Clips

I dont think this video is that unfair, he talked about censorship. I mean, it's Carl pretending he is smarter than he actually is and not realizing our problems make him and his look worse by comparison, but I only have 2 quibbles

The inherent contradictions being what did us in... this may just be me but inherent contradictions is usually a bs. It's usually just a gotcha which is based on some imagined contradiction, rarely a genuine criticism of any core foundation, and usually just a way to escape arguing over issues. For the life of me I havent a clue what Sargon refers to, but I'll be going through enough that it should get touched on

And him predicting the purity spiral. The guy who often seems to try and claim we arent being true to our principles (according to him) is also infamous for saying we'll let our principles destroy ourselves. Really this is just Carl's motivated reasoning

I mean, you can say that, but like my Uncle who predicted a recession for 10 years and claimed vindication when it finally hit, it's pretty silly. It's normal for divisions to form after massive failure, that isnt a purity spiral. The chief argument which occurred, and hardly split the AltRight since most people, not occdissent who you cite but he's the minority, was over not being purity-obsessed morons and caring about optics as the minority of natsoc there really sunk us at UTR. Yes, the major debate was the opposite of purity spiraling, arguing that purity was overrated. To call these things purity spiraling is to say any group which rethinks things or loses cohesion after failure is purity spiraling

Really, this is what Carl has always tried. A lot of narrative crafting, relying on a captive and gullible audience to fluff him, and generally changing with the seasons as it suits him, with those usually being pretty shallow and glib. Not bad tactics, and most people who have dealt with him tended to be unaware of his content and him more broadly

>allergic to competing ideas

like many things, projection. You shy away from these ideas, or criticisms of your belief in liberalism as a universal, or people pointing out you're pursuing a lot of this on faith alone. We come to your videos to criticize you, you claim we are obsessed after all, we want to debate you, we challenge what you say, and generally we see contradictory ideas every day on the left and right. Really this is based on us not sharing in your faith, when we have no reason to since you never address the racial issues head on, flip flop on them, have fared poorly in most direct confrontations, and duck the exact question Allsup asked you. And you seem to have almost read a single book or philosopher, which is like your harry potter while neglecting his use of the Christian tradition as a bedrock and the fact he spoke to a homogeneous society while owning stock in slave companies. And ignoring MIll being even more racialist than Locke, and having better liberal credentials I may add.