Power Supply

other = 2373
modern = 1140
sol = 2702
anemo = 4872
hydro = 11183
nuke = 7031
boomair = 40375
oil = 51170
coal = 44473
biomass = 11111


result = other + modern + sol + anemo + hydro + nuke + boomair + oil + coal + biomass -- full source list

money = biomass + boomair + oil + coal -- bad source list

safe = other + modern + sol + anemo + hydro + nuke -- good source list.



permoney = money / result
print("Good stuff: "..money.." / "..result)
print("Percent: "..permoney)

persafe = safe / result
print("Safe science CRAP: "..safe.." / "..result)


--lua.org/demo.html
--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_efficiency
--https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-consumption

--Also, did it in a hurry, thus really crappy. lol.
--Also also, did this because wanted to post on a comment on a video that has nothing to do with this LOL
--https://youtu.be/_--LvdAHfVo
--ALSO ALSO ALSO pastebin comments are kinda cool.

--[[
​ @Redacted
... ehh even if they did, from my knowledge now that i am using 5% brain, uhh. I *think* they mostly just release something akin to shockwaves of heat from the stored energy....

OH! also had a bit of fun lol:
https://pastebin.com/P9JjpZJ8
So...  I looked into it, and most energy unsurprisingly doesn't come from where people want it to.
... although i was kinda surprised that nuclear was as uhmmm.... "pathetic" as it is lol. Then again this chart also accounts for inefficiency and may include profit/loss measures so... eh. Was hoping for source... and only sources. oh well, already did it --
now then, assuming the site i found is atleast decently reliable, then 77% of power comes from natural gas, oil, and coal. other 33 comes from literally everything else in the list -- technically i probably could have added traditional biomass to the 'main source' category, but it both seems unfair, and also, i'd like to think burning wood is not going to be a giant problem.
...
sigh.
albeit, wood is a decent bit carbon, and heat added for burning just makes it burn off the carbon into CO2  soooo eh.
when biomass is added into the bad list, its 83% bad power.

onto.. the real topic... siiighhh. maybe i would be good at essays, i just needed something to complain about XD
Energy Potential, and / or Fuel efficiency.

Li-Ion, according to google lol, has
0.36–0.875 MJ/kg
Lets seeeeee here... Hydrogen, with wikipedia stating to be the most 'compacted' fuel, I guess, at an astounding
~130MJ/kg
Albeit, hydrogen is an utter pain in the oxygen to carry around, so why not some more wikipedia pain because I'm too tired to find a better source and... this is the youtube comment section, I don't really care that much --
VEGTABLE OIL????????
37.7MJ/kg, if however its at 9kcal/g.. oh. the hopes of running my car on carrots have been crunched.

Anyway, Standard E91 gas comes out to be:
~47MJ/kg
compared to Li-Ion's range of .36-.875MJ/kg, yeah gas is far more space efficient, which literally makes it more fuel efficient. (because: more powerful at a lesser dose. The giant batteries covering the bottom of the car change the weight... yaknow. Just a tad. Gas tank is far less heavy. I'd bet the reason of the range with lithium is how Li-Ion does cool stuff at low battery. I do wonder why gas hasn't been thoroughly tested yet though ]]--