Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jun 22nd, 2017
69
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.69 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. Trust37 - Last Tuesday at 22:58
  3. nope that's false
  4. atleast the version number was changed quite often
  5. so there must be atleast one update
  6. DurtyFree - Last Tuesday at 22:58
  7. They already released several hotfixes
  8. But I am not sure if they are still doing anything(edited)
  9. Trust37 - Last Tuesday at 23:00
  10. well they have tons of devs
  11. atleast one of them should be doing something
  12. it sounds pretty fishy to me
  13. "no changes etc"(edited)
  14. maybe it's just a house of cards until they move to rage
  15. DurtyFree - Last Tuesday at 23:05
  16. Properly yes
  17. razzkulz - Last Tuesday at 23:08
  18. Trust will never stop talking about them changing version numbers :joy: :joy: :joy:
  19. #constantattack
  20. Missy - Last Tuesday at 23:41
  21. @DurtyFree so he said he'd send a list where is it
  22. Fucking "wow emulators" is a stupid term btw it's just a "private server"
  23. Just call it what it is
  24. ffs
  25. Emulators are for consoles, NES, SNES, whatever
  26. Unless they are literally re-implementing WOW for some reason
  27. @Trust37 Why do you think that
  28. That'd be way too smart for GTAN
  29. xD
  30. Also that's a TERRIBLE way to do things
  31. You get a dev on the team
  32. The dev would expect activity
  33. If there's none, there is no motivation for said dev
  34. I mean I know Adam has been suppsoedly working offline
  35. For some fucking reason
  36. Because he's a fucking idiot
  37. (btw I'm drunk atm so I'm vocal)
  38. lol
  39. June 21, 2017
  40. razzkulz - Last Wednesday at 00:21
  41. Hahahaha
  42. Enjoying your Tuesday night I see
  43. Missy - Last Wednesday at 01:25
  44. Let me enjoy my game launch dammnit
  45. Anyway goodnight
  46. Msk - Last Wednesday at 16:54
  47. @Missy what's your idea?(edited)
  48. Missy - Last Wednesday at 16:55
  49. My idea is to manually patch SHV to replace the hash table
  50. razzkulz - Last Wednesday at 18:46
  51. Is it hard to do that?
  52. I understood that AB just had to tweak a few things here and there to make SHV compatible again
  53. Didn't sound too complicated
  54. Trust37 - Last Wednesday at 18:48
  55. but are we allowed to do such changes?
  56. Missy - Last Wednesday at 19:59
  57. Dunno
  58. But yeah i think this update it's just the hash map
  59. Which should hopefully just be a search and replace
  60. June 22, 2017
  61. Msk - Yesterday at 16:44
  62. So, Scripthook is updated, we're not closing the project :smile:
  63. razzkulz - Yesterday at 16:48
  64. SHV got updated guys, this is a very good sign
  65. Msk - Yesterday at 16:50
  66. Indeed
  67. razzkulz - Yesterday at 16:51
  68. If AB, who was part of the OpenIV team that got a C&D is still continuing his project, so should we
  69. Remember that T2 released a statement wherein they said that they were targeting OpenIV because of allowing exploitation in GTA Online
  70. We have nothing to do with GTA Online, we can stay alive and continue
  71. Missy - Yesterday at 16:52
  72. OpenIV had nothing against GTAO either
  73. Trust37 - Yesterday at 16:52
  74. openiv was just used
  75. it's not their fault
  76. razzkulz - Yesterday at 16:54
  77. I'm not saying that OpenIV was guilty of what they were accused of
  78. I'm merely mentioning what their statement is and how it reflects on us(edited)
  79. Msk - Yesterday at 16:56
  80. We should continue with project maintenance and updates
  81. Missy - Yesterday at 16:56
  82. It doesn't reflect on OpenIV either so that's a weird statement :stuck_out_tongue:
  83. razzkulz - Yesterday at 17:00
  84. It was directly issued to OpenIV, how does it not reflect on them?
  85. Plus I never mentioned that it reflected on OpenIV in the first place
  86. Only how it reflects on us
  87. Trust37 - Yesterday at 17:01
  88. but we shouldn't push the updated shv until shv is public available
  89. Missy - Yesterday at 17:03
  90. Agreed ^
  91. Just out of respect for AB
  92. :shrug:
  93. Trust37 - Yesterday at 17:03
  94. and because of the readme
  95. ; THIS ARCHIVE REDISTRIBUTION IS NOT ALLOWED, USE THE FOLLOWING LINK INSTEAD
  96. ; http://www.dev-c.com/gtav/scripthookv/
  97. razzkulz - Yesterday at 17:05
  98. Sounds good
  99. But doesn't this spark up just a tiny bit of hope in you guys? :innocent:
  100. Missy - Yesterday at 17:07
  101. For?
  102. razzkulz - Yesterday at 17:10
  103. GT-MP
  104. DurtyFree - Yesterday at 21:20
  105. Who @here gave internal and false informations to Hardy?
  106. I want some honest answers now
  107. He can't know without anybody from here leaking it
  108. Trust37 - Yesterday at 21:23
  109. http://puu.sh/wrBwx/6cc4a1fbce.png
  110.  
  111. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  112. DurtyFree - Yesterday at 21:24
  113. @razzkulz @Msk Anything you would like to tell me?
  114. Msk - Yesterday at 21:42
  115. Yeah, we don't need your drama right now
  116. I would be the last person shutting this down if there is a chance for it to stay alive
  117. please :joy:
  118. for the whole week the situation was critical, you were risking the whole fate of this project
  119. threatening to take everything down with you since saturday
  120. and talking with you, providing any arguments and searching for options was pointless on that matter.
  121. You had your mindset, and that mindset was to literally fuck whole community and said to them "We're afraid and immediately closing everything down"
  122. DurtyFree - Yesterday at 21:46
  123. Please read #staff, there are all answers you need
  124. Msk - Yesterday at 21:46
  125. and your answers are here
  126. :shrug:
  127. Missy - Yesterday at 23:34
  128. @DurtyFree Get on nimz ts when u have time pls
  129. DurtyFree - Yesterday at 23:34
  130. Yes
  131. Missy - Yesterday at 23:36
  132. 1 thing, maybe you didn't notice that you were also quite vocal about your position when discussing SHV in #general - it's not far fetched to assume things
  133.  
  134. Trust37 - Yesterday at 23:38
  135. indeed
  136. DurtyFree - Yesterday at 23:40
  137. You are right, this wasnt good
  138. Missy - Yesterday at 23:54
  139. So why razz
  140. Why was he banned
  141. DurtyFree - Yesterday at 23:55
  142. Just out of safety reasons
  143. I am going to talk to him
  144. He is a close friend of Msk so I wasn't entirely sure if he planned something with him
  145. But I am already writing with him(edited)
  146. Missy - Yesterday at 23:56
  147. That's a little pre-mature..
  148. June 23, 2017
  149. DurtyFree - Today at 00:13
  150. @razzkulz Is back
  151. Missy - Today at 00:16
  152. Great
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement