theunpromisedone3

STRATFOR E-Mail #24: Re: [alpha] INSIGHT - CZECH REPUBLIC -

Feb 27th, 2012
291
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.68 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Re: [alpha] INSIGHT - CZECH REPUBLIC - BMD, US, Russia, military & more - CZ103 & CZ104
  2. Email-ID 117802
  3. Date 2011-09-02 22:31:54
  4. yea, the CzRs are nervous about someone like McFaul messing it up.
  5. btw, he was at the dinner I went to last night... the Uzbeks were falling
  6. all over themselves to speak with him.
  7. On 9/2/11 2:01 PM, Eugene Chausovsky wrote:
  8.  
  9. This is fascinating stuff. You can how much the C. Europeans want the
  10. Intermarium to materialize, all with the explicit backing of the US.
  11.  
  12. The question is how willing with the US be to go along with this F-16
  13. plan...
  14.  
  15. On 9/2/11 12:27 PM, Marc Lanthemann wrote:
  16.  
  17. Link: themeData
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21. CzR = Czech Republic
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25. CODE: CZ103 & 104
  26. PUBLICATION: yes
  27. ATTRIBUTION: Stratfor sources in Prague/Washington
  28. SOURCE DESCRIPTION:
  29.  
  30. 103 - Deputy to the Czech Ambassador; moving in Oct to be deputy FM
  31.  
  32. 104 - Czech security attache
  33.  
  34. (Ambassador stopped in for a few min)
  35.  
  36. SOURCE RELIABILITY: B
  37. ITEM CREDIBILITY: 3
  38. DISSEMINATION: Alpha
  39. HANDLER: Lauren
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45. The CEs need NATO. Plain and simple. They need a functional NATO. And
  46. they need NATO to return to its primary focus-containment of the large
  47. threat (Russia), and protection of the NATO land (them). Containment
  48. has to be the primary focus for NATO. No matter who you are, if you're
  49. in NATO, you need to understand this.
  50.  
  51. CzR doesn't see NATO doing this with tanks, like before. It will do
  52. this with missile defense and military projects (F16s-see below).
  53. Planting NATO's flag on CE soil. So that Russia cannot do that
  54. instead.
  55.  
  56.  
  57.  
  58. Yes, NATO has lost its focus with the wars, but BMD and such can unite
  59. and refocus NATO once again.
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. BMD
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. CzR wants a role in missile defense. This cannot be stressed enough.
  68. The announcement under Obama to give bmd to others obliterated the
  69. Czech-US relationship-it is non-existent now.
  70.  
  71.  
  72.  
  73. Now this may seem contrary to what has been in the media, but everyone
  74. has it wrong on what actually happened in the Czech-US bmd
  75. negotiations under Bush. To start with, no one is/was straightforward
  76. in the negotiations. Yes, it is understandable that the US keeps their
  77. plans secret, but not when you are suppose to have a partner in the
  78. negotiations.
  79.  
  80.  
  81.  
  82. So here is how it played out: Bush's team came to CzR and proposed for
  83. the country to be part of the "bmd system". That was all they said.
  84. Some officials alluded that it would be the radar. In the Czech
  85. government, there was agreement that bmd was imperative. But every
  86. piece of formal documentation from the US was incredibly vague and
  87. didn't spell out what would actually be coming into CzR as part of the
  88. system. It was very strange and confusing. We had never done
  89. negotiations like this. So, we put off signing any document until we
  90. could know what exactly we were agreeing to. Why would we agree to be
  91. part of the bmd system, and not know what exactly that meant? Then
  92. they came to us and said that CzR would have to pay for its part of
  93. the system. We didn't have that sort of money at the time. It was a
  94. mess.
  95.  
  96.  
  97.  
  98. Then the new plan came from Obama in 2009. Obama's plan didn't have
  99. the radar in Czech Republic anymore. Obama's team said that Czech
  100. Republic wasn't a "priority" for their administration and that other
  101. countries were more important to put the radar in-Romania, Turkey,
  102. Lithuania or others. Problem is that Romania says they have the deal,
  103. but they haven't had confirmation from the US on this. Turkey also
  104. thinks it has the deal, but it doesn't have confirmation either. No
  105. one knows who is getting the radar portion of the system. Everyone
  106. wants it. The Obama team then came to CzR and offered a "piece" of the
  107. bmd system. We were excited. But when we got the the formal proposal,
  108. it was for a "bmd scientific research center". This was simply
  109. unacceptable. This was not good enough for us. CzR needs US military
  110. on its soil, not a "research" center with no military and would have
  111. to be paid for by the Czechs anyway. Completely ridiculous. So we
  112. pulled out of any agreement to the current system.
  113.  
  114.  
  115.  
  116. If the US came and said that radar would be put in CzR, we would agree
  117. immediately. But instead the US doesn't value CzR relationship at all.
  118.  
  119.  
  120.  
  121. When CzR publicly pulled out of the current bmd system in June,
  122. Russian FM immediately called Czech FM and said that it appreciated
  123. the reconsideration. Czech FM said that it had nothing to do with
  124. Russia. That Russia hadn't intimidated it to change its stance,
  125. instead CzR was more fired up to "retaliate" against Russian
  126. aggression.
  127.  
  128.  
  129.  
  130. As far as the current talks between the US and Russia on bmd, most of
  131. the CEs want to sabotage them. No one wants Russia in on bmd.
  132. Moreover, no one wants the US and Russia to be friendly. The US needs
  133. to quit with this reset-nonsense and move forward with a firm military
  134. strategy in CE. The CEs want to move against Russia, but can't do it
  135. alone.
  136.  
  137.  
  138.  
  139. New CE Security Plan
  140.  
  141.  
  142.  
  143. So if CzR can't get in the bmd system, there is another deal we will
  144. push for, as we are determined to get US military on our soil.
  145.  
  146.  
  147.  
  148. CzR wants a batch of F-16s like Poland. It needs supersonic. It
  149. doesn't really want the new Grippen. CzR is begging the US right now
  150. for F-16s. The US said it would sell them, but at an exorbitant price.
  151. They are far too expensive for CzR who has had to slash some of their
  152. defense budget because of the financial crisis.
  153.  
  154.  
  155.  
  156. Also, other countries who sell military equipment to CzR and the CEs
  157. do it within other deals, so it isn't just an expensive military deal.
  158. For example, the French sell things to CzR, but then purchase
  159. agricultural equipment from CzR in trade-all part of one deal (LG: I
  160. pointed out how the Russians do this all the time. Military trade for
  161. gold deals, etc). This creates a relationship more than just around
  162. one sector. The US hasn't done this.
  163.  
  164.  
  165.  
  166. So the plan that CzR is now presenting is for 5 or 6 Central European
  167. countries to go in together and do a mass order of the F-16s in
  168. exchange for a discount by the US. It would be Romania, Slovakia,
  169. Hungary, Bulgaria and maybe more for Poland - for 85 or so F-16s. It
  170. would be interesting because then all of them could train together in
  171. one country and then set up a repair factory in another country. The
  172. countries would be tied together - and tied to the US. The US would
  173. need to have military on the ground to train the CEs. This is the best
  174. sort of security alliance between US and CEs.
  175.  
  176.  
  177.  
  178. If CzR can't get bmd or the F16 deal, then it is done with any
  179. non-Eurasian commitments to NATO. Period. If CzR can get bmd or the
  180. F16s, then it will pretty much agree to any sort of military
  181. commitment the US wants anywhere in the world. That is the ultimatum.
  182.  
  183.  
  184.  
  185. Germans
  186.  
  187.  
  188.  
  189. CzR is really on a different page on most issues than Germany. But is
  190. on the same page as pretty much everything with the Poles. So the
  191. Poles and other Central Europeans are its true partners. The Germans
  192. are like toddlers in their defense strategy. They have been divided
  193. for so long, that they do not understand how to act inside of NATO.
  194. This is why they are nice to the Russians. It is the wrong strategy
  195. with them. The Germans think they can handle the Russians. They can't.
  196. Germany can't get the other NATO members to agree with it, so it only
  197. works bilaterally with the Russians, undermining NATO's focus.
  198.  
  199.  
  200.  
  201. Other Alliances
  202.  
  203.  
  204.  
  205. Nordic Alliance is a fascinating thing, but there is no plan for V4
  206. yet. Sure it'll have a battlegroup, but it'll be under the EU and not
  207. really going to flesh out without some "outside" help. V4 is
  208. overestimated in the US. There is no structure or command plan for it.
  209. It has been a painful process under the EU.
  210.  
  211.  
  212.  
  213. Ukraine
  214.  
  215.  
  216.  
  217. CzR is worried about Ukraine. It is so pro-Russian that there is a
  218. concern that it will militarize under the Moscow umbrella. Everyone in
  219. CE is concerned about this militarization.
  220.  
  221.  
  222.  
  223. McFaul
  224.  
  225.  
  226.  
  227. On McFaul: everyone in CE hates dealing with him. He is deluded. He
  228. believes that Russia can actually be pulled into being an ally with
  229. the US. McFaul wants to use Regan's gameplan. He constantly quotes
  230. Regan. On a sidenote, in McFaul's office there is a large (really
  231. large, like4x3) photo blown up above his desk of McFaul, Obama,
  232. Medvedev and Putin all sitting around the lunchtable smiling. However,
  233. the way I heard it was that McFaul was scared to death of Putin and
  234. stuttered the entire time.
  235.  
  236. --
  237. Lauren Goodrich
  238. Senior Eurasia Analyst
  239. STRATFOR
  240. T: 512.744.4311
  241. F: 512.744.4334
  242. www.stratfor.com
  243.  
  244. --
  245. Lauren Goodrich
  246. Senior Eurasia Analyst
  247. STRATFOR
  248. T: 512.744.4311
  249. F: 512.744.4334
  250. www.stratfor.com
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment