10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-10 0305 +cabadejo

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-02-10 0305 +cabadejo
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/8KPes6B5JXp
https://pastebin.com/RE1BPk5e
__


+cabadejo __ [Oops I wrote a lot again.] Don't take it too literally! Of course there are words that exist and can be used to describe dreams and dreaming.

We could even use words associated with alcohol to describe dreaming! But we don't do that. That is my point. We simply do not describe our dreams with a rich and consistent vocabulary.

If someone says they had a "nightmare" it doesn't immediately tell us much other than "they had a bad experience while asleep".

They might then elaborate and say "I got chased in my dream". But we don't have a specific word for "getting chased in a dream"! That is my point.

Whereas we might have a single word (or two word combination) to describe some detail about a wine as it nestles on our taste buds.

Furthermore - if we start using words in a specific way to describe dreams then it will have meaning to us only. *If you go somewhere else and use the same terms - **_those people won't know what you mean._*

(They will have to learn your terminology. This loosely - _though not quite_ - relates to "Lesta's island analogy".)

Just as "Lesta's lie system lexicon" has meaning to you and Terran - *it can have no so much meaning to other people.*

For example: "belief control", "shadow belief", "sufficient proof", "event priming" (and dozens of other words/terms) all now have actual meaning and relevance to both you and Terran.

*But to someone unfamiliar with Lesta [and now you and Terran] they don't.*

(One way to attack me is to corrupt those terms I am using *before* other people hear about them from me. By the time people stumble upon me those words and terms will have been "cheapened" by other people - although anticipated [it's inevitable] it is happening sooner than expected.)

As I pointed out in a recent video (the one about "Lesta's lie system lexicon") *the first task in solving a substantial problem is to create a specialised vocabulary for it.*

And that is what I have been doing with the "lie system" (which in itself is a term created to make the process of solving "whatever the problem is" easier) *and the same can be done for dreams and dreaming.*

Prior to any "lie system terminology" all we had was worthless, devalued, corrupted, polluted lie system equivalents! Like our vocabulary for "dreams" we have been *given* those words/terms and they have served to keep us *blind.*

Since forming my own terminology I am now able to think about the problem in a more precise way and dealing with "lie system representatives" is now much easier. That wasn't the case a year ago.

And so to bring that back to the lacking of "dream" terminology.

We have the word "nightmare" (as we have the term "wet dream"!) and we have a few other words but really that's it. *It's minimal.* For something we all do - for our entire life - our vocabulary dealing with it is minimal and we have few specialised words. To me that is intentional. *That is how you HIDE something.*

(Remember: people will say "the one who can't be named" or they will refer to me by using a certain other person's name who has 3 letter initials which I won't name.)

Do you know what the word for a dream where you are running late to something is? Neither do I! There is likely no specific word for it! We have to call it - _perhaps_ - an "anxiety dream" *and then qualify what we mean.*

When we lack a word or term - it means we have to qualify/elaborate/explain what we are saying.

When I say "shadow belief" - it can now be understood to mean a "belief that has been founded and formed on trust and mistaking proof's appearances for proof".

But a year or two ago - (before I was here) - if I had asked: _"What is the word for a belief someone holds that could be false?"_ you might have to call it an *"opinion"* or a *"bias"* or something like that. But those terms aren't precise and they overlap with other things. They are "make do" words to "fit".

We can say "I had a nightmare" but then have to explain what happened - such as being chased. There's no specific word for "a nightmare where you got chased" that is widely recognised.

__

In my life - obviously - I have experienced many dreams and a broad range of experiences within them. And when writing them down I have always had to use many words to describe what should require fewer words (by using "one or two word terms").

(Because I try to be efficient with what I do I tend to invent my own terms for things but those terms are only be meaningful to me.)

There are dozens - if not hundreds - of nuances and states within dreams that could but don't have a "one or two word term".

For example - there should exist a term for the experience of, _"Suspecting you are dreaming while dreaming but not successfully being able to figure it out"._

Such as you may suspect you could be dreaming and so to check [a "reality check"] you "jump up in the air" but because you do not float you conclude you must not be dreaming (that kind of dream logic is like "Pretzel Logic"! [which is another term that has meaning to you and Terran but not to anyone external!]).

There is no word for THAT state/experience yet I have experienced it enough times to know that it should have one!

*And whatever term becomes chosen for such a phenomenon can only have meaning and relevance to me or you etc. unless it were popularised.*


__

(A quick aside: I have over the years trained myself so that if I am dreaming and *ever* find myself *questioning* or *wondering* whether or not I could be dreaming then the reflexive response is: *"yes, you MUST be dreaming!"* That I am dreaming is assumed and taken for granted. *Because you can only ever ponder this question without feeling immediate certainty about the answer while in a dream!*)

__


That is why I say we are *given* only a *"token"* vocabulary because there does not exist a "popular set of terms".

Wine uses familiar words - including non-alcohol terms - *with a wine context.* And people who learn that "wine terminology" (just as you went to a class) will know what is meant. The meaning is *shared* between those who have been exposed to the terminology.

I am simply saying that this "dream nomenclature" *is absent when it comes to dreams and dreaming.* Yes - we COULD invent terms (and in time I will) but we don't HAVE any that have been given to us. Not properly. If we have really been around for "thousands of years" *then isn't it a little strange that for something as pervasive and common as "dreaming" we have not been given such a thing.* _But when it comes to wine tasting - not a problem!_

__

Here is where it's all leading. *We have been GIVEN religions (and the rejection of religion - "Atheism").* We are even given an ability to CHOOSE a religion (we are at risk of being most controlled when it feels like a free choice!). Typically we are born INTO a religion but as we get older we may REJECT that religion we were born into and either abandon ALL religions or CHOOSE from the "available choices". *This is all by design!*

And to keep people confined to those choices not only is much time wasted but an *ALTERNATIVE is HIDDEN from us!* And that has to do with "dreaming". And that is why "dreams and dreaming" in a philosophical sense (or "religious sense") *is corrupted and polluted and filled with disinformation and nonsense.*

Just as "predictive programming" offers us *no predictive power* whatsoever. The "alternatives to religion" that incorporate "dreaming" are (effectively) a kind of *CONTROLLED OPPOSITION for ATHEISM and RELIGION.*

__

Dreaming provides us with a *rich ANALOGY* to the REALITY of our conscious experience of "life" and "death" and of CREATION and *everything else in-between.*

It is HIDDEN from us while at all times it remains in front of us. A kind of domestic blindness! *The universe looks after us all - but we have to reject the lie system in order to even NOTICE the universe.*

For what it's worth: my ideas and beliefs with regard to *"the universe functions like a dream"* predate by well over a decade the "lie system". I spent many years thinking about and observing the "universe functioning like a dream" long before I realised there was a "lie system". In a way - the existence of the lie system answered one of my questions: *"How can it be there aren't already any 'dream based' religions?!"* (It puzzled me but now makes perfect sense.)

After all - if [allegedly] billions of people can take seriously "religious ideas" then why aren't there any people who have organised themselves into a religion based on "dreams and dreaming?" (Using the "dream" state as an analogy etc.) It hasn't really happened except in some "fringe" ways that has had the consequence of corrupting, cheapening and guarding against the analogy.

It makes sense that the lie system wants to keep THOSE thoughts and ideas away from people - because if enough people begin to realise that the universe functions like a dream *they will begin rejecting lies and liars and story tellers and probably outright revolt.*

(Belief is responsible for what "thoughts, ideas, urges, etc." arise within us - personality is what chooses from amongst our possibilities. The lie system needs to keep us away from thinking about "the universe functions like a dream" and so it associates "dreams" and "dreaming" with silly things. Just as "Jeff C" attempts to associate the lie system and sufficient proof with silly things like "blue whales are a psyop".)



__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w