API tools faq
paste
lyfsy

Expired domain that was spammy for last three years

lyfsy
Feb 19th, 2020
309
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.50 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Expired domain that was spammy for last three years
  2. I found out a domain that has a good profile backlink for its original website, but since 2017 it was a spammy shop untill now. Still, it shows a good and sane backlink profile on ahrefs, and also the original niche (previous to the spammy website) fills nicely for my MS. It's sitting at 10 TF / 19 CF / 28 DA and was first seen at 2010, not spammy untill 2017.
  3. ++++++++++++++
  4. list of top cheapest host http://Listfreetop.pw
  5.  
  6. Top 200 best traffic exchange sites http://Listfreetop.pw
  7.  
  8. free link exchange sites list http://Listfreetop.pw
  9. list of top ptc sites
  10. list of top ptp sites
  11. Listfreetop.pw
  12. Listfreetop.pw
  13. +++++++++++++++
  14. Do you think its worth the try for a PBN? I might revive it with some good content and not link it to MS untill some months have passed.
  15. Forget it and find something clean and usable. Cutting corners right at the first step never ends up well.
  16. See if the domain has been penalized.
  17.  
  18. May possibly still be a usable domain. :)
  19.  
  20. Today’s online advertising market is highly efficient. It means that usually, the cost of advertising reflects its value. Real bargains are rare and quickly disappear.
  21.  
  22. Today’s marketers face the classic “margin or volume” dilemma. The advertisers with low budgets and low volume expectations can start from the cheapest placements and low frequency.
  23.  
  24. Increasing volume requires buying more and more expensive placements, higher frequency, and higher ad position in search engine ads.
  25.  
  26. For this reason, the efficiency (ROI) of the ad decreases as the volume grows.
  27.  
  28. The general rule is that big players don’t buy cheaper, but it’s actually the opposite.
  29.  
  30.  
  31. Is Google Reviewing Guest Articles and UGC?
  32.  
  33. This change to the author guidelines relates to news magazines but also any site that accepts guest articles or user generated question and answers.
  34.  
  35. Does this mean that Google is reviewing guest posts and authors?
  36.  
  37. Gary Illyes recently called out Quora and their SEO team via Twitter.
  38.  
  39. Screenshot of a tweet by Google's Webmaster Analyst, Gary IllyesGary Illyes tweeted:
  40. “Anyone from the Quora SEO team? We need to talk.”
  41. Quora is a site that publishes user generated content. Some speculated it had to do with user generated spam links.
  42.  
  43. Screenshot of a tweet by Chistoph Cember, founder of Link Research ToolsChristoph Cemper, founder of Link Research Tools tweeted: “You mean because of all those FOLLOW links to spam?”
  44. Others tweeted that it may have to do with thin content.
  45.  
  46. We don’t know for certain but it’s interesting that the latest version of the QRG has a new section that addresses the authors of user generated content. This could be indicative that Google may be focusing on identifying low quality sites and excluding them.
  47.  
  48. Section 5.1 Very High Quality Main Content
  49.  
  50. This section has been expanded. The new content again addresses the uniqueness and originality. Again, it has a new focus on News sites, but it’s not limited to news sites. The standards of high excellence applies to all sites but in particular to YMYL sites.
  51.  
  52. Interestingly the new section goes beyond the quality of the text content. It also encourages the quality raters to judge the quality and originality of the artistic content, such as images, photography and videos.
  53.  
  54. I have long been encouraging site audit clients to review their images so that they not only download quickly but also that they express something about the content, that the images are relevant and original.
  55.  
  56. Here is the new content:
  57.  
  58. “A factor that often distinguishes very high quality MC is the creation of unique and original content for the specific website.
  59. While what constitutes original content may be very different depending on the type of website, here are some examples:
  60.  
  61. ● For news: very high quality MC is original reporting that provides information that would not otherwise have been known had the article not revealed it. Original, in-depth, and investigative reporting requires a high degree of skill, time, and effort. Often very high quality
  62.  
  63. news content will include a description of primary sources and other original reporting referenced during the content creation process. Very high quality news content must be accurate
  64. and should meet professional journalistic standards.
  65.  
  66. ● For artistic content (videos, images, photography, writing, etc.): very high quality MC is unique and original content created by highly skilled and talented artists or content creators. Such artistic content requires a high degree of skill/talent, time, and effort. If the artistic
  67.  
  68. content is related to a YMYL topic (e.g., artistic content with the purpose of informing or swaying opinion about YMYL topics), YMYL standards should apply.
  69.  
  70. ● For informational content: very high quality MC is original, accurate, comprehensive, clearly communicated, professionally presented, and should reflect expert consensus as appropriate. Expectations for different types of information may vary. For example, scientific
  71.  
  72. papers have a different set of standards than information about a hobby such as stamp collecting. However, all types of very high quality informational content share common attributes of accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clear communication, in addition to meeting
  73.  
  74. standards appropriate to the topic or field.”
  75.  
  76. Section 5.2.3 Very Positive Reputation
  77.  
  78. This section also received an update. This part is about reputation.
  79.  
  80. This is the new content:
  81.  
  82. “For YMYL topics especially, careful checks for reputation are required. YMYL reputation should be based on evidence from experts, professional societies, awards, etc. For shopping pages, experts could include people who have used the store’s website to make
  83.  
  84. purchases; whereas for medical advice pages, experts should be people or organizations with appropriate medical expertise or accreditation. Please review section 2.3 for a summary of types of YMYL pages/topics.”
  85.  
  86. Website reputation has long been a part of the Quality Raters Guidelines. I don’t think this means you should go out and join associations and seek testimonials.
  87.  
  88. But, publishers creating YMYL information should ideally be expert and have a good reputation. So this is one of those take due notice thereof and govern yourself accordingly type of situations.
  89.  
  90. Is Google researching reputation? I’ll have more on that in a future article.
  91.  
  92. tmearn.com
  93. make money 3d modeling
  94. 4sellers2buyers.com
  95. host indonesian business forum
  96. how can j make money
  97. 3 domains and kingdoms
  98. www.paytoclick.in
  99. sun7-barre.com
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!