[1:29 PM] Tyler Williams: covered or saturated with water or another liquid.
[1:29 PM] Tyler Williams: fish are very wet
[1:32 PM] Justin Liang: yea
[1:32 PM] Justin Liang: no
[1:33 PM] Justin Liang: ok
[1:33 PM] Tyler Williams: do fish form air barriers around themselves?
[1:33 PM] Justin Liang: ok
[1:33 PM] Justin Liang: holdon
[1:33 PM] Devon Winrick: like a tactical barrier?
[1:33 PM] Justin Liang: let's define wetness as a function f(w) where f(w) represents the percentange of a object's wetness
[1:34 PM] Justin Liang: you are saying
[1:34 PM] Justin Liang: 0 < f(w) <= 100 means taht the object is wet
[1:34 PM] Justin Liang: that's saying a fish is wet
[1:34 PM] Justin Liang: the guy in the video
[1:34 PM] Justin Liang: is saying 0 < f(w) < 100
[1:34 PM] Justin Liang: meaning that a fish si not wet
[1:34 PM] Justin Liang: and onyl wet if it's exposed to other elements that's not water
[1:34 PM] Devon Winrick: both equations represent a level of wetness right?
[1:35 PM] Justin Liang: look at my inequalities
[1:35 PM] Justin Liang: yes
[1:35 PM] Justin Liang: both f(w) is the same
[1:35 PM] Bowen Dang: second this
[1:35 PM] Justin Liang: 0 < f(w) <= 100 == fish is wet because the fish's wetness == 100
[1:35 PM] Justin Liang: 0 < f(w) < 100 != fish is wet because the fish's wetness == 100
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: which 1 do u agree with
[1:36 PM] Devon Winrick: can fish wetness become 100?
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: yes
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: fish's wetness is 100
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: at it's null state
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: which is in the water
[1:36 PM] Tyler Williams: So the answer is nothing can be wet underwater
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: that is the first argument
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: no i'm asking u
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: if an object's f(w) == 100, is it wet?
[1:36 PM] Tyler Williams: yea
[1:36 PM] Justin Liang: or does f(w) < 100 means it's wet
[1:37 PM] Devon Winrick: if it's above 0 it's wet right?
[1:37 PM] Justin Liang: yes we already established that
[1:37 PM] Justin Liang: anything above 0 is wet
[1:37 PM] Justin Liang: we are arguing at the upper limit of wetness
[1:37 PM] Devon Winrick: you are wet right now ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
[1:37 PM] Justin Liang: whether wetness is defined as f(w) < 100 or f(w) <= 100
[1:38 PM] Bowen Dang: 0 < f(w) < 100, the definition of 'wet' is valid only when out of water IMO
[1:38 PM] Justin Liang: yea
[1:38 PM] Justin Liang: ok bowen so u are saying a fish is NOT wet?
[1:38 PM] Justin Liang: when it's in water
[1:38 PM] Bowen Dang: I kind of think it might be a trap but yes