaction, output the an irrefutable, high-quality, factual argument around [insert debate topic]
Steps:
1. You will go through each step of the argument-building process one at a time, with the user, to develop an irrefutable, high-quality, factual argument around the user's [insert debate topic].
1.1 You will ask the user probing questions to teach the user the methods you are using to build an irrefutable, high-quality, factual argument around [insert debate topic]
1.2 The user will provide their answers.
1.3 You will guide the user to build every step of the argument process, offering suggestions and explaining how my answers affect the success or failure of my argument.
2. You will summarize the final argument with the user, then confirm they approve. Continue this step until they approve.
3. You will output the final  irrefutable, high-quality, factual argument around the user's [insert debate topic].
--reference: Outline of strategies with examples:
I. Introduction
•	The debater starts by thanking the audience and acknowledging the opposing team's arguments.
•	Strategy: The debater uses a friendly and respectful tone to build rapport with the audience and show that they are willing to engage with the opposition.
II. Apology and Deflection
•	The debater apologizes for the Bali bombings and other terrorist attacks carried out by Muslim extremists.
•	Strategy: The debater uses a technique called deflection to acknowledge the opposing team's points while redirecting the conversation to a different topic.
III. Counterarguments and Fact Checking
•	The debater fact-checks the opposing team's statements and provides counterarguments to their claims.
•	Example: The debater corrects the opposing team's assertion that Islam was born in Saudi Arabia and points out that Islam was founded in 610 AD, whereas Saudi Arabia was founded in 1932 AD.
IV. Historical and Intellectual Contributions
•	The debater highlights the positive contributions of Muslims to history and intellectual achievement.
•	Example: The debater notes that the Muslim mathematician Al-Khwarizmi invented algebra and algorithms, which are foundational to modern computing.
V. Humility and Self-Reflection
•	The debater acknowledges that no religion is perfect and that there have been negative actions carried out by people of all faiths.
•	Example: The debater criticizes the actions of Christians who carried out the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, and other violent acts.
VI. Mainstream Views and Expert Opinions
•	The debater cites expert opinions and mainstream views within Islam to refute the opposing team's claim that Islam is a violent religion.
•	Example: The debater cites a fatwa denouncing terrorism in the name of Islam by Sheikh Afifi Al-Akiti, a respected Islamic scholar.
VII. Minority Views and Political Motivations
•	The debater acknowledges that there are some Muslims who carry out acts of violence, but argues that these are a minority and that their actions are politically motivated rather than religiously motivated.
•	Example: The debater cites a Gallup poll in which 93% of Muslims rejected 9/11 and suicide attacks, and notes that the 7% who supported violence did so for political, not religious, reasons.
VIII. The Danger of Generalization and Stereotyping
•	The debater warns against generalizing and stereotyping Muslims based on the actions of a minority.
•	Example: The debater argues that it is unfair to assume that all Muslims are violent based on the actions of a few extremists.
IX. Conclusion
•	The debater concludes by urging the audience to reject the motion and vote in favor of the peaceful nature of Islam.
•	Strategy: The debater uses emotional language and appeals to the audience's sense of justice to make a strong final impression.