dataman9

Untitled

Jun 5th, 2017
106
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 10.73 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Randall Simun Could you, for the sake of us Ill informed readers, please supply a list of news organizations that you'd say are "real."
  2. Like · Reply · 3 · 3 hrs · Edited
  3. Remove
  4. Steve Alexander
  5. Steve Alexander Rare to find an outlet without bias, typically better to go straight to the horse's mouth. Listening to congressional testimonies for example. In this case we could look at the study they cite and see if it was peer-reviewed and what their polling methods were.
  6. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  7. Edit
  8. Randall Simun
  9. Randall Simun Did you do that?
  10. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  11. Remove
  12. Steve Alexander
  13. Steve Alexander Washington Post was a real left-leaning newspaper with obituaries and classifieds, but it was going out of business. Jeff Bezos bought the paper before he knew the price. He proceeded to hire Podesta and push out buzzfeed style articles while monopolizing on the prior papers brand identity.
  14. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  15. Edit
  16. Randall Simun
  17. Randall Simun I asked, before you shouted a blanket "fake news", did you do your own fact checking as you suggested the rest of us do above?
  18. Like · Reply · 2 · 2 hrs
  19. Remove
  20. Randall Simun
  21. Randall Simun Or did you bray "fake news" like an ass without doing the due diligence you think the rest of us should perform?
  22. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  23. Remove
  24. Steve Alexander
  25. Steve Alexander yes actually, washington post mis-characterizes the findings of the report they cite
  26. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  27. Edit
  28. Randall Simun
  29. Randall Simun How so? By the rubric of household income it stands up to scrutiny.
  30. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  31. Remove
  32. Steve Alexander
  33. Steve Alexander they talk about the general election then cite data from the primaries
  34. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  35. Edit
  36. Steve Alexander
  37. Steve Alexander and its not surprising that primary voters would be more affluent than your general election voters, the same is probably true of democrat primaries too
  38. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  39. Edit
  40. Randall Simun
  41. Randall Simun It's representative data of his electorate. You could also use that data based on how much of the primary vote that went for Republicans then went to Trump (as opposed to I guess Johnson). It's a logical conclusion to say that the financial standing of the electorate that voted republican in the primary would be the same in the general.
  42. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  43. Remove
  44. Steve Alexander
  45. Steve Alexander but its not what they said in their headline, and people like you and dean share this sort of thing without even looking twice
  46. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  47. Edit
  48. Randall Simun
  49. Randall Simun There may be a margin of error but the article supports a 66% vs 33% financial split.
  50. Like · Reply · 2 hrs · Edited
  51. Remove
  52. Randall Simun
  53. Randall Simun So really your reactionary shout of fake news isn't all that founded. Just the knee jerk reaction of the right.
  54. Like · Reply · 3 · 2 hrs
  55. Remove
  56. Steve Alexander
  57. Steve Alexander In the primary phase. Which is a mischaracterization. Then later on they cite an NBC user poll which would inherently be biased to democrats.
  58. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  59. Edit
  60. Randall Simun
  61. Randall Simun So because all sources contain "fake news" any news can be deemed fake when convenient?
  62. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  63. Remove
  64. Steve Alexander
  65. Steve Alexander yes, any editorial based on bad data can be thrown out immediately
  66. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  67. Edit
  68. Randall Simun
  69. Randall Simun You're using "bad data" in the same way you use "fake news." You don't agree with the findings so it's wrong.
  70. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  71. Remove
  72. Steve Alexander
  73. Steve Alexander no, the findings are biased and polling method is non scientific
  74. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  75. Edit
  76. Steve Alexander
  77. Steve Alexander on the contrary it looks like youre willing to believe bad data if it supports your viewpoint
  78. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  79. Edit
  80. Randall Simun
  81. Randall Simun How are they biased exactly?
  82. Like · Reply · 2 hrs · Edited
  83. Remove
  84. Randall Simun
  85. Randall Simun And no, I was quite willing to believe uneducated white working poor were to blame for Trump. This is surprising to me.
  86. Like · Reply · 2 · 2 hrs
  87. Remove
  88. Steve Alexander
  89. Steve Alexander You're wrong more often than you'd think :)
  90. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  91. Edit
  92. Randall Simun
  93. Randall Simun So then the article is correct in it's findings? Or were you just trying to take an easy dig without any real information about my stances?
  94. Like · Reply · 1 · 2 hrs
  95. Remove
  96. Steve Alexander
  97. Steve Alexander no, youre just wrong twice
  98. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  99. Edit
  100. Randall Simun
  101. Randall Simun And, even if the case can be made that in some labyrinth manner there may be some bias in polling (which there is in any poll) why not make that? Why not make the reasoned (if incorrect) assertion instead of pulling down your drawers and shitting "fake news" in the comments?
  102. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  103. Remove
  104. Steve Alexander
  105. Steve Alexander you can drink as much fakenews kool aid as you want, but most people care about authenticity and journalistic integrity
  106. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  107. Edit
  108. Randall Simun
  109. Randall Simun So you'll just keep rolling on by that with an insult instead of owning up to shouting fake news without making a point as to why.
  110.  
  111. Cool stuff man. I guess I'll just have to rely on reputable sources for my information while being able to draw logical conclusions and, you know, think things out. ...See More
  112. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  113. Remove
  114. Steve Alexander
  115. Steve Alexander public faith in the mainstream media is at an all-time low, youre in the minority
  116. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  117. Edit
  118. Randall Simun
  119. Randall Simun 71% of republican voters don't have a college education. I read that somewhere. I guess if you can't think critically it's easier to listen to an authoritarian figure then read the news.
  120. Like · Reply · 2 hrs · Edited
  121. Remove
  122. Randall Simun
  123. Randall Simun And being in the minority or majority has never been the litmus test for what is right.
  124. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  125. Remove
  126. Steve Alexander
  127. Steve Alexander I think you made that number up, cite your data. Ironic that you'd do that in the midst of a conversation about data integrity
  128. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  129. Edit
  130. Randall Simun
  131. Randall Simun It's from the article. You know. The ones we're talking about. That you read and are refuting.
  132. Like · Reply · 1 · 2 hrs
  133. Remove
  134. Steve Alexander
  135. Steve Alexander exactly, you played yourself
  136. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  137. Edit
  138. Randall Simun
  139. Randall Simun Exactly what? Son if you're going to make a definitive statement make sure you get around to the point. I assumed you read the article and took in the content. Maybe I'm wrong there. Next time I'll be sure to say "and this number is taken directly from the article we're talking about" just in case you missed a few key points.
  140. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  141. Remove
  142. Randall Simun
  143. Randall Simun This has been fun. Maybe do this next time. I've got no problem disagreeing with you. At least you're trying to make a point.
  144.  
  145. But that fake news shit is for children. Or the President. And I don't think you're either.
  146. Like · Reply · 2 hrs · Edited
  147. Remove
  148. Steve Alexander
  149. Steve Alexander I gave you direct examples of how the wapo editorial misrepresents data and then goes on to cite an NBC non-scientific poll without mentioning they've switched sources
  150. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  151. Edit
  152. Randall Simun
  153. Randall Simun Sure you did pal. After I said "why you gotta shout fake news like a toddler."
  154.  
  155. So open with your defense next time. ...See More
  156. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  157. Remove
  158. Steve Alexander
  159. Steve Alexander Saying im wrong doesnt make me wrong :) I proved that wapo showed poor journalistic integrity with their methods.
  160. Like · Reply · 2 hrs
  161. Edit
  162. Randall Simun
  163. Randall Simun I refuted that point by point boyo. You assumed blanket bias by NBC with no founding and applied it to one poll. And your primary/general assertion was simple to get around with pretty basic stat ruling and logic.
  164.  
  165. You're using your bias to find fault...See More
  166. Like · Reply · 3 · 2 hrs · Edited
  167. Remove
  168. Steve Alexander
  169. Steve Alexander Thanks for your opinion mate, still doesnt change that this article is fake, biased, and simply bad journalism.
  170. Like · Reply · 1 hr
  171. Edit
  172. Randall Simun
  173. Randall Simun I know man. I don't like it when I disagree with statistics either. It's rough.
  174. Like · Reply · 2 · 1 hr
  175. Remove
  176. Dean Beyma
  177. Dean Beyma Fake news dump.
  178.  
  179. https://fivethirtyeight.com/.../the-mythology-of-trumps.../...See More
  180.  
  181. The Mythology Of Trump’s ‘Working Class’ Support
  182. FIVETHIRTYEIGHT.COM|BY NATE SILVER
  183. Like · Reply · 1 · 1 hr
  184. Remove
  185. Steve Alexander
  186. Steve Alexander https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/fivethirtyeight/
  187.  
  188. FiveThirtyEight
  189. LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often…
  190. MEDIABIASFACTCHECK.COM
  191. Like · Reply · Remove Preview · 1 hr
  192. Edit
  193. Dean Beyma
  194. Dean Beyma Right, so fake news. Totally false. The exact opposite must be true instead. Sad. #MAGA
  195. Like · Reply · 2 · 1 hr
  196. Remove
  197. Steve Alexander
  198. Steve Alexander 👍
  199. Like · Reply · 1 hr
  200. Edit
  201. Tom Beyma
  202. Tom Beyma This should have ended when you suggested he do research you didn't do. Then it really should have ended before you stated that although you think Democrats don't do research or have credible sources... You don't do research or have credible sources. Y...See More
  203. Like · Reply · 1 hr
  204. Remove
  205. Steve Alexander
  206. Steve Alexander The burden of proof lies with the claimant Tom. Also, I never suggested that "democrats dont do research or have credible sources." Instead I claimed that the article at hand was fake news - which it is. I then showed why its fake news with examples and explanation. I then went on to explain the history of Washington Post and why its so clearly a trashy organization masquerading as a newspaper with integrity.
  207. Like · Reply · 1 hr
  208. Edit
  209. Tom Beyma
  210. Tom Beyma Dear god don't expect me to rationalize that.
  211.  
  212. I am smart enough to read an article and dissect bias. Don't expect me to not read the news....See More
  213. Like · Reply · 2 · 42 mins · Edited
  214. Remove
  215. Steve Alexander
  216. Steve Alexander Not surprised :P
  217. Like · Reply · 44 mins
  218. Edit
  219. Tom Beyma
  220. Tom Beyma You're basically making an argument that we should only get our news from the president. I don't want to rationalize that or see a reason to. It's not really an opposing viewpoint setting... That's fascism. If I have to keep following and filtering "the fake media" so I can get local and state news then I'm gonna fight that fight. You suggest I shouldn't follow mainstream media and should just listen to politicians.... What is this, 1984?
  221. Like · Reply · 33 mins · Edited
  222. Remove
  223. Steve Alexander
  224. Steve Alexander That's not at all what I said so I'll let your accusation fall on its own merit. If you want to talk about Fascism, I'd love to discuss that with you! You might be surprised to know that fascism is a product of left-wing politics!
  225. Like · Reply · 33 mins
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment