Link from the competitor site?

Link from the competitor site?
I found that the competitor site has a broken link I can register but theres no other backlinks for this domain. It seems to be an old product that isnt around. Would a link like this be good for registering? Or should PBN links have more backlinks?
++++++++++++++
list of top cheapest host http://Listfreetop.pw

Top 200 best traffic exchange sites http://Listfreetop.pw

free link exchange sites list http://Listfreetop.pw
list of top ptc sites
list of top ptp sites
Listfreetop.pw
Listfreetop.pw
+++++++++++++++
Check the PA before you buy a redirect 301 domain for 1 backlink.. I wouldn't do it I think its safer and better to invest in high quality backlinks (like PBN)
It all depends on authority of a page linking to that abandoned website.

1. If it's a homepage link of a website that ranks in top 3 - it's definitely worth it.

2. If it's an internal page of a website that ranks in top 3 that is crawled by Google once in a year ... I would still get it! ( if it costs about 50 bucks.)

3. If it's more expensive domain or if your competitor isn't ranking to well - there's no practicability in buying that domain.

Unlike other link building strategies, in web 2.0 you are creating content and generating backlinks to your website. By which, you can have complete control over the anchor text, link type, number of backlinks, etc.

Whenever you want to remove or modify the link placements, you can do it at any time. You don’t require another person to involve in this to place, edit or remove links.

# No limit on the number of links

You can publish a limitless number of posts with any content length. Hence, you can have no limit on the number of backlinks. You can get backlinks from every authority web 2.0 sites to your commercial page or website. Every quality backlinks will have a greater effect in gaining your domain authority and finally, ranking improvement.

Do Web 2.0 falls under Gray-Hat SEO Technique?

Pewdiepie is the biggest success story on the YouTube platform. When he made a video showing some of the absurd aspects of Fiverr it led to a WSJ investigation which "uncovered" a pattern of anti-semitism. And yet one of the reporters who worked on that story wrote far more offensive and anti-semetic tweets. The hypocrisy of the hit job didn't matter. They still were able to go after Pewdiepie's ad relationships to cut him off from Disney's Maker Studios & the premium tier of YouTube ads.

The fact that he is an individual with broad reach means he'll still be fine economically, but many other publishers would quickly end up in a death spiral from the above sequence.
If it can happen to a leading player in a closed ecosystem then the risk to smaller players is even greater.
In some emerging markets Facebook effectively *is* the Internet.
The Decline of Exact Match Domains

Domains have been so devalued (from an SEO perspective) that some names like PaydayLoans.net sell for about $3,000 at auction.
$3,000 can sound like a lot to someone with no money, but names like that were going for 6 figures at their peak.
Professional domain sellers participate in the domain auctions on sites like NameJet & SnapNames. Big keywords like [payday loans] in core trusted extensions are not missed. So if the 98% decline in price were an anomaly, at least one of them would have bid more in that auction.
Why did exact match domains fall so hard? In part because Google shifted from scoring the web based on links to considering things like brand awareness in rankings. And it is very hard to run a large brand-oriented ad campaign promoting a generically descriptive domain name. Sure there are a few exceptions like Cars.com & Hotels.com, but if you watch much TV you'll see a lot more ads associated with businesses that are not built on generically descriptive domain names.
Not all domains have fallen quite that hard in price, but the more into the tail you go the less the domain acts as a memorable differentiator. If the barrier to entry increases, then the justification for spending a lot on a domain name as part of a go to market strategy makes less sense.
Brandable Names Also Lost Value

Arguably EMDs have lost more value than brandable domain names, but even brandable names have sharply slid.
If you go back a decade or two tech startups would secure their name (say Snap.com or Monster.com or such) & then try to build a business on it.
But in the current marketplace with there being many paths to market, some startups don't even have a domain name at launch, but begin as iPhone or Android apps.
Now people try to create success on a good enough, but cheap domain name & then as success comes they buy a better domain name.
Jelly was recently acquired by Pinterest. Rather than buying jelly.com they were still using AskJelly.com for their core site & Jelly.co for their blog.
As long as domain redirects work, there's no reason to spend heavily on a domain name for a highly speculative new project.
Rather than spending 6 figures on a domain name & then seeing if there is market fit, it is far more common to launch a site on something like getapp.com, joinapp.com, app.io, app.co, businessnameapp.com, etc.
fruitfulads.com
make money legit online
newsvzla.cf
domain price
koddos.net
www.listia.com
trendtraxpro.com