Advertisement
Lesta

5 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-16 0745 +Bobbin McBong

Jan 15th, 2016
34
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 11.82 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-16 0745 +Bobbin McBong
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUe4ILZqJLM&lc=z12ld1xpjnuoedtin04chrmzcwvccpfafjk
  3. https://pastebin.com/P9u5F7p5
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Bobbin McBong __ Oh the passion! I can believe that you believe what you're saying. Unfortunately you don't have the intellect to scrutinise your belief (which is founded exclusively on trust).
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12. Sadly, like so many average minds you are only intelligent enough to convince yourself that what you want to be real must be real.
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17. You cite "several nations" but what exactly do you mean? Do you mean they would rat on each other if it was a lie? That presupposes that apparently tense/strained, unfriendly or enemy nations (such as Russia and the US) do not in actuality cooperate. Are you so naΓ―ve that you believe "good cop, bad cop" does not or cannot work on a larger scale?
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. Or perhaps you just can't imagine a nation ever lying to its people? Maybe that's it. Maybe you have forgotten that you are trusting the same groups of people who you also believe drop bombs on children for the "greater good"? If you have no problem believing that just a few decades ago the US dropped atomic bombs on large numbers of innocent Japanese men, women and children then why would lying to large numbers of innocent men, women and children be an option that's off the table?
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27. According to you the slaughter of children is not a problem but to lie to children? Oh no! Not that! Taboo! Anything but that!
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32. You haven't thought any of this through whereas I have and I am magnitudes more intelligent than you.
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37. And this "data" you cite. Where is it? What gifts do you imagine it bestows upon the knower? Is having a real and manned space station the only possible way to acquire this magical "data"? According to you it must!
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42. Unsurprisingly you also talk about footage. *There is no footage of sustained duration genuine micro/zero gravity that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.* This footage you are ASSUMING exists simply does not. I have examined far more footage than you in far greater detail with the HOPE of being wrong. I WANT to find sufficient proof (footage that meets the outlined criteria) but nothing does. Every video is flawed in one or more ways. I know that you cannot have scrutinised it properly because *you believe it is f_kcing real!* How can you take a forensic examination seriously if your starting assumption is that it's real?! How can you possibly notice the multitude of glitches, cuts, edits and pans when you cannot take the task of analysing footage seriously? You can't. You aren't interested in the truth.
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46.  
  47. *You believe because you want it all to be true.* Oh the science! Oh the achievement! Do you feel proud? "Look at what my species has accomplished!" *You worthless f_kcing Neanderthal.* Like so many others you are afflicted with a reality-based fetish and a lifetime of living in a system that at every twist and turn encourages your imagination to fill in the blanks when all you really have are proof's appearances. *You are powerless to resist your unquestioning belief.*
  48.  
  49.  
  50.  
  51.  
  52. It must be left to history to figure out why people such as yourself - _in huge numbers_ - were so easily swindled by something so OBVIOUSLY fake during the 20th and 21st centuries. *If you saw the same "ISS" footage in any modern movie you would be bored and underwhelmed.* But like a child at a magic show you have suspended disbelief and just look at you go! You are so passionate with your unshakeable FAITH that you live in a world where adults who you believe routinely kill children (for the "greater good") *would never EVER dare lie to them* (also for the "greater good").
  53.  
  54.  
  55.  
  56.  
  57. If the "ISS" is real then it would be EASILY proved in a way no "conspiracy theorist" could deny. Most unlike the winner of last year's Wimbledon men's tennis final the "ISS" remains the easiest thing in the world to doubt. *So I must ask you* (knowing that the answer will be NO): *have you ever looked at the "ISS" through a telescope and made out any details?* _Have you?_ I know you haven't. *Only liars claim to have done so and I've busted more than a few.* One I recently posted about to my channel. It's a video titled: The "ISS" is BS - PROOF of a LIAR caught LYING about the "ISS"! (Lesta 2015-12-16) and you can view it here: watch?v=a4898fr4XP4
  58.  
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. You are spazzing out and attacking me for pointing out some very simple things. All photos and video that purports to be of the "ISS" from Earth that *make out details* are fake. It's really that simple. The only images you'll see "NASA" post are photos where all you see is a bright dot of light. You brought up nations so why do you suppose none of them have pointed this out? It's because your concept of "nations" and "governments" is completely f_kced. You haven't got a clue about the lie system we were all born into (which farms us like cattle and crops).
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. *You won't ever see a photo from the proud as crikey child, sibling or parent of an alleged "astronaut" as their loved one (and national hero) whizzes past in the sky some 400km above and purportedly up to 16 times each day (all according to the timetable we can consult online).* If it were real you would expect to see that kind of thing. Right? Just once, yes? If it were real there would by now exist a video of an "astronaut" clowning around doing as many somersaults as possible. Have you ever seen more than two or three somersaults? Why not ever six or seven? *These are just some of many things we would expect to see after literally decades of allegedly manned "space stations" but we don't.* It largely doesn't occur to people to think of these things because why would they? Like you they are belief controlled into accepting it is real (despite the routine glitches, cuts, edits and pans) and also because *the most difficult thing to notice can often be: what's missing?* But once our attention has been drawn to what's missing it can become the most glaring thing we notice. It can become *all* we notice.
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72. But we don't ever see such things. Instead we see the same simple and mundane magic tricks such as a single (though sometimes double) somersault and water bubbles. But you won't ever - never ever - see an interview being done with the Earth gracefully passing 400km by below. But if it's all legitimate and above board then why the f_kc not? Why *ever* not? You believe the "ISS" is a centabillion dollar super serious micro/zero gravity research facility with a breath-taking "Cupola" where incredible views of the Earth below are routinely had. Yet never will you see an interview done from what must be a genuine space station's centrepiece module. Imagine the incredible geography lessons that an "astronaut" could give! You won't ever see that happen and because of that you have no expectation of it ever happening. You don't notice what's missing and you can't miss what you've never seen. Use your brain, fool. Don't use your brain to convince yourself that it must be real when all you're really doing is inventing reasons to "explain away" all the things you now know should be present but aren't.
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76.  
  77. There is a simple reason for all of your shortcomings and it is because you are belief controlled and cannot see it for what it really is. *When you believe something is real you largely lose the ability to scrutinise and doubt.* Like a retard you start assuming the conclusion and making the arguments of spastics. *"It's real because it's real"* is chump logic.
  78.  
  79.  
  80.  
  81.  
  82. "It's real because it would require a vast and complex conspiracy" is a wilful misunderstanding and misapplication of "Occam's Razor" which it should be pointed out is at all times only a f_kcing guide and not ever a set in stone law or rule. Sometimes complicated and elaborate sh!t happens. Sometimes dishonest people organise and when they do it's like taking candy from a baby such as from belief controlled simpletons like you.
  83.  
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. And just because you can utter the words, *_"but it's easier to actually make than to get away with faking it!"_* it is an example of your internal belief bias because the simpler explanation for the many "masking glitches" that I have pointed out in my videos is better explained as evidence of the presence of fraud. So be consistent. If you will invoke "Occam's Razor" as so many of your peers seem happy to do then you'll need to explain why you don't apply it consistently and avoid using it when it would lead to an undesirable conclusion such as when explaining the presence of the numerous glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91.  
  92. And as for making it being easier than faking it well you do know that the alleged "ISS" is soon to be abandoned? Within the next decade it will be an abandoned building. If you could be honest for just a minute you would realise that even if the "ISS" were a real structure it could already be abandoned. But the fact it will be no more suggests "they" realise they are not going to be able to fool people like you forever. If the "ISS" is really an amazing zero gravity research facility then by abandoning it "they" are effectively admitting no further use or benefit exists. You have to be joking if you think "Virgin Galactic" will join forces with "SpaceX" to build a private space station - a magic floating space hotel. You have to be out of your mind if you think that's going to happen. So when the "ISS" is abandoned so will any further zero gravity research. You believe that "they" have been studying the effect of zero gravity on the human body so I wonder why you haven't noticed that nobody young has ever been into space. If "they" are serious about studying zero gravity then why are there no studies being done on someone young such as aged 21 or under?
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96.  
  97. That's just another thing you haven't noticed because you believe it's all real. There's no young "astronauts" but yet who do the "crew" of the alleged "ISS" spend all of their time talking to? It's not university students, engineers, adults, future space tourists or actual researchers. *It's CHILDREN. Young school-aged children.* That's who the "ISS crew" spend all of their time talking to (and never doing so with the Earth gracefully passing below). At any moment you can see a view of the Earth from the purported vantage of the "ISS" even while the "astronauts" conduct their (pre-recorded choose-your-own-adventure playback) "interviews". But combine these two things at the same time? No! And NEVER!
  98.  
  99.  
  100.  
  101.  
  102. The "ISS crew" are always "talking" to young children and the reason is because *the "ISS" is just a platform to impress whatever beliefs the lie system wants onto children who will become the next generation of belief controlled farmed animals.*
  103.  
  104.  
  105.  
  106.  
  107. I'm neither uneducated nor spastic though clearly you need me to be those things just so you can cling to your stupid infantile reality-based fantasy.
  108.  
  109.  
  110.  
  111.  
  112. You are not just wrong about this issue. You are catastrophically wrong. *And you are too stupid to know when to shut the f_kc up and pay attention to someone who has given this issue a lot more careful thought.* You monumental spazzy dum dum. All you can do is write ridicule and abuse and use your natural intelligence and imagination to invent "plausible explanations" to excuse the inexcusable. You should be ashamed of yourself.
  113.  
  114.  
  115.  
  116. __________________________________________
  117. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  118. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  119.  
  120. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  121. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  122.  
  123. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  124. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  125.  
  126. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  127. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement