14 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-01 0035

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-01 0035
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acsyb0Krk1Y&google_comment_id=z132ezowtluchp3bi04ccjgxsr3cdn1xfgk
https://pastebin.com/SRug73UL
__

+Brian Hill __ So according to you I *did* acknowledge you for the "BBC" clip but then went on to deny it. Tell me, "Brian Hill" - *does that sound like something Lesta would do*?

Why would I acknowledge you for something *and then* go on to deny it?

If you were the one to point something out WHY would I then say otherwise?

Is that something I am in the habit of doing, "Brian Hill"? Do you see me doing that elsewhere? *Or has it just been with you*?

Do you have any clue how paranoid you are? If I did what you say I did then you would be the only person I have done it to. What makes you so special?

Are you CERTAIN that's what I did? Are you POSITIVE that's what I did?

Did I specifically say: *"Brian Hill did not discover the Chris Hadfield clip - Lesta did!"*

Is that really what I wrote? *Ever*?

_No it f_kcing well isn't_.

You have repeatedly accused me of deleting a thread which I never deleted. It's okay for you to make one bullsh!t accusation after another, isn't it? *Have you ever apologised for the bullsh!t accusations you throw at me*?

You have accused me of working with "NASA". *Have you ever apologise for that*?

You have accused me of working with "Peekay". Have you ever apologised for that?

Do you want me to spend a day hunting down all the bullsh!t accusations you've made against and about me? Do you want me to list them all and stack them up against this one you're making against me?

*Do YOU ever apologise for ANYTHING*?

With you it's just one accusation after the other. *And when that accusation turns out to be bullsh!t you invent another*.

_And that's what you've done here_.

You have taken something and TWISTED it to have the meaning you WANT it to have.

This can be cleared up - but only if you're a SANE, REASONABLE and HONEST person. But I don't believe you are. *I believe you're paranoid and unhinged*. Everything indicates that you are. All you will do is latch onto the next accusation. And then the next and then the next. _It won't ever stop_.

It won't stop because you're "convinced" that "Lesta is a professional deceiver". Do you remember writing this to Terran:


"BRIAN HILL": *"It dawned on me that Lesta might be a professional deceiver. I am convinced of it now actually."*


Even when this bullsh!t about "denying you acknowledged the Chris Hadfield BBC clip" is cleared up *WILL YOU EVER APOLOGISE FOR THAT*?

No you won't. You'll sit on the sidelines and wait for the next bit of bullsh!t you can interpret the wrong way.

How many other people would have blocked you by now? ALL OF THEM!

__

I know *exactly* where your retarded and paranoid brain has gotten *confused*.


*Your issue is with Terran and not me* and he *APOLOGISED TO YOU* immediately after.


I have *NEVER* denied you acknowledged the "Chris Hadfield" clip. *NEVER. NEVER F_KCING EVER*.

You have taken a SINGLE LINE I wrote in a SCREENSHOT and INTERPRETED IT TO SUIT YOUR PARANOIA YOU F_KCING SCUMBAG AND SPASTIC.

The following is what Terran wrote to you. It is from Terran that you got it into your WORTHLESS and PARANOID little brain that I had denied you were the one to find the "Chris Hadfield" BBC clip.



Read over it SLOWLY.



TERRAN: "You didn't make Lesta aware of that Cox segment. He already covered that when it happened!"

"BRIAN HILL": "You  piece of lying trash said ¨way to go Brian¨  when I made Lesta aware what the astronaut did during that cox interview are you going to fucking deny that?!"

TERRAN: "*OK, my memory may be faulty on that topic. I apologize if that's the case*."



__


If you look at that thread *I never gave a plus one to what Terran wrote*.

I did not participate in that thread any further.

*AND THAT THREAD TOOK PLACE AFTER THE SCREENSHOT YOU ARE REFERRING TO*.

That's important, "Brian". Do you know why it's important? It's important *BECAUSE I NEVER EVER F_KCING DENIED YOU POINTED OUT THE "CHRIS HADFIELD" BBC CLIP*.

What I wrote in my screenshot DIDN'T MEAN what your RETARDED and PARANOID and WORTHLESS brain thought it meant. But your retardation and paranoia allowed you to reinforce that *erroneous belief* ONCE TERRAN WROTE WHAT HE DID TO YOU (which he then apologised for).

__


But I bet you're still confused. I bet you still think I "denied" it.

*Do you realise you were NEVER WRITING TO ME*? You were talking to MsKickup.

Do you know why that's important? I bet you don't. *You're too stupid to f_kcing figure anything out*.

Here's what she wrote to you:



MSKICKUP: "No one has missed that nasa himself acts upon lestas videos in many ways."

(Do you understand that MsKickup has likely seen ALL of my "NASA" videos? Including ALL of the "NASA reacts to Lesta" videos"? Do you understand that I have posted NUMEROUS "NASA RESPONDS" videos? *Do you think YOUR observation was the ONLY one*? That's important, "Brian". Though for reasons you have too low of an IQ to understand.



*Here is your reply to her*:


"BRIAN HILL": "Uhhm, *who pointed one of those out to Lesta* - which Lesta than used in one of his videos? How do you know that Lesta is not in bed with NASA???"



And here is MY reply to THAT:



LESTA: "Yeah - how do you know Lesta isn't in bed with "NASA"! I mean - I am working with "Peekay" right? How do you know I am not secretly working with YOU?!"



What do you notice is missing, "Brian"?

In my reply did I deny you pointing anything out?

What was I focused on with that reply? I sure seemed focused on the bullsh!t claim you made about me working with "NASA" *but I did not say a WORD about you not pointing anything out*.


*Let's recap*.


1. You accept that I HAVE acknowledged you pointing out the "Chris Hadfield" clip. (So why the f_kc would I then deny it??)


2. You THEN accused me of deleting the thread where I acknowledged you *EVEN THOUGH I DID NO SUCH THING*. (You rotten piece of work. You throw one accusation after another you scumbag.)


3. Later on you mentioned to MsKickup that you were responsible for pointing something out to me that was used in a video. *And HOW was she supposed to know WHICH ONE, "Brian"*? (That's the f_kcing point.)


4. ONLY AFTER THAT did Terran state that I had found the "Chris Hadfield" BBC clip independently *BUT IMMEDIATELY APOLOGISED TO YOU for having a potentially FAULTY MEMORY*.


5. In response to what you wrote to MsKickup *I DID NOT SAY A SINGLE WORD about you having NOT pointed anything out*.


So think about it, "Brian Hill".


I *have* acknowledged you.

I have *never* STATED YOU DID NOT POINT OUT THE "CHRIS HADFIELD" BBC CLIP. (*But Terran did*!)

You later went on to say that I supported Terran's comments (another f_kcing bullsh!t accusation you have made about me that is NOT TRUE). *I DID NO SUCH THING*. I did not participate any further on that thread *AND I DID NOT PLUS ONE ANY OF TERRAN'S COMMENTS* - especially not the one where he said I discovered it by myself.

Your PARANOIA has let you interpret things the way YOU want them to be.

__

So what is this coming down to?

It is coming down to how your RETARDED and PARANOID brain has managed to interpret a SINGLE LINE on a screenshot as CATEGORICALLY MEANING that I DENIED you acknowledged the CHRIS HADFIELD BBC CLIP.

So I'm now going to explain what I meant with that single line to you. If you're a sane, reasonable and intelligent person this won't be a problem for you. If you're UNHINGED then you will do what you've been doing for WELL OVER A YEAR and simply shift the goal posts. You'll just invent a NEW accusation - because you NEED to see me as a "professional deceiver".


__


Lets' now take a look at what I wrote in the screenshot. And keep in mind - you have been harbouring THIS grudge against me *for well over 10 months - all because OF A SINGLE LINE in a screenshot you have NOT UNDERSTOOD*.

(I'm curious though - why didn't you bring this sh!t up 10 months ago when it happened? Why did you wait a few months?)


Here is that line from the screenshot:


LESTA: "Brian Hill trying to take credit for Lesta's observations"

And I pointed to your message to MsKickup. Your conversation with her (not me).


*So what did I mean*?


Slow down. You need to go over the following SLOWLY. Your retarded and paranoid brain is going to want to fight and resist and argue - but you need to ACCEPT that what I wrote *DID NOT* mean what you THINK it meant.


