What was the stuff about Vee uploading and taking down a video? Because apparently he uploaded it again despite agreeing that something about it was deficient.

Skeptics like to talk publicly about how good they are, but then insist they have no responsibility later on. Something Vee dislikes when others do it.

Strangely, for someone who hates "moralfagging" he only ever has moralistic objections. Also, for all his claims of honesty and hatred of lying he's actually a pretty bad liar. In just this stream: lied about how open Sargon's event is (previously defended him boxing out altrighters), lied about AltHype wanting to 'ban video games', lied to host about a video he was about to post, and "there is no debate with the altright" (because he's a serial loser). He also repeatedly misunderstood Spencer's positions in the post-debate stream with Sargon, which amounted to spreading false info about him wanting to ban football among other things. Sargon did nothing to correct this, which is something Vee complains about other groups failing to do. And his senpai is running with the "Spencer is a Jew" narrative, which has even less proof than Weev being a Jew (his mom said his "family is multiracial and he has Jewish roots on both sides", said defensively when asked by people inquiring about her son)

Google "definition of doxing". The closest they come to Vee's definition is "typically with malicious intent". And includes personal and identifying info. Being autistic about what counts as identifying is pretty dumb with that in mind.

Issue with definitions involving intent (lucky for him) can never be proven, and thinks it is okay when there are allegations against someone or if the dox is easy to find. And they deserve it if they ever said anything that isn't true. His definition is dumb because he can say it is "completely different" when Kristi Winters does the same thing with relatively circumstantial differences. Unless it was something praiseworthy with circumstantial differences, then it is very similar to what Vee did.

And whenever he was cornered he'd just compare what was said to something a feminist said. When really all Geekthulu said is to think before he acts rather than try the tactical individualism of not being responsible for what you allow to happen. Just done to make needless irrelevancies after you won the argument (according to yourself even). He is perfectly fine with being tribal when it suits him, but an individualist when any kind of fault rears its head.

But at least the AIU guys agree with him. As if you can only dispute accusations with doxing. And he admits it was meaningless in the end since no patrons pulled support. And that lying about being a doctor is bad, much worse than seriously pretending you're part black.

"Make arguments, dont lower yourself to slander" - Veemonro. Vee has no ideas to attack. I've never seen him make an argument, just gotchas.
Also, Vee didnt divulge personal info of the people involved with Spino and his e-gf. And you could reasonably prove he was at least mismanaging things as it was happening.

He was just here to try to proselytize Liberalistism and poison the well for the AltRight, but it isn't collectivist! He's just butthurt the Liberalist circus isnt going well and that Sargon is being mocked so he lashes out.

There was a Superman comic about Lois Lane becoming a black woman in the 60s. It was always pretty progressive. But it wasn't as obnoviously stupid drivel. I'd imagine anyway. And in the 90s, DC comics gave Green Lantern a gay friend who went from closeted to an activist for gays after being gay bashed. Vee is right that they're more ideological than profit driven. But he's also pretty stupid to think people dont like seeing characters of the same race. The only reason it isnt working now is Blacks and Hispanics dont read comics, white guys do and are turned off by the needless diversity

/pol/ is only altright when an anti-altright claim can be made btw. When /pol/ does something people like...