Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Return-Path: <pbandel@1starnet.com>
- Received: from MICKEY.1starnet.com (smtp.1starnet.com. [208.180.87.150])
- by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ec3si413971obb.86.2015.06.03.12.08.47
- for <swalker@moorelawfirm.com>;
- Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
- Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pbandel@1starnet.com designates 208.180.87.150 as permitted sender) client-ip=208.180.87.150;
- Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
- spf=pass (google.com: domain of pbandel@1starnet.com designates 208.180.87.150 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pbandel@1starnet.com
- Received: from ([75.109.204.197]) by 1starnet.com with MailEnable WebMail; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:08:36 -0500
- To: <pbandel@1starnet.com>, <swalker@moorelawfirm.com>
- From: "Dr Phil" <pbandel@1starnet.com>
- Subject: New Correspondance
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:08:36 -0500
- Message-ID: <B86AB899EA964A98AF2EE57A67F73DFF.MAI@1starnet.com>
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- X-Mailer: MailEnable WebMail.NET
- X-MimeOLE: Produced By MailEnable WebMail.NET V8.60.0.0
- X-Read: 0
- Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
- boundary="--=_Part_F5D47F63BFCE444B959B54BAD4A25E83"
- X-Priority: 3
- X-MSMail-Priority: Medium
- Reply-To: pbandel@1starnet.com
- X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ----=_Part_F5D47F63BFCE444B959B54BAD4A25E83
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
- Dear Steve,
- The letter I faxed to from the Houston firm evidently is both a collection =
- agency and law firm of some sorts and I just got a call from them saying=
- "you have failed to respond in the 30 alloted days and I no longer have=
- legal representation and they need a response" to decide to proceed wit=
- h litigation.
- Would it be appropiate to send a letter like you sent the first firm=3F Ple=
- ase give them a call and say you are reperesenting me, please.
- Thank you.Dee and I are going to Sao Paulo for Rotary Convention this eve a=
- nd I will be back June 22.
- So my checking email may be irregular.
- Peace!
- Phil
- Phillip B Bandel, MD
- pbandel@1starnet.com
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Dr Phil [mailto:pbandel@1starnet.com]
- To: swalker@moorefirm.com
- Sent: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:24:58 -0500
- Subject:
- Dear Steve (4-24-2015 PM),
- See FAX...
- So, they moved it to a TX law firm...what does this mean to you=3F I presum=
- e you will respond similar to previously...
- Thank you for your help.
- Peace,
- Phil
- Phillip B Bandel, MD
- pbandel@1starnet.com
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Steve Walker [mailto:swalker@moorefirm.com]
- To: pbandel@1starnet.com
- Sent: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:58:35 -0600
- Subject:
- Phil,
- I believe I sent you a copy of the letter that was faxed to Mr. McCall.
- There has been no response. I can certainly call and follow up if you
- would like. Sometimes, however, when someone is threatening to sue you for
- money and they aren't doing anything, stirring the pot can be
- counter-productive. My fax confirmation sheet shows that the fax went
- through so I would presume he got the letter. I don't know if he has
- requested documents from his clients, whether they are reconsidering their
- position or what. Do you want me to contact him or play the wait and see
- game=3F Obviously, we could get a lawsuit out of the blue but I would
- certainly hope they would contact me first given that I reached out to them
- in the letter. Please advise.
- J. Stephen Walker
- The Moore Law Firm, L.L.P.
- 100 North Main Street
- Paris, Texas 75460
- (903) 784-4393 phone
- (903) 783-0042 fax
- This email is confidential, may contain information protected by the
- attorney-client privilege, and is intended for the above-listed
- recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please do not
- read it and notify me immediately. Thereafter, please delete the message
- in its entirety. Thank you.
- On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Dr Phil <pbandel@1starnet.com> wrote:
- > Dear Stephen,
- >
- > I am wondering if we are to expect a response from Victor McCall or this
- > length of time to respond is to be expected=3F Hope all is well with you =
- and
- > yours.
- >
- > Peace,
- >
- > Dr Phil
- >
- > Phillip B Bandel, MD
- >
- >
- ----=_Part_F5D47F63BFCE444B959B54BAD4A25E83--
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement