Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- 1. Socratic interrogation, i.e. burden of proof on everyone but him. His views don't need empirical justification
- 2. changes the subject when opponent gets going
- 3. Liberalism is both a start in position and a solution that will happen if we just do it right this time. I.e. he offers no solutions and contextualized other solutions against a hypothetical liberal future rather than the present reality. Ie he presents everything as in opposition to liberalism as a default state, so he can make trite arguments against it
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
