API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

12 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-04-12 0155 +Leonard French

Lesta
Apr 11th, 2017
77
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 8.86 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2017-04-12 0155 +Leonard French
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOMl21K4WH0&lc=z12wyxa5jvvfezol222btpawetqovbbhd04
  3. https://pastebin.com/RGWF6z0G
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Leonard French __ *Good presentation.* I have two quick points to make and hope you get to read them. *SUMMARY:* A) This is a police state and the population needs to be trained to obey police. B) There is the potential for this incident to be fake and I will point out how the incident can be reasonably doubted. *NOTE:* My original comment got instantly hidden/blocked by Google/YouTube (unless I included a moderated word) and so for the full comment which expands on both points you will need to read about it here: https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/GHaH8zq9irY
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11. __________
  12.  
  13.  
  14. +Jeremy-Richardson __ You are so dumb. Obviously my lengthy comment contained a moderated keyword or was marked as spam *but has since been approved given that it's now visible.* Check the original link I gave with the g+ post which you used to find this thread. Are you going to apologise for your stupid reply? Unlikely - because you're dishonest. So I take it you're just going to follow me around like a negatively obsessed psychotic loser making dumb comments like you did above? LOL. *Go away you pest.*
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18. __________
  19.  
  20.  
  21. +Robbo Max __ ::sigh:: EVERYONE knows that it is a *cheap party-member tactic* to accuse another of the very things that you yourself are most guilty of. You ("Robbo Max") relentlessly tell everyone that I am a "liar" who "spreads disinformation" *but you cannot actually give an example of it*. Not without having to post some twisted 50-page porch dog essay that relies on misrepresentation and reader inattention.
  22.  
  23. I have for more than a week been trying to get a clear and simple explanation from you about a simple question that no honest person should be afraid of answering. However - the only answers you can produce are anything but clear and simple. You resort to 50-page porch dog essays instead of answering my simple question with a simple sentence or paragraph.
  24.  
  25. To those who aren't familiar with the question I am asking here it is: *In the analysis video that "smoke'n mirrors" did on the "Christine Nixon" interview with "3AW" why did he omit the line "hit by the cars"?*
  26.  
  27. We know that "smoke'n mirrors" chose to focus on other details such as the pronoun "we" as being an "indication of lying" but yet he made no reference at all to the line "hit by the cars". *Even though "hit by the cars" contradicts the official story of a single car being responsible for the carnage.*
  28.  
  29. After more than a week the most I have been able to ascertain from deciphering the 50-page ranting replies from "Robbo Max" is that the line "hit by the cars" was omitted because it's just 3 seconds from a 3.5 minute video *and for that reason insignificant.* Well - the pronoun "we" in the line "then we heard shots" requires _even less time_ to speak than "hit by the cars"!
  30.  
  31. You're not fooling anyone with your bullsh!t, "Robbo Max". Those who want to know more about this issue can watch my YouTube video on it here: watch?v=nrTyjZ4PXXo and take a squiz at my Google Plus post here (read through the comments): https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/AYqecGWxTv6
  32.  
  33. *Any further replies from others on this thread that do not specifically relate to my opening comment will be ignored.* These desperate people have resorted to following me about all over YouTube and Google Plus to spread their bullsh!t in an effort to subvert the pursuit of truth.
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40. __________
  41.  
  42. *ATTENTION ALL.* The above is a typical example of a lengthy porch dog essay that "Robbo Max" writes everywhere I go on YouTube. He continues to post his garbage on threads that have nothing to do with the original comment (e.g., it has nothing to do with my original comment). At all times "Robbo Max" relies on misrepresentation and reader inattention to make his point.
  43.  
  44. Since it would require a response even longer than the one he wrote I must confine myself to scrutinising just one of the silly statements from "Robbo Max". He wrote:
  45.  
  46. _"The GIGANTIC problem with Let's hypothesis is that in the interview when asked if she saw anyone hit by a car she says NO! *Therefore what she says about cars hitting people is completely irrelevant* because it is not her evidence (as she did not see anyone hit)"_ [emphasis mine]
  47.  
  48. *THREE QUICK POINTS:*
  49.  
  50. 1) The person who wrote the porch dog essay asserts that "Christine Nixon" is a liar who lied throughout her radio interviews. If he considers her to be a liar *then why does he choose to believe her when she said she didn't see anyone get hit by a car?* How is he choosing which statements to believe and which to reject?
  51.  
  52. 2) A police officer might lie about not having seen anyone get hit by a car if that officer had seen pursuing police hit or clip pedestrians. We cannot expect the police to always tattle on each other when they are united in doing a job.
  53.  
  54. 3) Even if "Christine Nixon" did not see anyone get hit by a car it is possible for her to have known multiple cars were involved. For example - if you saw people knocked down on a footpath as well as on a road (in parallel to the injured on the footpath) - and you could see police pursuing on the road at high speed - then you can know more than one car must have been involved even though you did not see anyone get struck.
  55.  
  56. It should be repeated that the entire porch dog response by "Robbo Max" is an effort to avoid the following simple question: *Why was the line "hit by the cars" omitted from the analysis video "smoke'n mirrors" posted?*
  57.  
  58. He has no simple explanation. He is forced to resort to writing about anything and everything but that. He is forced to follow me around YouTube calling me a "liar" who "spreads disinformation" because he cannot give an explanation that doesn't sound like bullsh!t.
  59.  
  60. From what I can gather (after more than a week of being subjected to his porch dog essays) the main reason for avoiding the question is because "hit by the cars" required just 3 seconds out of a 3.5 minute interview and therefore isn't considered significant or important.
  61.  
  62. Once you have picked yourself up off the ground from laughing at that naivety it should be obvious that it's like saying: "We should ignore the criminal's admission of guilt during his police interview because that was just 3 seconds out of a 3.5 hour interrogation!"
  63.  
  64. It is absurd. "Robbo Max" is forced to follow me around expressing absurdities.
  65.  
  66. Good, honest and intelligent people are able to give clear and simple explanations to relevant questions. When someone is forced to write a 50-page porch dog essays in an effort to avoid giving a clear and simple explanation we must wonder whether it's because the truth is embarrassing.
  67.  
  68. I wish I could remove replies to this thread that do not relate to the original comment because it distracts from the "United Airlines incident". Alas - I cannot. Therefore I apologise to those having to suffer through the stupid replies above mine.
  69.  
  70. Just wait and see - it can be expected that another lengthy porch dog essay will follow on from this reply.
  71.  
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77. __________
  78.  
  79. +Robbo Max __ Another porch dog essay. *Why do you believe "Christine Nixon" is telling the truth when she said she did not see anyone get hit by a car?*
  80.  
  81. Can you provide a clear answer by way of a simple sentence or paragraph that doesn't waste everyone's time with another 50 pages of "I won't answer your question except to repeat that Lesta is a liar who spreads disinformation"?
  82.  
  83. Explain why you believe "Christine Nixon" when she said she didn't see anyone get hit by a car or shut the f_kc up you dopey d!ckhead!
  84.  
  85.  
  86. *EDIT:* LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So you believe her because she said "no" in a way that convinced you?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAH But you don't believe her when she TWICE said "hit by the cars"?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH
  87.  
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91. ______________________________________________________________
  92. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  93.  
  94. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  95. https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
  96.  
  97. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  98. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  99.  
  100. Lesta Nediam's Official Blog:
  101. https://lestanediam DOT blogspot DOT com
  102. [Reconstruct the URL as I am unable to post it!]
  103.  
  104. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  105. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  106.  
  107. Lesta Nediam's Minds
  108. https://www.minds.com/LestaNediam
  109.  
  110. Lesta Nediam's Vimeo
  111. https://vimeo.com/lestanediam
  112.  
  113. Lesta Nediam's Vidme
  114. https://vid.me/LestaNediam
  115.  
  116. Lesta Nediam's Dailymotion
  117. https://www.dailymotion.com/LestaNediam
  118.  
  119. Lesta Nediam's LiveLeak
  120. https://www.liveleak.com/c/LestaNediam
  121.  
  122. Lesta Nediam's Disqus:
  123. https://disqus DOT com/home/forum/lestanediam/
  124. [Reconstruct the URL as I am unable to post it!]
  125.  
  126. Lesta Nediam's Archived Public Comments:
  127. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  128.  
  129.  
  130. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  131. What exists - exists to always exist.
  132. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!