Lesta Nediam LNC2016-04-02 2040 +cabadejo

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-04-02 2040 +cabadejo
https://plus.google.com/108131621397475586556/posts/5dB5337MBqh
https://pastebin.com/Q3JyrnRx
__


+cabadejo __ A few points: The lie system withholds sufficient proof - that is its chief strategy. It does this to force each person's imagination to fill in the blanks. When a person imagines something to be the case - not much can persuade them otherwise.



The lack of sufficient proof as a common denominator between lie system events and claims is the only "proof" we have. And it is the only "proof" we can ever expect to have (beyond duping delight and misspeaking which are only considered "soft mistakes" by "normal people").



However - this is enough for honest and intelligent people. Intelligent people are able to understand what it means. It takes a certain intellect to understand these concept just as it takes a person of a certain strength to lift a certain weight. If a person isn't strong enough - they can't lift it. That does not mean the person is bad - it just means that this isn't for them.



No matter what we point out it will never be good enough for stupid and dishonest people.



That is the situation.



*A library of glitches is only of use for us.* It is for our benefit so that we don't go and post a video suggesting something is X when really it is Not-X. It is so we can avoid making a mistake that will be held against us forever more even though we are right.



For example - I pointed out that "Peekay" focused on the number "333" but because I also pointed out the "scrolling glitch" (which turned out to be nothing) it gave stupid people and dishonest people a "way out" - a way to avoid accepting (or examining) the central point and conclusion.



Thus a library of glitches is something we would build up over a long period of time - bit by bit as we come across things - and it would be something for us to draw upon to avoid making "scrolling glitch" errors.



(Mind you - the "masking glitch" errors are distinct - I would not classify the blinking oddities or mouth expansion anomalies as necessarily masking glitches - they *could* be related - but not necessarily. The "eye/mouth/frame" glitches are more "peculiarities" for us to notice. They are practice for us to notice "the unusual" etc. But I wouldn't necessarily run with them and I wouldn't emphasise them over traditional masking glitches etc.)



Also - a library of glitches can never be complete. It would always be a "work in progress". No library can contain an example of every possible glitch and that is a deal-breaking problem. Because at all times a "normal person" can simply dismiss anything we point out as a "glitch" that "just hadn't yet been catalogued".



The point of pointing out the "masking glitches" is to say to "normal people" - "Hey, have you ever seen THIS kind of thing before in known good footage? Isn't it strange that after 15+ years there does not exist 10 minutes of footage that is free from problems?"



And if they have not seen that particular glitch in known good footage then they cannot dismiss the possibility that it is meaningful. However - if we include EVERY glitch/oddity we open ourselves up to pointing out an innocent glitch (a "false positive") and the "normal person" dismissing everything like what happened with the "scrolling glitch" which I so foolishly focused on (a mistake I will *never* make again).



So yes - a glitch library is good - it is useful - it is something we should do - but it will be more useful as a private thing.



We can't do everything for everyone and we cannot be all things to all people. Not many people have the right mind for these topics. For many months I have been trying to figure out how best to reach those people (which is why I continue to talk to anyone/everyone and write huge long messages to them - because I am continually figuring things out).



At some point we have to say "I have tried to help you. I have pointed out some things and it is not my fault you cannot also see them". The "revolution" will begin when enough intelligent and honest people become aware of the problem. THEN the stupid, unobservant and mentally ill people will follow.



But we can do only so much for people. We can hold people's hands and baby them so much. I have been extremely patient with Anthony B and his absurd assertion about "Jeff C" being "Stefan Molyneux" (a claim probably started by "Jeff C" himself because he only wishes he could be thought of as a "clever person" like "Stefan Molyneux").



I have made an effort to reach Anthony B. If he cannot be reasoned with then it means he is either lying, stupid or insane (or some combination of the three). To be expected to "prove him wrong" would be as foolish as being expected to show every known good glitch to a "normal person" etc.



(I'm trying to give an "analogy" - to say that some responsibility must rest on the audience - the audience cannot expect everything to be done for them. No one has the time nor inclination for that.)



Finally: the glitches on the "ISS" won't disappear unless there becomes some other way to doubt it. That is the prediction my understanding of the lie system makes. If my understanding of the lie system is correct then what we see will always be doubtable - but the way it is doubted can be expected to change (such as with every "ISS crew change there are differences).




__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w