API tools faq
paste
Lesta

10 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-30 0230 +Brian Hill

Lesta
Jul 29th, 2016
79
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.64 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-30 0230 +Brian Hill
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTJmm3vypsY&lc=z130wvjjrwykxpuqh04ccjgxsr3cdn1xfgk
  3. https://pastebin.com/QZ2LuLEP
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Brian Hill __ This is quickly typed! Remember - the lie system does not make [fatal] mistakes. _That is an axiom._ It means you are only wasting your time if you attempt to scrutinise a piece of "ISS" footage so as to point and say *THAT* is where the edit was done! Because even if you are right - _you have *no way to prove it*!_
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13. All we can know is that each glitch - _however great or small_ - can serve as a potential editing point (either a "conditioning glitch" if it's not an outright "editing glitch" as NPS put it). Such crippled footage can no longer qualify as "sufficient proof" (*even if that's what it would be without the glitches!*). As soon as something isn't sufficient proof you are using your imagination to fill in the blanks.
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20. To the logical extreme it would be like drawing a ball on a piece of paper and saying "that's the Earth from space". The Earth may well be a ball like you have drawn but the instant you accept the drawing then your imagination had to fill in the blanks. If you have only seen the appearances of proof and not [actual] proof - but believe it - then it is only because you have convinced yourself (and not because you *saw* something to justify the belief).
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27. Such unjustified beliefs (shadow beliefs) are common enough but none of us have a right to believe them as certainties (though they may well be true!) and we must not repeat them to others as a fact about reality! (We are being tempted in a thousand different ways every day to believe in this false way!)
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34. You have to stop looking at events and claims thinking you can somehow EXPOSE them as fake (or real). However - we are encouraged to do that because it traps us into the dichotomy of "event skeptics" ("hoaxtards") and "event realists" ("realtards"). That works out nicely for "them".
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41. If an event or claim *could* be exposed as fabricated (i.e., a "fatal mistake" could be discovered and presented) then it would either NOT BE a lie system event/claim (and just the work of activists or pranksters) *OR* the lie system *would not in the first place have lied about it*. When it comes to truths we can figure out for ourselves (i.e., "self-evident truths") the lie system does not outright lie about them - but instead (where possible) *distorts and offers only half-truths*.
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47.  
  48. As much as possible the lie system lies. And as much as possible it lies about its lies! Giving half-truths is like when a news article gives conflicting information about an event. Just so long as *one* of the details is (ultimately) "correct" then the lie system has not *outright lied*! It only outright lies if *it can never be for you a self-evident truth*.
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. Doing things in this manner (which is why it is a *system*) results in the population becoming dependent *wholly on trust*. Trust is at the core of it all. (And if you don't trust the nightly news - then that's okay - just so long as you trust in "Alex Jones" or "David Icke"!)
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. I should remind you: *it may well be that the "ISS" is real and manned*! It is just that from where we sit in the audience - *we cannot know*. (It cannot be a self-evident truth for us unless we get to see qualifying sufficient proof.) All we can observe is that after more than 15 years "NASA" and their billions still have never been able to provide for us a stable "live stream" from the "ISS" *that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans* (i.e., potential editing points)!
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69. That's both incredible and amazing! _As amazing and as incredible as the idea itself that it could all be fake!_
  70.  
  71.  
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76. Anyone who *believes* the "ISS" is real and manned has formed an *unjustified belief*. They never saw sufficient proof. Normally this is okay. Many of our day-to-day beliefs are "unjustified beliefs"! But this is wholly dangerous when such shadow beliefs arise out of the stories told by story tellers! (I.e., known and confirmed liars - and those who have proven they will lie "for the greater good" whenever it's needed.)
  77.  
  78.  
  79.  
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83. For a person to believe anything on the nightly news (anything lacking sufficient proof) means they have founded and formed their belief wholly on trust and accepting (or mistaking) proof's appearances for [actual] proof. This is what a "shadow belief" is. Such shadow beliefs have profound consequences on the population! It means that those who trust the story tellers *are rendered powerless to resist believing* whatever they are told. Should an alien invasion be reported on the nightly news tomorrow - though rejected today - *_will be magically embraced tomorrow!_*
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87.  
  88.  
  89.  
  90. All of the events and claims - _all of them_ - are just a way for the lie system to impose its voodoo on the population. To keep the process going. Each new generation needs to be trained! Each new generation needs to be trained so as to become more deeply receptive and suggestible to it. That's all. (Turn your attention away from it and it's gone!)
  91.  
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96.  
  97. The only reason the "ISS" is interesting is because it is one of the few things (perhaps the only thing) that can *prove* this is *really happening* (that sufficient proof is intentionally and systematically withheld - as though it were a policy). All because what we would have expected to see by now for the "ISS" (the sufficient proof) remains glaringly absent. As time passes the chances of this *not* being intentional *approaches zero!*
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101.  
  102.  
  103.  
  104. The only other publically known "claim" that is perhaps the equivalent (in many ways) of the alleged "ISS" proving the lie system is "Stephen Hawking". Those two claims - if you approach them properly - *will give you enough insights about the lie system to solve the rest for yourself*. (As I say - the eternal truth is already within you - it's a matter of figuring out how to remember it.)
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108.  
  109.  
  110.  
  111. I wrote a bit of a ramble that is related and may or may not be of interest to you here: https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/7pUkcNm5Tdw
  112.  
  113. ______________________________________________________________
  114. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  115.  
  116. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  117. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  118.  
  119. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  120. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  121.  
  122. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  123. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  124.  
  125. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  126. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  127.  
  128. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  129. What exists - exists to always exist.
  130. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!