Lucent

COVID vs. vaccine

Mar 28th, 2025
76
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 13.64 KB | Science | 0 0
  1. Physiological Impact of an mRNA COVID-19 Booster vs. SARS-CoV-2 Infection
  2.  
  3. Spike Protein Exposure: Vaccine vs. Infection
  4.  
  5. mRNA Booster Antigen Load: A typical mRNA booster (e.g. 10–30 µg of spike-encoding mRNA) causes the body to produce only a very small amount of spike protein in total. Experimental measurements indicate that a 30 µg mRNA dose leads to on the order of 5–10 nanograms of spike (S1 subunit) entering the circulation over about two weeks. This corresponds to roughly 10^9 spike molecules produced and released systemically. (Most of the spike remains localized in cells at the injection site or lymph nodes, with only trace amounts detectable in blood.)
  6.  
  7. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Viral Load: In contrast, a full-blown SARS-CoV-2 infection involves the virus replicating to high titers throughout the body. It’s estimated that an infected person can harbor on the order of 10^9–10^11 virions during the course of infection. Each virion has ~24 spike protein trimers on its surface (≈72 spike molecules per virus). Total spike protein produced in an average infection is therefore enormous – on the order of 7.2×10^13 to 7.2×10^15 spike molecules (tens of trillions of spike proteins). In mass terms, this equates to roughly tens of micrograms up to milligrams of spike protein generated inside the body by the virus.
  8.  
  9. Quantitative Comparison: The spike protein exposure from a booster is orders of magnitude lower than from an infection. Roughly, a 10 µg mRNA booster dose will produce well under 1% of the spike protein that an average COVID-19 infection generates – on the order of 0.01–0.1% by rough calculation. For example, ~10^8–10^9 spike molecules from a booster vs. ~10^14 from infection means the vaccine’s antigen burden is only a tiny fraction of that in infection. This stark difference in spike quantity underlies many of the downstream differences in physiological impact.
  10.  
  11.  
  12. ACE2 Receptor Binding and Downregulation
  13.  
  14. After mRNA Vaccination (Minimal ACE2 Interference): The spike protein produced by the vaccine is designed to stay anchored on the surface of the cells that translate the mRNA, rather than freely circulating. Only very low levels of free spike are found in plasma post-vaccination (often undetectable, but in some individuals on the order of 30–150 pg/mL transiently). This peak concentration (~1.5×10^-12 M) is about 100,000-fold below the level needed to occupy even half of the available ACE2 receptors in the body. (The dissociation constant K_d for the spike–ACE2 interaction is ~1.2×10^-7 M, meaning the picomolar spike from a vaccine is negligible for ACE2 binding.) In practical terms, vaccine-derived spike is too scarce and short-lived to significantly downregulate ACE2 in organs away from the injection site. Empirical evidence supports this – for example, an animal study using a spike-based vaccine at 10× the normal dose found no ACE2 reduction or added cardiac injury in mice. This indicates that the vaccine’s spike protein did not measurably disrupt ACE2 function in heart tissue even at high exposure.
  15.  
  16. During SARS-CoV-2 Infection (Extensive ACE2 Downregulation): In a real infection, the virus uses ACE2 as the entry receptor, binding and internalizing ACE2 on host cells to gain entry. This leads to a significant loss/downregulation of ACE2 wherever the virus replicates. Studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 infection directly reduces ACE2 expression on cells (e.g. via lysosomal degradation of ACE2 after spike–ACE2 binding). The result is an acute ACE2 deficiency in tissues like the lungs, endothelium, and heart during infection, which is believed to contribute to pathology. For instance, endothelial cells exposed to viral spike protein exhibit lowered ACE2 levels and impaired nitric oxide signaling, and infected lung cells lose ACE2, which worsens inflammation and lung injury. In an uncontrolled infection, countless cells across multiple organs can have their ACE2 receptors occupied and downregulated by the virus, whereas cells in a vaccinated person are only producing spike in a limited area and not actively depleting ACE2 throughout the body.
  17.  
  18. Comparison: The ACE2-related impact of a booster is minute compared to that of an infection. Quantitatively, the fraction of ACE2 receptors that might be engaged or downregulated by vaccine-produced spike is vanishingly small (on the order of 0.001% of the ACE2 affected during a widespread infection). In a COVID-19 infection, ACE2 can be widely dysregulated – a key factor in multi-organ damage – whereas a booster’s effect on ACE2 is essentially negligible. In short, 10 µg of mRNA spike induces virtually none of the ACE2 suppression that the live virus does.
  19.  
  20.  
  21. Inflammatory Immune Response (Cytokines)
  22.  
  23. mRNA Booster Response: An mRNA vaccine causes the immune system to recognize the spike protein and mount a response, but without rampant virus replication the inflammatory response is far more controlled. Clinical studies show that after vaccination, inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) rise only modestly and transiently, if at all. For example, one study found no significant elevation in IL-6 levels after a booster dose compared to pre-vaccination baseline. When increases do occur, they are usually mild – e.g. IL-6 might reach on the order of a few pg/mL to a few tens of pg/mL transiently. (Normal baseline IL-6 is <4 pg/mL in healthy adults.) Even in rare intense reactions to the vaccine, IL-6 has been recorded around 200–250 pg/mL, which is a notable increase but still only a fraction of the levels seen in severe COVID-19. Overall, the vaccine’s innate immune activation is short-lived and self-limited, often manifesting as a day or two of fever, soreness, or fatigue, without the high-grade systemic inflammation that causes organ damage.
  24.  
  25. Infection-Induced Inflammation: SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially if moderate or severe, triggers a much larger inflammatory cascade. The immune system’s reaction to extensive viral replication can lead to a “cytokine storm” in severe cases. IL-6 levels in hospitalized COVID-19 patients commonly soar into the tens or hundreds of pg/mL, and in the worst cases can exceed 1000 pg/mL. (For context, IL-6 in severe COVID averaged ~57 pg/mL in one meta-analysis, versus ~17 pg/mL in mild cases, and extreme cases have reached 10,000+ pg/mL.) This hyperinflammation is what drives much of the lung damage (ARDS), shock, and multi-organ failure in critical COVID-19. Multiple inflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-8, TNFα, interferon, CRP, etc.) are markedly elevated during infection – far beyond levels observed post-vaccination. For example, C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammation marker, often climbs into double-digit mg/dL in COVID-19, whereas post-vaccine CRP changes are minimal.
  26.  
  27. Comparison: The systemic inflammatory burden from a COVID infection dwarfs that from a vaccine. Numerically, peak cytokine levels after an mRNA booster are typically well below 10% of those seen in severe COVID-19. In many individuals, the vaccine’s cytokine perturbation might be 1% or less of an infection’s effect (since often only low-level IL-6/TNF are induced, versus massive elevations during disease). Thus, in terms of cytokine-mediated harm, a booster’s effect is only a tiny fraction of the inflammatory response caused by the virus. The vaccine “stimulates” the immune system enough to build immunity, but does not unleash the pathological inflammation that an unchecked viral infection does.
  28.  
  29.  
  30. Multi-Organ Effects and Tissue Damage
  31.  
  32. Vaccine (Localized, Non-Destructive): An mRNA booster remains localized and controlled in the body. The injected mRNA primarily goes into muscle cells and lymph nodes near the injection site. Those cells briefly produce spike protein to train the immune system, and a small amount of spike or mRNA may enter circulation, but not enough to infect other cells. There is no active virus present to spread to organs, so direct tissue damage is limited to minor local reactogenicity. Aside from the injection site (which may get sore or inflamed as the immune system reacts), other organs typically see no significant spike exposure or injury. Animal biodistribution studies confirm that lipid-nanoparticle mRNA can travel to certain organs (liver, spleen, etc.) in tiny quantities, but this low-level distribution has not been associated with organ damage at the doses used for vaccination. Clinically, serious organ-specific injuries from mRNA vaccines are extremely rare. For example, myocarditis (heart inflammation) occurs in only a few per million vaccine recipients, and cases are generally mild. No widespread cell death or organ failure is observed from the booster. In experimental models, even deliberately high doses of spike via vaccination did not cause organ damage – one study noted that an mRNA-based spike vaccine “does not affect [cell] survival and function” in heart tissues and did not aggravate heart damage in mice, even at ten times the normal dose. This underscores that the spike produced by the vaccine in situ is not causing the multi-organ cytopathic damage that the virus does.
  33.  
  34. Infection (Disseminated Multi-Organ Damage): A full SARS-CoV-2 infection can affect virtually every organ system. The virus particles can enter the bloodstream (especially in severe cases) and disseminate, or infect local tissues like the lungs and then spread via inflammation and microthrombi to other sites. Autopsy studies of COVID-19 patients consistently show viral material and damage in multiple organs: lungs (diffuse alveolar damage), blood vessels (endothelial inflammation and microthromboses), heart (myocardial cell necrosis, viral myocarditis), kidneys (acute tubular necrosis), brain (strokes and encephalitis), liver and spleen (necrosis and immune cell depletion), etc.. These pathologies reflect both the direct effect of the virus infecting ACE2-expressing cells in those organs and the indirect effects of massive inflammation and coagulopathy. For instance, COVID-19 can cause endotheliitis – viral spike/virus binding to ACE2 on blood vessel lining triggers inflammation of vessels, leading to clotting that can cut off blood flow to tissues (hence strokes, heart attacks, kidney injury). Multi-organ failure in severe COVID is a result of this widespread assault. In short, the infection’s spike proteins and virus particles disseminate throughout the body, causing damage in situ in various tissues – something a localized vaccine cannot do.
  35.  
  36. Comparison: The scope of organ involvement from an infection is vastly greater than from a booster. An mRNA booster might cause temporary localized tissue reaction (e.g. a sore arm or swollen lymph node), whereas COVID-19 can cause permanent damage to lungs, heart, vessels, kidneys, brain, and more. In quantitative terms, one could argue the overall tissue damage caused by a booster is effectively 0% of that caused by a serious SARS-CoV-2 infection – i.e. several orders of magnitude less. Even a rough estimate (say, comparing the number of cells killed or organs affected) would place the vaccine’s direct harm at well under 1% of the virus’s. Practically, the booster does not kill cells throughout organs or trigger organ failure; the virus can and does. Any multi-organ “spike protein-related” effects (such as endothelial ACE2 downregulation or microthrombi) are profound in infection but minimal to unobservable after vaccination.
  37.  
  38.  
  39. Overall Relative Impact (Booster vs. Infection)
  40.  
  41. Putting it all together, the individual-level biological harm from an mRNA COVID-19 booster is only a minute fraction of that from a natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Across multiple objective metrics:
  42.  
  43. Spike protein load: nanograms from a booster vs. milligrams from infection (on the order of 10^9 vs 10^13–10^15 spike molecules) – roughly 0.01–0.1% as much antigen.
  44.  
  45. ACE2 receptor downregulation: essentially negligible with booster (spike far below levels needed to significantly bind ACE2) vs. widespread ACE2 loss in infection (virtually 100% ACE2 internalization in infected tissues) – on the order of <0.01% the ACE2 interference.
  46.  
  47. Inflammatory cytokines: mild, transient increases with booster vs. massive, potentially organ-damaging increases with infection – the booster’s cytokine response is perhaps a few percent of a severe infection’s in magnitude.
  48.  
  49. Tissue/organ damage: confined to the injection site or not occurring at all with booster, versus multi-organ damage in COVID-19 – effectively 0–1% of the tissue pathology caused by a serious infection.
  50.  
  51.  
  52. In concrete terms, a 10 µg mRNA booster dose is estimated to produce on the order of only ~0.1% (or less) of the ACE2 binding and systemic impact caused by an average SARS-CoV-2 infection. The vaccine’s effects are sharply limited in scope: it triggers an immune response without causing the widespread cellular infection, ACE2 depletion, and organ injury that define a COVID-19 illness. All available experimental and clinical data thus indicate that, quantitatively, the physiological “harm” imparted by the mRNA booster is several hundred- to thousand-fold less than that of the actual virus itself, across the relevant biological processes of spike protein action and host response.
  53.  
  54. Sources: Academic and clinical studies comparing vaccine antigen levels and host responses to those during infection, mechanistic analyses of spike–ACE2 interactions, and measurements of inflammatory markers and tissue injury in both scenarios have been used to support the above quantification. These objective data illustrate that the mRNA booster, while engaging the immune system, results in only a tiny fraction of the physiological disruption inflicted by a true SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment