Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- he's a nice guy and knows math pretty well i think but sucks at teaching
- well the main problem is, he covers way too many topics
- and you're not gonna know what he's gonna put on the test either because he basically blindsights you
- he doesn't accurately say what he does
- for example one time i was like "oh are we gonna have a dijkstra's algo problem on the test" and he was like "yes definitely we will" so i reviewed it but there was no dijkstra's algo problem
- and i spent a lot of my time studying probability because he said it'd be there but there were zero probability problems
- yeah well it's a big fucking book and i have other classes, do you expect me to spend all my time doing this class
- especially with a blanket math topic like discrete math, you can't be covering too much shit and expect the students to learn a lot since it's more like a grab bag intro class rather than a focused topic
- i guess he's aware that his stuff is too difficult so he puts a hella big ass curve on everything, but that's not how it should be
- if he didn't put those kinds of curves, i would most definitely have gotten a D
- his lectures are haphazard and unprepared
- he basically walks into class, plops the textbook onto the projector and reads it word for word
- by reading i mean mumbles it
- he does sometimes demonstrate some of the problems but he just does it as if he's doing it by himself
- think yest but at least yest tries to explain the shit
- and yest doesn't just read out the whole textbook
- that should be plenty specific
- yeah he's a nice dude, probably not a mean bone in his body, but he'd be better off doing research or something (which honestly seems like what he wanted to do instead of teaching as far as i can tell)
- on one hand i could have studied harder because i don't think discrete math itself is actually that hard, but then what's the point of paying for a class if the lectures are useless? like even the few times i did study ahead they were useless (unlike yest's which are actually useful if you study a bit ahead because he sort of outlines the kinds of problems he'd give)
- if i did study to my maximum potential i would have gotten an A but uncurved would have probably been like a C or a B lol (and the reasons are stated above)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement