Advertisement
Guest User

'wright' vs back

a guest
Apr 22nd, 2017
487
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.51 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Adam Back [8:20 PM]
  2. vlad2vlad i'm looking forward to the output of the apocryphal PhD's :slightly_smiling_face: linkedin is seemingly devoid of anyone connected and it's a pretty small space where meaningful contributors who know enough to make research inroads are mostly known in the community. in short i dont believe it.
  3.  
  4.  
  5. ----- Today April 22nd, 2017 -----
  6. Roberto Vlad [2:43 AM]
  7. @adam3us I'll see what proof I can get. Can you confirm though, how many actual cryptographers are currently working for Blockstream or Core? Thx.
  8.  
  9. Roberto Vlad [4:58 AM]
  10. @adam3us Answer from Dr. Wright:
  11.  
  12. [4:58]
  13. Dr Wright wants people who can think, not who already know.
  14.  
  15. He says you should try to look for creative people, not those with a social media bent.
  16.  
  17. There are over 2,000 PhDs in the CompSci in the US each year. There are 5,000+ globally.
  18.  
  19. This is a total now of 100,000 CompSci PhDs.
  20.  
  21. Add maths and fields including combinatorics and you have over 1,000,000 people.
  22.  
  23. [4:58]
  24. And...
  25.  
  26. [4:59]
  27. Mr Back always thinks small. He did in his 2008 emails and he does now. The only thing he did was to pass Wei's email to me. Tell him thank you for that.
  28.  
  29. [4:59]
  30. Thank you, @adam3us
  31.  
  32. [4:59]
  33. :)
  34.  
  35. Alphonse Pace
  36. [5:01 AM]
  37. comp sci phds prove they dont know how to think
  38.  
  39. [5:01]
  40. otherwise they wouldnt be comp sci phds
  41.  
  42. Roberto Vlad [5:02 AM]
  43. @adam3us Now you started something:
  44.  
  45. [5:02]
  46. Dr. Wright wants to know: why you said that you invented the PoW in Bitcoin... You both know that you used a different system.
  47.  
  48. Roberto Vlad [5:17 AM]
  49. Some more good stuff:
  50.  
  51. [5:17]
  52. Also ask him why they are pushing a patented technology (SegWit)?
  53.  
  54. Did he not understand that just as short Schnorr signatures are in a lapsed patent did not mean that other technologies derived from this are not still in patent?
  55.  
  56. [5:17]
  57. And that short Schorr has flaws... only the extended versions are sound... but these still have patents covering them. Does he know of those from French Telecom? Did they bother checking?
  58.  
  59. [5:18]
  60. Ask him why Aura et. al's paper uses the same hash puzzle as Bitcoin with the same solution format:
  61. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.73.1148&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  62.  
  63. And why he has an interactive challenge in hashcash and if this is anything like what Bitcoin uses :)
  64.  
  65. [5:18]
  66. Why would he allow this page:
  67. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hashcash
  68.  
  69. When Hashcash used a different format to Bitcoin... See P 4 of Aura et. al 2001
  70.  
  71. [5:18]
  72. Ask him... where are any similar code structures in the following
  73. https://web.archive.org/web/20040819222039/http://www.hashcash.org:80/source/old/hashcash-0.15.zip
  74.  
  75. [5:18]
  76. Ok: FIGHT!!!! :)
  77.  
  78. [5:23]
  79. ------
  80.  
  81. [5:23]
  82. My Code:
  83.  
  84. // Check proof of work matches claimed amount
  85. if (CBigNum().SetCompact(nBits) > bnProofOfWorkLimit)
  86. return error("CheckBlock() : nBits below minimum work");
  87. if (GetHash() > CBigNum().SetCompact(nBits).getuint256())
  88. return error("CheckBlock() : hash doesn't match nBits");
  89.  
  90. [5:23]
  91. -----
  92.  
  93. [5:24]
  94. Adam's code:
  95.  
  96. /* -*- Mode: C; c-file-style: "bsd" -*- */
  97.  
  98. #if !defined( _hashcash_h )
  99. #define _hashcash_h
  100.  
  101. #if defined( __cplusplus )
  102. extern "C" {
  103. #endif
  104.  
  105. extern int verbose_flag;
  106. extern int no_purge_flag;
  107.  
  108. #define MAX_UTCTIME 13
  109.  
  110. time_t from_utctime( const char[MAX_UTCTIME+1] );
  111. int to_utctime( char[MAX_UTCTIME+1], int len, time_t );
  112.  
  113. #if defined( __cplusplus )
  114. }
  115. #endif
  116.  
  117. #endif
  118.  
  119. [5:24]
  120. ----
  121.  
  122. [5:24]
  123. Code talks, bullshit walks... <---- Satoshi's words! ;)
  124.  
  125. [5:24]
  126. ----
  127.  
  128. [5:25]
  129. Your move, Dr. Back @adam3us
  130.  
  131. [5:25]
  132. BTW, technically, I don't even work here. This is kinda like a pick-up game. :)
  133.  
  134. [5:27]
  135. For crying outloud Adam, you got Satoshi all worked up now. Try to not do that.
  136.  
  137. [5:27]
  138. ---
  139.  
  140. [5:27]
  141. And finally, Tell him I was not interested in his small group in 2008 and I am far less interested now. I stopped watching the cypherpunk lists in the 90s as it already had gone to shit.
  142.  
  143. Real mathematicians and others work, they do not spend their time diss'ing one another on social media.
  144.  
  145. I was not a part of it in 2008 and I am not a part now and neither are the people we hire.
  146.  
  147. mrhodl [5:29 AM]
  148. https://bitcoincore.slack.com/archives/C0NGV6P7H/p1492864072765630 but I thought JVP met Satoshi in 2005 at a cypherpunk conference? He even has the picture to prove it.
  149.  
  150. Roberto Vlad [5:30 AM]
  151. Going to a conference isn't the same as being on the mailing list. Maybe he was there for the free food. <----- my words.
  152.  
  153. mrhodl [5:30 AM]
  154. No no..He was specifically talking about Bitcoin and JVP pointed him to the right tent
  155.  
  156. Roberto Vlad [5:31 AM]
  157. Dispute the code Dr. Wright provided not subjective dramatizations.
  158.  
  159. mrhodl
  160. [5:31 AM]
  161. We've never seen the picture so it could be all bullshit
  162.  
  163. [5:31]
  164. I'll let Adam dispute code
  165.  
  166. [5:31]
  167. I'm illiterate
  168.  
  169. Roberto Vlad [5:32 AM]
  170. Lol. I'm a hacker.
  171.  
  172. mrhodl
  173. [5:32 AM]
  174. :+1::skin-tone-2:
  175.  
  176. Roberto Vlad [5:32 AM]
  177. SNAP:
  178.  
  179. [5:32]
  180. -----
  181.  
  182. [5:33]
  183. And finally...
  184.  
  185. “No comment on that,” replies Back. “Don’t like to speculate on who Satoshi might be. I think it’s probably a good thing that Satoshi is anonymous because you know there’s a lot of political pressure that could land on somebody who is seen to somehow have control and all sorts of things.”
  186.  
  187. Yes, he wants the fame... tell him it is a shame that he cannot operate in competition and that he needs to form a socialist monopoly to hold his power, but all such groups collapse.
  188.  
  189. [5:33]
  190. ----
  191.  
  192. Adam Back [10:39 AM]
  193. vlad2vlad i consider myself an applied cryptographer. there are many others working on core with similar skill sets.
  194.  
  195. Roberto Vlad [10:54 AM]
  196. It is time for WAR!!! Grab on to something!!!!
  197.  
  198. Roberto Vlad [11:27 AM]
  199. Dr Wright is gonna prove 16 of his 17 degrees. He uses other people's technology, but make no mistake, he is a ** mathematician **
  200.  
  201. [11:27]
  202. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2953900
  203.  
  204. Gregory Sanders [11:31 AM]
  205. a mathematician who can't do a proper digital signature, sad!
  206.  
  207. [11:35]
  208. "ABSTRACT VIEWS
  209. 48"
  210.  
  211. moli [12:33 PM]
  212. @vlad2vlad is such a :craig_wright_troll: sucker, the only special one
  213.  
  214. Roberto Vlad [12:55 PM]
  215. I'm smart. I'm special. I'm important.
  216.  
  217.  
  218. Roberto Vlad [1:16 PM]
  219. @adam3us never piss off an Aussie:
  220.  
  221. [1:16]
  222. Oh, tell Adam...
  223. This glorified self aggrandising just belittles him.
  224. "bitcoin is hashcash extended with inflation contron"
  225.  
  226. [1:16]
  227. ---
  228.  
  229. [1:17]
  230. Lol. You gotta admit, Wright is funny.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement