Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jun 15th, 2015
265
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.19 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Return-Path: <pbandel@1starnet.com>
  2. Received: from MICKEY.1starnet.com (smtp.1starnet.com. [208.180.87.150])
  3. by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ec3si413971obb.86.2015.06.03.12.08.47
  4. for <swalker@moorelawfirm.com>;
  5. Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
  6. Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pbandel@1starnet.com designates 208.180.87.150 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.180.87.150;
  7. Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
  8. spf=pass (google.com: domain of pbandel@1starnet.com designates 208.180.87.150 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pbandel@1starnet.com
  9. Received: from ([75.109.204.197]) by 1starnet.com with MailEnable WebMail; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:08:36 -0500
  10. To: <pbandel@1starnet.com>, <swalker@moorelawfirm.com>
  11. From: "Dr Phil" <pbandel@1starnet.com>
  12. Subject: New Correspondance
  13. Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:08:36 -0500
  14. Message-ID: <B86AB899EA964A98AF2EE57A67F73DFF.MAI@1starnet.com>
  15. MIME-Version: 1.0
  16. X-Mailer: MailEnable WebMail.NET
  17. X-MimeOLE: Produced By MailEnable WebMail.NET V8.60.0.0
  18. X-Read: 0
  19. Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
  20. boundary="--=_Part_F5D47F63BFCE444B959B54BAD4A25E83"
  21. X-Priority: 3
  22. X-MSMail-Priority: Medium
  23. Reply-To: pbandel@1starnet.com
  24. X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000
  25.  
  26. This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
  27.  
  28. ----=_Part_F5D47F63BFCE444B959B54BAD4A25E83
  29. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
  30. Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
  31.  
  32. Dear Steve,
  33.  
  34. The letter I faxed to from the Houston firm evidently is both a collection =
  35. agency and law firm of some sorts and I just got a call from them saying=
  36. "you have failed to respond in the 30 alloted days and I no longer have=
  37. legal representation and they need a response" to decide to proceed wit=
  38. h litigation.
  39.  
  40. Would it be appropiate to send a letter like you sent the first firm=3F Ple=
  41. ase give them a call and say you are reperesenting me, please.
  42.  
  43. Thank you.Dee and I are going to Sao Paulo for Rotary Convention this eve a=
  44. nd I will be back June 22.
  45. So my checking email may be irregular.
  46.  
  47. Peace!
  48.  
  49. Phil
  50. Phillip B Bandel, MD
  51.  
  52. pbandel@1starnet.com
  53.  
  54.  
  55. ----- Original Message -----
  56. From: Dr Phil [mailto:pbandel@1starnet.com]
  57. To: swalker@moorefirm.com
  58. Sent: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:24:58 -0500
  59. Subject:
  60.  
  61. Dear Steve (4-24-2015 PM),
  62.  
  63. See FAX...
  64.  
  65. So, they moved it to a TX law firm...what does this mean to you=3F I presum=
  66. e you will respond similar to previously...
  67.  
  68. Thank you for your help.
  69.  
  70. Peace,
  71.  
  72. Phil
  73. Phillip B Bandel, MD
  74. pbandel@1starnet.com
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79.  
  80. ----- Original Message -----
  81. From: Steve Walker [mailto:swalker@moorefirm.com]
  82. To: pbandel@1starnet.com
  83. Sent: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:58:35 -0600
  84. Subject:
  85.  
  86. Phil,
  87.  
  88. I believe I sent you a copy of the letter that was faxed to Mr. McCall.
  89. There has been no response. I can certainly call and follow up if you
  90. would like. Sometimes, however, when someone is threatening to sue you for
  91. money and they aren't doing anything, stirring the pot can be
  92. counter-productive. My fax confirmation sheet shows that the fax went
  93. through so I would presume he got the letter. I don't know if he has
  94. requested documents from his clients, whether they are reconsidering their
  95. position or what. Do you want me to contact him or play the wait and see
  96. game=3F Obviously, we could get a lawsuit out of the blue but I would
  97. certainly hope they would contact me first given that I reached out to them
  98. in the letter. Please advise.
  99.  
  100.  
  101. J. Stephen Walker
  102. The Moore Law Firm, L.L.P.
  103. 100 North Main Street
  104. Paris, Texas 75460
  105. (903) 784-4393 phone
  106. (903) 783-0042 fax
  107.  
  108. This email is confidential, may contain information protected by the
  109. attorney-client privilege, and is intended for the above-listed
  110. recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please do not
  111. read it and notify me immediately. Thereafter, please delete the message
  112. in its entirety. Thank you.
  113.  
  114. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Dr Phil <pbandel@1starnet.com> wrote:
  115.  
  116. > Dear Stephen,
  117. >
  118. > I am wondering if we are to expect a response from Victor McCall or this
  119. > length of time to respond is to be expected=3F Hope all is well with you =
  120. and
  121. > yours.
  122. >
  123. > Peace,
  124. >
  125. > Dr Phil
  126. >
  127. > Phillip B Bandel, MD
  128. >
  129. >
  130.  
  131.  
  132. ----=_Part_F5D47F63BFCE444B959B54BAD4A25E83--
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement