Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2017-02-11 1915 +Agent Ice
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bh4XNFjgv0&lc=z12kvxxqszn3urp0223rzdiwfwyejxlge04
- https://pastebin.com/NSvdhcvB
- __
- +Agent Ice __ Saying I have left something out does not necessarily make it so. The point you are making about _"the event could have been faked and recorded to be used as propaganda"_ falls under "reason two" which is covered by the *"fallacy of the conspiracy theorist"*. How so? _Read on_..
- First of all - the *meaning* for each of the "oddities" and "anomalies" you point out are entirely a *subjective interpretation*. It is *not* clear that those people you mention were "directing" the event. Certainly - a story can be invented where those people are "directing the event" and if you want to believe that story then it becomes difficult to resist because you have convinced yourself of its reality.
- (There is no "sufficient proof" of those people "directing the event". Some have suggested that's what you can see in the footage and your imagination has filled in the blanks.)
- We can assign meaning - _*where there is no meaning*_ - to anything if we want it strongly enough. I have made that mistake myself in the past until I recognised and corrected it. That's why we need "sufficient proof" before we make claims - otherwise we are just expressing our pre-existing belief bias.
- Secondly - If the event had been faked for the purposes of propaganda then footage of the car hitting people *could also have been faked* - _unless you suggest that's impossible?_
- Showing footage of people getting hit by the car *would have a far greater propaganda effect* don't you think? Perhaps you don't agree that it would but it doesn't matter because the explanation as to *why such footage was not shown* is covered by *"reason three"* - which I wrote about in the accompanying Google Plus post.
- I think you watched the entire presentation but I am not so sure you read the accompanying Google Plus post. If you didn't - a link to that post has been pinned at the top of the comments section and can also be found in the video's description box. "Reason three" is what it's all about.
- Finally - I did not claim YouTube removed the videos "Peekay" posted. Rather - I pointed out that the clip I had used had been removed from YouTube - *as in you cannot find it there any more* - which is why they are not listed in the "Relevant Links" section. Perhaps I should have used "taken down [by Peekay]" instead of simply "removed".
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
