Lesta

24 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-12-09 0355 +nationalparksign

Dec 8th, 2016
47
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.19 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-12-09 0355 +nationalparksign
  2. https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/Y3piX8757eJ
  3. https://pastebin.com/QHd7CrRA
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +nationalparksign __ Yes. Good post and observations. There are some "sneaky edits" that take place during an alleged interview with "Julian Assange" (especially - and most undeniably - with the tip of his left collar at ~18:47 watch between 18:40 and 18:50) here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sbT3_9dJY4
  7.  
  8. Scroll through the comments and look for those mentioning it has been edited. *Notice how the apologists are suddenly experts on the "morphing glitches" and dismiss them as nothing but "normal"*.
  9.  
  10. One person correctly pointed out that the presence of these glitches means the footage cannot qualify as "proof of life". This is correct but such an observation fuels the belief "Julian Assange" isn't alive (probably intentional).
  11.  
  12. These people really should go and take a look at the "ISS" videos and also realise that the glitches do not mean one thing or another - *only that we have to trust the people who are telling the story aren't also lying about or embellishing their story*.
  13.  
  14. Everything that's happening of late (since around the time of the "Donald Trump" win) seems to be an escalation from the lie system (for whatever reason that may be).
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18. __________
  19.  
  20.  
  21. +nationalparksign __ Follow-up. I am not sure about the other "glitches" people mention (I haven't looked at them too closely and some may be bullsh!t).
  22.  
  23. I'd like to rule out the collar glitch as being a result of the lighting etc. Whatever it is - it certainly looks odd and can create doubt in the interview itself.
  24.  
  25. There is no need for such shenanigans as they could always have switched to the guy interviewing if they needed to perform an edit.
  26.  
  27. However - to retain the focus exclusively on "Julian Assange" seems more to send the message: "Yes he really did say this" or "we were able to edit the video to make him say these words" (that kind of thing).
  28.  
  29. I.e., by keeping him on screen it serves as a kind of "proof" he "really did" speak those words (when it remains possible he didn't).
  30.  
  31. Had the focus shifted to the interviewer then people would simply say the audio had been edited to say those words (since you'd need to see him speaking those words to "prove" he did speak them).
  32.  
  33. If you are ever speaking on camera - be sure to move about a lot to make such a "morphing glitch" impossible!
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40. __________
  41.  
  42.  
  43. +nationalparksign __ *Exactly*. How is this not an *escalation* from the lie system?
  44.  
  45. I would say this has been done to f_kc with the minds of (already paranoid) people such as "online truthers" (like what the "Pizza-Gate" bullsh!t has done).
  46.  
  47. If a person doesn't understand that the lie system intentionally and systematically cripples "sufficient proof" for its claims in order to create doubt (in the minds of intelligent people) and force trust (in all people) they will fall for the "fallacy of the conspiracy theorist" which people are already doing.
  48.  
  49. The fallacy of the conspiracy theorist in this instance: *_"If there are glitches present then it means the interview has been faked/concocted or was entirely CGI"_*.
  50.  
  51. Some people noted that "Julian Assange" looked a bit chubbier. In recent years there has been talk about "clones"/"doubles" and certain channels (e.g., "Russianvids") have in recent months planted (reinforced) the belief that "they" have the technology to put a digital face on another body and make it speak as though that person in "real time" etc.
  52.  
  53. All of these "seeds" have been planted in advance and are now coming to fruition (sown just long enough ago that the reason for them could not be known by the population - only guessed).
  54.  
  55. (If that is true about the "face overlay technology" and is actively being used then every "ISS" video becomes instantly doubtable and there is no way to provide "sufficient proof" of a manned "ISS" without the public literally being able to visit.)
  56.  
  57. If I were a "normal person" and noticed these things I would be inclined to think that these are all symptoms of a vast "propaganda network" activating so as to reach the population (with the necessary "propaganda") during a time of war.
  58.  
  59. Or it could be another "force" is seizing control and this is how they go about things (and we are simply noticing the "transition phase" because we are focused on these things).
  60.  
  61. China. Dream. Universe. It may not be a coincidence that the Chinese recently sent a "message" to the "ISS astronauts" from the alleged "Tiangong-2" (or whatever it is called).
  62.  
  63. (It may be the lie system has its origins in China and everywhere else in the world is getting "brought up to speed" etc. Though that's just a hunch!)
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68.  
  69. ______________________________________________________________
  70. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  71.  
  72. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  73. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  74.  
  75. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  76. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  77.  
  78. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  79. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  80.  
  81. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  82. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  83.  
  84. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  85. What exists - exists to always exist.
  86. As it is written - so it is done.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment