Remember when Sargon said to Woes the future didn't matter because he'd be dead? But now he is the Crusader. We call this tactical nihilism, this is what Metokur is talking about. I also laughed at Sargon saying, essentially "if I dont know about something. it's just another echo chamber" when every criticism of Sargon is met with some variation of salt-right. We never have to worry about Skeptics respondiong to our content, but you guys have to care about us replying to yours. Who has the echo chamber?

And Jim is right you will need a party line and goals above self-seeking individual members. Which they are expected to promote even at the expense of promoting what they want. Otherwise you end up as the Libertarian party which fights amongst itself between left and right factions more than their enemies. Libertarians dont even agree on what Libertariarnism means and accomplish nothing. Yet they claim a "definition" will save them? As if people dont disagree over that. Liberals never agree on what true freedom is. Sargon's own chat called him out for being a 'bake the cake' guy, so clearly a definition isnt enough and still up for interpretation.

You can barely explain your way out of this to one another. Your examples of standard definitions are never seen as a sufficient party line. Nobody is using these terms incorrectly, you're just obtuse.

Louis talking about the Constitution is proof of this, everybody just uses the Constitution to justify something rather than defer to any inherent meaning to it. The Originalists lost, the definitions within the Constitution werent enough. It is just a piece of paper at this point. And that is why Spencer said it was a piece of paper.