Notice how I used the word "OBSERVATIONS" - that's *PLURAL*.

Have you made MULTIPLE observations which I have then gone on to use in videos? NO, YOU HAVE NOT.

*So what did I mean by it*?

Imagine I have posted 1,000 "NASA RESPONDS" videos. And suppose you had pointed ONE of those out. *Now imagine every time someone says "NASA responds a lot to Lesta" and you reply _"Yeah - and I pointed out one of those!"_*

>>> BUT WHICH ONE, "BRIAN"? <<<

Of the THOUSAND which one did YOU point out?

When someone is watching a "NASA RESPONDS" video - are they watching one that "Brian Hill" has pointed out? Is that what they're watching? How would they know they're not?

Since you have pointed out ONE of them - ANY of them could have been due to you, right?

I'm not sure you can understand the subtleties and nuances of what I've just written. But I will carry on anyway. I'll now explain how you could have gone about it differently and gotten a different outcome:

Now imagine instead you had written to MsKickup:


"ALTERNATE BRIAN HILL COMMENT":
"Yeah - but I pointed out one - *the Chris Hadfield BBC clip one*".

Do you see what's different here? This time you're being SPECIFIC. This time you're saying WHICH ONE. This time you've narrowed down from ONE THOUSAND to just ONE.


DO YOU THINK I WOULD HAVE WRITTEN *"Here is Brian Hill taking credit for Lesta's observationSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS"*? If you had been SPECIFIC with WHICH ONE?

If you had been SPECIFIC do you think I would have written a PLURAL: "observsationSSSSSS"?????????

In fact - *do you think I would have included the line at all*?

If you had been SPECIFIC then there is no way to have written you were taking credit for my "NASA responds" observationS.

Now keep thinking about it. If you had been specific AND I then wrote: *"Here is Brian Hill taking credit for Lesta's observation"* THEN YOU WOULD HAVE A POINT! THEN YOU WOULD BE CORRECT!

>>> But that is NOT what happened. <<<

Had that happened and you said to me: _"Uh, hang on Lesta - I was the one to point it out!"_ *I would have replied: _"Oh really? When and where?"_*

>> I would have then CHECKED. <<

>> I would have then CONFIRMED you were right. <<

*AND THEN I WOULD HAVE F_KCING RETRACTED WHAT I WROTE AND APOLOGISED YOU F_KCING PARANOID DUMMY*.


And I have done that kind of thing before you PARANOID F_KC.


It would not surprise me if you still don't understand what I have written so I'll give the simplest possible example I can:

Imagine you had posted 1,000 videos to your channel. Imagine someone said "Hey, I really like those videos by Brian Hill" and imagine I replied: "Yeah - I made one of them for him".

Which one? The person who I have written that to suddenly has a seed of doubt? "Am I watching the video Brian made or Lesta made"?

It's even worse. If you have at least one video made for you by Lesta - then what's to say you haven't let other people make videos for you?

How can we be sure that ANY of the videos you posted are your own work? Maybe Lesta made one. Terran made another. NPS made another and so forth.

Do you understand? If you aren't being SPECIFIC then you are planting a seed of doubt. You are TACITLY taking credit for EVERYTHING I have posted by way of "NASA RESPONDS" because ANY OF THEM could been yours.

__

This is why I stopped including observations and clips that other people have pointed out to me. Because they get like you.

You make ONE observation and they feel like they have done EVERYTHING.

You talk about my ego but you can't even let this go.

__

I have wasted WAY too much time on you. *You are not here for the right reasons*.

You are an agitator.

You're constantly nit-picking and arguing.

You are CONSTANTLY paranoid. You are constantly doing THIS.

You have an oppositional defiance disorder. F_kc you.

Everything has been EXPLAINED to you above. If you persist with this BULLSH!T claim that I denied acknowledging you then you are f_kced in the head.

__

TO SUMMARISE:

"Brian Hill" accuses Lesta of all kinds of sh!t ALL THE TIME that ALWAYS turns out to be BULLSH!T but yet he NEVER apologises - *HE JUST MOVES ON TO THE NEXT WORTHLESS ACCUSATION*.

You are a time-waster. 100% time-waster. *F_KC OFF*.


_(Edited to fix two typos)_




______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.