Lesta

8 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-30 0545 +Turgeon B. Mackafin

Oct 29th, 2016
92
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.14 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-30 0545 +Turgeon B. Mackafin
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acsyb0Krk1Y&google_comment_id=z13oils5aleycbyuj222fjdhqmnkctuyw04
  3. https://pastebin.com/NNZvQFTJ
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Turgeon B. Mackafin __ Of course you'd call it "childish" because you are *projecting* again. Remember - you're the guy who *casually* asserted that "anti-gravity" existed and then demanded proof for "airplanes" (lolz).
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10. *I utterly and thoroughly and comprehensively reject your worthless characterisation and misrepresentation of my position and ideas*.
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. Wow! You are dumb as f_kc.
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18. *You have also quoted me out of context you rat*.
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22. Your LOW IQ (you either have a low IQ or you are *thoroughly dishonest*) is preventing you from understanding SIMPLE things.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26. The FULL quote - including the context YOU REMOVED you f_kcing charlatan is as follows (the first paragraph is needed to understand the second - THEN it becomes clear you dummy):
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30. ____
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34. *But if you no longer believe me based on trust then my ability to lie to you becomes diminished. Furthermore - next time you might demand sufficient proof for a claim I make. Next time you might know to ask for some kind of proof that necessarily proves the claim*.
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38. *A person who intends to lie to others is not motivated to do that. Such a person is motivated to do the opposite for everything. Even those things which are true and real*.
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42. ____
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. The FIRST PARAGRAPH is NEEDED to understand the SECOND PARAGRAPH you worthless spastic. It is only unclear if you DON'T READ AND UNDERSTAND WHAT COMES BEFORE IT.
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50. You are too stupid to understand what it means so you dismiss it as "word salad". You f_kcing retard.
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. 1) I am saying that withholding sufficient proof is what FORCES a person to believe WHOLLY on trust.
  55.  
  56.  
  57.  
  58. 2) If you start providing sufficient proof then a person IS NO LONGER WHOLLY DEPENDENT ON TRUST.
  59.  
  60.  
  61.  
  62. 3) But a person who is lying NEEDS to be believed WHOLLY ON TRUST and so a person who is lying as a strategy WILL NOT PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR A PERSON TO BE FREE FROM HAVING TO TRUST.
  63.  
  64.  
  65.  
  66. In other words - if sufficient proof for something TRUE exists it will still not be provided because when it is provided there can arise an expectation to receive it for other things - potentially false things.
  67.  
  68.  
  69.  
  70. F_kc! Even that is going to whiz over your head.
  71.  
  72.  
  73.  
  74. *You simply do not have the intellect nor the wit for this endeavour*. You are not giving a "critique" like you think you are. You're objecting to things you have not understood. That is why you are so easily thinking of it as something it is not.
  75.  
  76.  
  77.  
  78. Give up and go away.
  79.  
  80.  
  81. ______________________________________________________________
  82. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  83.  
  84. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  85. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  86.  
  87. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  88. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  89.  
  90. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  91. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  92.  
  93. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  94. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  95.  
  96. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  97. What exists - exists to always exist.
  98. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment