Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Oct 14th, 2019
101
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.09 KB | None | 0 0
  1. For the Holy Scripture and nature both equally derive from the divine Word, the former as
  2. the dictation of the Holy Spirit, the latter as the most obedient executrix of God's commands;
  3. moreover, in order to adapt itself to the understanding of all people, it was appropriate for the
  4. Scripture to say many things which are different from absolute truth...; on the other hand,
  5. nature is inexorable (unalterable) and immutable, and she does not care at all whether or not her
  6. recondite (complex) reasons...are revealed to human understanding, and so she never
  7. transgresses the terms of the laws imposed on her; therefore, whatever sensory experience
  8. places before our eyes or necessary demonstrations prove to us concerning natural effects
  9. should not in any way be called into question on account of scriptural passages whose words
  10. appear to have a different meaning, since not every statement of the Scripture is bound to
  11. obligations as severely as each effect of nature...
  12. ...Given this, and moreover it being obvious that two truths can never contradict each other, the
  13. task of wise interpreters is to strive to find the true meanings of scriptural passages agreeing
  14. with those physical conclusions of which we are already certain and sure from clear sensory
  15. experience or from necessary demonstrations... I do not think it necessary to believe that the
  16. same God who has furnished us with senses, language, and intellect would want to bypass their
  17. use and give us by other means the information we can obtain with them. This applies
  18. especially to those sciences about which one can read only very small phrases and scattered
  19. conclusions in the Scripture, as is particularly the case for astronomy, of which it contains such
  20. a small portion that one does not even find in it the names of all the planets; but if the first
  21. sacred writers had been thinking of persuading the people about the arrangement and the
  22. movements of the heavenly bodies, they would not have treated of them so sparsely, which is to
  23. say almost nothing in comparison to the infinity of very lofty and admirable conclusions
  24. contained in such a science.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement