Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Nov 13th, 2024
97
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 33.39 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Introduction
  2.  
  3. This document is the result of a multi-year, internal investigation into the subjects of
  4. Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), Technologies of Unknown Origin (TUO), and Non-
  5. Human Intelligence (NHI). This investigation was undertaken in response to urgent and credible
  6. threats to the public good and safety of the United States of America — and provided to Congress
  7. through the UAP whistleblower mechanisms established by the FY23 National Defense
  8. Authorization Act, and the FY23 National Intelligence Authorization Act. The data consulted
  9. during this investigation, and summarized in this report, originate from non-public data held
  10. within the Executive Branch of the United States Government (USG). The author obtained
  11. access to this information while pursuing their lawful duties as an employee of the Department
  12. of Defense. This public version of the author’s report was reviewed and approved for public
  13. release by the Department of State, Bureau of Global Public Affairs. —
  14.  
  15. The results of this investigation are deeply disturbing. Elements of the U.S. Executive Branch .
  16. "have conspired to prevent the U.S. Legislative Branch from exercising its lawful powers of
  17. governance with respect to the UAP, TUO, and NHI issues. The information provided by the
  18. author strongly suggests that the U.S. Executive Branch has been managing UAP/NHI issues
  19. without Congressional knowledge, oversight, or authorization for some time, quite possibly
  20. decades. This criminal conspiracy keeps the elected government of the United States and its
  21.  
  22. citizens ignorant to profound discoveries and dire threats originating from the existence of UAP,
  23. NHI, and their technologies.
  24.  
  25. Unambiguous evidence demonstrating the reality of UAP, NHI, and’ TUO has been made
  26. available to Congress by multiple, independent UAP whistleblowers. This document is but one
  27. item of evidence brought to Congress, much more exists and hopefully will be made available. In
  28. this public version of the report, information is organized into seven categories of evidence,
  29. including: an Unacknowledged Special Access Program (uSAP); Imagery Intelligence (IMINT);
  30. human intelligence (HUMINT); signals intelligence (SIGINT); USG bureaucratic records; USG
  31.  
  32. historical records; and other sensitive sources. All information in this report is derived from
  33. access to non-public information. —
  34.  
  35. Section 1: Unacknowledged Special Access Program — IMMACULATE
  36. CONSTELLATION
  37.  
  38. IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION is an Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP)
  39. established following the public disclosure of the AATIP/AAWSAP programs by Luis Elizondo
  40. in 2017. Upon disclosure to Congress, it was determined that this USAP and its collateral
  41. information have not been lawfully reported to Congreés.
  42.  
  43. IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION’s primary mission is collecting imagery intelligence on
  44. Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and ARV/RV (Reproduction Vehicles) utilizing tasked
  45. and untasked U.S. military-intelligence resources. As part of a network of SAPs linked to Non-
  46. Human Intelligence (NHI) and UAP technologies, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION acts as
  47. a nexus for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating intelligence on the activities, capabilities,
  48. and locations of anomalous aerospace.threats that originate from foreign or unidentified sources.
  49. The intelligence within the IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION program primarily consists of —
  50. high-quality Imagery Intelligence (MINT) and collateral Measurement and Signatures
  51. Intelligence (MASINT) of UAPs and ARV/RVs within Earth’s atmosphere. The collection
  52. platforms involved are a blend of tasked and untasked capabilities in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), the
  53. upper atmosphere, military and civilian aviation altitudes and maritime environments.
  54. IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION pays particular attention to anomalous aerospace
  55. platforms that have been developed through the study or acquisition of technologies of unknown
  56. origin. by foreign nations or unknown entities. UAP and ARV/RV signatures and preferred
  57. operating areas are known to the program, enabling a degree of strategic awareness and warning.
  58. Finally, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION shows that UAP and ARV/RVs are operating
  59. around the globe, often in close proximity to sensitive foreign assets and locations.
  60.  
  61. The categorization of IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION as a 'parent' USAP, with various
  62. ‘child’ SAPs under its umbrella, indicates a high level of compartmentalization and secrecy. In
  63. effect, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION serves as a central or 'parent' USAP that
  64. consolidates observations of UAP and ARV activities detected by tasked and untasked collection
  65. platforms. Sophisticated internal information security controls are a major part of the
  66. IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION program, which enforces compartmentalization by
  67.  
  68. detecting, quarantining, and transferring UAP and RV imagery collection incidents before they
  69. are circulated within the Military Intelligence Enterprise.
  70.  
  71. In conclusion, IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION shows that the USG is not only aware of
  72. UAPs and TUO, but also foreign state efforts to replicate UAP and TUO capabilities. The data
  73. within IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION reveals the capacity of the U.S. Armed Services
  74. and Military Intelligence Community to detect, track, identify, and engage ariomalous
  75. transmedium platforms. IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION also demonstrates the extant
  76. capability to detect, quarantine, and transfer UAP and RV collection incidents before they are
  77. observed and circulated within the Military Intelligence Enterprise, partially explaining why
  78. many otherwise cleared members of the military and IC are unaware of UAP activities. Finally,
  79. the existence of IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION provides verifiable evidence of the witting
  80. participation by elements of the U.S. Armed Services, Defense Civil Service, and the
  81.  
  82. Intelligence Community in a global surveillance and reconnaissance mission tasked with
  83. monitoring UAPs and ARV/RVs.
  84.  
  85. Section 2: USG Imagery Intelligence
  86.  
  87. The USG maintains Imagery Intelligence (MINT) databases accessible to personnel with
  88. appropriate security clearances and mission need. These databases are scattered across various
  89. organizations and services, leading to a fragmented ownership structure. This dispersion
  90. complicates the timely and comprehensive gathering of IMINT related to Unidentified Aerial
  91. Phenomena (UAPs). Control over access to these datasets primarily reside with the Military
  92.  
  93. Intelligence Enterprise, the Combatant Commands, the Armed Services, and individual Program
  94. Managers.
  95.  
  96. The IMINT collected from datasets available to the DoD, and reviewed for this report, provide
  97. compelling evidence for UAP which defy prosaic explanations. There is a large number of
  98. unique imagery sensors available to the U.S. military and intelligence community including:
  99. Infrared (IR)/Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR), Full Motion Video (FMV), Thermal, and Still
  100. Photography. The multitude of wavelengths collected by these sensors have captured. UAP
  101. characteristics that are difficult or impossible to observe with the human eye alone. Subtle
  102. atmospheric effects associated with UAPs are visible through the sensors employed by the U.S.
  103. military and intelligence agencies, enabling unique analytic techniques. The verifiable chain of
  104. custody for UAP IMINT collected by U.S. military assets ensures a high level of confidence in
  105. the accuracy and integrity of the data gathered. The following examples are presented:
  106.  
  107. CENTCOM Cuboid Formation of Metallic Orbs: On USG networks, there exists daytime-
  108. FMV and daytime-FLIR footage of a formation of ~12 metallic orbs skimming the ocean surface
  109. at high-speed before dispersing in multiple directions. The rapid and agile maneuvering of the
  110. metallic orbs were incompatible with known aerospace vehicles and were between 3-6 meters in
  111. diameter. In the opening segment of this footage, the ~12 metallic orbs flew in a tight ‘cuboid’
  112. formation; the metallic orbs were in three vertical-square formations of ~4 orbs each, arranged in
  113. a three-pronged configuration, creating the illusion of a cube shape at distance: All the orbs were
  114. white-hot against the black-cold ocean in the FLIR footage, and each sphere created a feint
  115. atmospheric distortion both around itself and as a heat-shimmer ‘contrail’. The metallic orbs
  116. moved in this cube formation over the ocean for some time, before rapidly breaking formation as
  117. pairs. The sensor platform lost track of most of the metallic orbs as they ascended in altitude and
  118.  
  119. accelerated in speed but maintained observation on a pair of metallic orbs continuing the original
  120. trajectory of the larger formation.
  121.  
  122. CENTCOM Fast Mover Observed Transiting Over Sensitive Facilities: On USG networks,
  123. there exists FLIR footage of a small-medium oval UAP flying at high speed and low to the
  124. surface. The footage begins as routine surveillance of a sensitive coastal facility, when the oval
  125. UAP rapidly comes into frame as it flies above coastal facilities. The oval UAP then makes a
  126. rapid turn towards the ocean where it is tracked by the collection platform. The oval UAP i is
  127. tracked flying low over the open ocean at high speed before the track is lost.
  128.  
  129. INDOPACOM Intelligence Vessels Positioned to Collect on Reproduction Vehicle: On USG
  130.  
  131. _ networks, there exists Infrared footage of and imagery of a grouping of vessels engaged in
  132. SIGINT and MASINT collection at night in a specific area of the Pacific Ocean. In this footage,
  133. which was in close-proximity to the vessels, a large equilateral-triangle UAP suddenly appears
  134. directly over the ships, Three bright points are seen at each bottom corner of the UAP, which is
  135. observed to slowly rotate on its horizontal access. This rotation partially reveals a-horizontal bar
  136. of sweeping lights. Intelligence analysis associated with this event specifies that the equilateral-
  137. triangle is a Reproduction Vehicle (RV) and concludes that the vessels must have been aware of
  138. the RV’s frequent use of those coordinates, due to foreign pre-positioning of advanced collection
  139. assets at the exact time and place. After a brief period of hovering and slowly rotating
  140.  
  141. approximately 500-1000 meters above the ocean, the RV suddenly disappears, and the footage |
  142. ends.
  143.  
  144. INDOPACOM Equilateral Triangle UAP Tails Unwitting Vessel: On USG networks, there
  145. exists infrared footage of an equilateral-triangle UAP, approximately fighter-jet sized, hovering
  146. less than 200 meters above a vessel, in the night at a location in the Pacific. Intelligence analysis
  147. associated with this event specifies that the equilateral-triangle is an ARV/RV of unknown
  148. origin. The vessel gives no signs that it is aware of the ARV/RV maintaining altitude and bearing
  149. directly overhead. Two lights on the underside of the ARV/RV are visible, while a third is
  150. blocked from view due to a slightly upward angle of orientation.
  151.  
  152. INDOPACOM Large Disc Using Clouds as Concealment: On USG networks there exists
  153. OPIR footage of a large saucer shaped UAP emerging from within a dense cloud formation. The
  154. saucer registered black-hot against white-cold, with atmospheric disturbances caused by the
  155. saucer shaped UAP visible. The saucer was between 200-400 meters in circuniference.and
  156. displayed symmetrical concavities on the upper surface. The saucer shaped UAP emerges at a
  157. shallow angle travelling upwards towards the outer atmosphere. After breaking above the cloud
  158. cover, the saucer shaped UAP suddenly reverses its direction, descending partially back into the
  159. cloud cover, then accelerating rapidly out of frame and partially obscured by the could tops. This
  160. behavior was evasive in nature and implied that the saucer shaped UAP had become aware that it
  161. was under observation by a space-based collection platform.
  162.  
  163. INDOPACOM Boomerang UAP Observed by Pilot and Sensor Suite: On USG networks
  164. there exists FLIR footage of a swept-boomerang UAP maneuvering at an uncertain altitude at a
  165. location off the eastern coast of a country. The UAP is tracked against clouds by the sensor suite
  166. of the operating craft. The UAP is observed rapidly decelerating to a stationery hover, followed
  167. by the sudden emission of a sphere of light from the junction of the two ‘wings’ which expands
  168. to partially engulf the craft in a rotating sphere of light, at which point the available footage ends.
  169.  
  170. NORTHCOM Jellyfish UAP Crosses US-Mexico Border: On USG networks, there exists
  171. FLIR footage of an irregularly shaped UAP flying-across the southern border. The UAP __
  172. appeared in FLIR to be ‘mottled’ irregularly with hot/cold emissions and approximated a
  173. jellyfish or floating “brain’ with hanging appendages in appearance. The UAP flew against the
  174. wind with no visible means of propulsion, maintained an unnatural ‘rigidity’ in its movements
  175. and flight path, and maintained a comparatively low altitude to geographic features. In
  176. appearance and behavior, footage of this UAP violating the airspace of the southern border
  177. resembled the same class of UAPs observed near DoD facilities in Traq and Afghanistan. There
  178.  
  179. exists at least one compilation video of this class of UAP, sourced from DoD force protection
  180. assets and Theater ISR, which uses this footage as a point of comparison.
  181.  
  182. NORTHCOM Supersonic ‘Range Fouler’ Intercepts USN Fighter: On USG networks there
  183. exists FLIR footage and radar data of a supersonic UAP of uncertain characteristics conducting a
  184. head-on intercept of a USN fighter operating off the Eastern Seaboard. The UAP is observed
  185.  
  186. - emerging from a cloudbank at high-speed and approaching the USN aircraft head-on, rapidly
  187. passing over the left side of the cockpit. Radar data from this approach tracks the UAP on its
  188. approach towards the craft providing information on speed, heading, and elevation.
  189.  
  190. SOUTHCOM Tic-Tac Detected by Space Asset in Proximity of Vessel: On USG networks
  191. there exists OPIR imagery and MASINT of a Tic-Tac UAP transiting through an area of the
  192. Atlantic Ocean. The Tic-Tac maneuvers at an altitude at or near local cloud cover, and correlated
  193. electromagnetic signatures were collected by MASINT. In the available footage the Tic-Tac
  194. UAP transits rapidly through the field of regard as it transits the ocean. No observed reaction is
  195. seen to come from the vessel, but its proximity in time and space to the traj ectory of this VAP
  196. suggests foreknowledge of the UAP event by intelligence.
  197.  
  198. Section 3: Defense Human Intelligence Reporting
  199.  
  200. The USG maintains a database of intelligence collected by military personnel across a plethora .
  201. of topics, including UAP. These individual reports are considered “raw” because they have not
  202. undergone evaluation, corroboration, or contextualization into a finished analytical product by
  203. Military Intelligence Community analysts. A significant volume of reports documenting first-
  204. hand encounters with Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) or Unidentified Flying Objects
  205. (UFOs) by DoD personnel exists within defense HUMINT databases. Many of these UAP
  206. reports are filed by military aviators and pilots, as well as service members trained in foreign
  207. military intelligence collection activities, and often include photographic evidence and sensor
  208. data. When aggregated, these reports reveal significant information on UAP.
  209.  
  210. This section is-directly informed by reviewing over 400 defense HUMINT reports on encounters
  211. with UAPs/UFQOs by USG personnel spanning from 1991 to 2022. It must be noted that this
  212. dataset is not exhaustive — other HUMINT data sources exist which are omitted from this
  213. analysis. The defense HUMINT dataset summarized here highlights notable trends i in the
  214. reporting stream and are presented here along with specific examples.
  215.  
  216. Common UAP/UFO Shapes Observed in Defense HUMINT Dataset
  217.  
  218. From 1991 to 2022, the most common UAP shapes reported in this USG dataset were
  219. spheres/orbs, discs/saucers ovals/tic-tacs, triangles, boomerang/arrowhead, and irregular/organic.
  220. The Triangles/Boomerangs/Arrowhead shapes were by far the rarest and spheres the most
  221. common. Variations of morphology within these categories are present i.e. smooth spheres and
  222. spheres with protuberances; saucers without domes and saucers with domes; smooth ovals and
  223. ovals with surface structures; jellyfish or floating “brains” with appendages; and elongated
  224. triangles as well as equilateral triangles.
  225.  
  226. * . Sphere or Orb: Spheres were the most reported shape, with variations ranging from
  227. smooth featureless orbs to spheres with visible openings or appendages. These objects!
  228. prevalence suggests a possible standard in UAP design or function, capable of high
  229. maneuverability and speed. The diversity within the sphere category, spanning from
  230. simple, polished appearances to more complex structures with appendages, suggests a
  231. broad range of purposes or technologies unique to the platform’s mission and/or the
  232. originator.
  233.  
  234. ¢ Disc or Saucer: Saucer-shaped UAPs, reported with and without domes, were the
  235. second-most common shape reported. Flat saucers were reported as well, these being disc
  236. like objects without pronounced domes. Traditional bi-convex UAPs are also reported in
  237.  
  238. the data.
  239.  
  240. ¢ Oval or Tic-Tac: Oval-shaped UAPs were infrequently reported within the » dataset, and
  241. only after approximately 2003; these UAPs either maintained a uniform ‘egg-like’
  242. symmetry, occasionally tapered into a teardrop shape. Cylinders with convex ends (Tic- .
  243. Tacs) fall into this category, and occasionally featured visible protuberances on the ‘top’
  244. or ‘bottom’ of the otherwise uniform planform.
  245.  
  246. ¢ ‘Triangle: Triangles were among the rarest UAPs reported in the data. Most of these
  247. sightings were equilateral triangles, occasionally with vertical ‘stabilizers’ visible on the
  248. ‘top’ of the UAP. Elongated (isosceles) types were also reported, occasionally with the
  249. same vertical stabilizers observed on the equilateral type.
  250.  
  251. ¢ Boomerang or Arrowhead: Boomerangs and ‘Arrowhead’ shaped UAPs were also
  252.  
  253. among the rarest reported. The boomerang UAPs exhibited bilateral symmetry, with
  254. sweeping wings and a high aspect ratio. Arrowhead UAPs also showed bilateral .
  255. symmetry, but possessed tapered wings and a low aspect ratio, typically with highly
  256. swept leading edges.
  257.  
  258. « trregular or Organic: Irregularly shaped UAPs, those that defy simple geometric
  259. description, were among the rarest reported sightings. Shape-shifting UAPs also appear
  260. in the dataset, typically having a spherical or disc-like “base” form from which irregular
  261. geometries are seen to project. “Floating brain” or “jellyfish” UAPs are present as well,
  262. characterized by a central mass from which multiple “arms” or spars hang downward.
  263. Finally, combined shapes were also observed, including cubes within spheres, ringed
  264. saucers, and various rectangular and cuboid forms.
  265.  
  266. Common Observable Behaviors and Characteristics of UAP/UFO Shapes Observed in
  267. Defense HUMINT Dataset
  268.  
  269. Table 1: Sphere/Orb
  270.  
  271. Observable | Details
  272. Size — Sizes range from small objects to those several meters in diameter.
  273. Speed Capable of stationary hovering to rapid acceleration; speeds surpassing
  274.  
  275. jiconventional aircraft have been noted.
  276.  
  277. _| Often lack conventional signatures such as heat trails; electromagnetic
  278.  
  279. Signatures effects on military electronics reported.
  280.  
  281. Varied, with grey/metallic, greyish-blue, white/white-yellow, and
  282. Colors ; a
  283. red/orange-red being prevalent.
  284.  
  285. Ranges from completely smooth and reflective to having visible
  286.  
  287. Surface Details . .
  288. protuberances, appendages, concavities, and openings.
  289.  
  290. High maneuverability, including abrupt direction changes and the ability to
  291. Behaviors hover. Often observed to fly in complex geometrical formations and to
  292. operate in tandem.
  293.  
  294. Atmospheric Occasional disturbances in cloud formations and ‘heatwave’ contrails have
  295. Phenomena been reported.
  296.  
  297. Biological Effects Close observers reported feelings of unease, and of electronic device
  298. malfunctions.
  299.  
  300. Table 2: Disc/Saucer
  301.  
  302. | Observable | Details |
  303. ISize Generally, range from a few meters to over 20 meters in diameter. |
  304. Speed Exhibits capabilities for both hovering and high-speed flight, often making
  305.  
  306. sudden sprints.
  307.  
  308. : Radar detection varies, visual sightings more common. Some reports
  309. Signatures . .
  310. include'a humming sound.
  311.  
  312. Metallic silver or gray is common, though some have been reported as
  313. Colors
  314. emitting light or changing color.
  315.  
  316. : }Variations include smooth, featureless surfaces to those with visible
  317. Surface Details
  318. domes or segmented panels.
  319.  
  320. Behaviors Sudden vertical ascents, hovering, and silent operation. Some reports
  321. __|lindicate the ability to become invisible or blend into the sky.
  322. Unique Emissions |Instances of electromagnetic interference in nearby devices and vehicles. |
  323.  
  324. Atmospheric Visual disturbances, such as shimmering air or sudden fog formation.
  325. (Phenomena :
  326.  
  327. Table 3: Oval/Tic-Tac
  328.  
  329. Observable | Details
  330. Size Lengths typically from 6 to 40 meters, maintaining proportional width and
  331. height.
  332. Speed High-speed travel and instant acceleration have been frequently reported, with
  333. pee no sonic boom.
  334. [Signatures [Visual identification often notes a lack of contrail. |
  335. IColors || White or silver. |
  336. Surface Uniformly smooth surface, with occasional reports of protuberances that could
  337. Details be sensors, propulsion elements, weapons, or unknown technology.
  338.  
  339. : Observed ability to hover and then accelerate suddenly. Some encounters
  340. Behaviors
  341. describe them maintaining stable positions despite high winds.
  342.  
  343. Table 4: Triangular
  344.  
  345. | Observable | Details . |
  346. [Size [Medium to large sized, ranging from F-16 to. football-field size. |
  347. Speed Capable of slow, precise movement as well as rapid acceleration to speeds
  348.  
  349. beyond conventional aircraft,
  350.  
  351. . Often reported to emit'a soft, humming sound; may affect electronic devices
  352. Signatures
  353. within a certain proximity.
  354.  
  355. ||Black or dark gray, sometimes with white lights at the corners and a central red
  356. Colors « ”
  357. light; reports of “twinkling” stars across surface.
  358.  
  359. | Observable |
  360.  
  361. Details
  362.  
  363. Surface Some have been described with visible surface textures, like panels or ridges,
  364. Details and occasionally stabilizers.
  365. : Hovering is common, as is silent flight. The ability to suddenly vanish or
  366. Behaviors
  367. accelerate rapidly is frequently reported.
  368. . ‘Triangular UAPs often emit focused beams of light. Toroidal light patterns are
  369. Unique
  370. car sometimes observed to emanate from a central point, leading to rapid
  371. Emissions
  372. acceleration or disappearance.
  373. or Long-term psychological effects, such as anxiety or insomnia, have been noted,
  374. Biological ‘ ’
  375. alongside the feeling of ‘being watched’ or shared awareness with the triangle
  376. Effects
  377. UAP.
  378. Table 5:Boomerang/Arrowhead
  379. | Observable | Details |
  380. Size Wingspans can exceed 30 meters, especially for boomerang-shaped UAPs.
  381. Arrowheads typically range from F-16 size to slightly larger,
  382.  
  383. \Speed Exhibits both gliding at low speeds and the capacity for high- Speed sgt |
  384.  
  385. Signatures Visual sightings often note a slow, silent flight profile. |
  386.  
  387. Typically dark, blending with the night sky, though some reports include
  388.  
  389. Colors glowing edges or tips.
  390. Surface Smooth surfaces with.a notable aerodynamic design; the arrowhead types show
  391. Details more angular features.
  392. Behaviors [Known for silent operation and the ability to execute tight turns.
  393.  
  394. . Seen to emit a spherical ‘ball’ of light from the centerline, which partially
  395. Unique he UAP duri ng ele tic interf ith
  396. Emissions envelops the UAP during maneuvers, causing electromagnetic interference wit
  397.  
  398. local technologies.
  399.  
  400. Table 6: Irregular/Organic
  401.  
  402. Observable | Details |
  403. Size: Highly variable, from small, compact forms to larger, more sprawling
  404. structures.
  405. Movements range from slow drifting to rapid acceleration, often
  406. Speed
  407. unpredictable.
  408. . Some reports include unusual sounds or the absence of expected
  409. Signatures oo ;
  410. aerodynamic noise; electromagnetic effects are common.
  411. Often described with bioluminescent qualities or shifting colors, particularly
  412. Colors it . tt et
  413. for "floating-brain" or jellyfish types.
  414. Surface Details Descriptions vary widely, from smooth, fluid-like surfaces to complex,
  415. articulated structures.
  416.  
  417. | Observable » | Details
  418.  
  419. Demonstrates a wide range of behaviors, from controlled maneuvering to
  420. erratic patterns of movement. Shape-shifting abilities have been reported. -
  421.  
  422. wa, Observations include physical sensations of warmth or cold, unexplained
  423. Biological Effects ; ; .
  424. smells (e.g., ozone), and psychological distress.
  425.  
  426. Unique The floating-brain/jellyfish UAPs occasionally exhibit ‘patterned
  427.  
  428. Emissions luminescence or fluctuating lights/colors (typically only visible in the
  429. higher-end of the electromagnetic spectrum).
  430.  
  431. Behaviors
  432.  
  433. Atmospheric Sudden temperature drops, and the appearance of clouds have been reported.
  434. Phenomena
  435.  
  436. Examples of Defense HUMINT Reports on UAP:
  437.  
  438. Close Encounter by CVN Flight Deck Personnel: While on active duty in the Pacific, flight
  439.  
  440. . deck personnel working night duty experienced a close encounter with a spherical UAP of
  441. medium-large size. On-duty flight deck crew observed a small orange-red sphere maneuvering at
  442. high altitude above the CVN. Shortly after first observation, the UAP rapidly descended from
  443. high altitude to a position directly above the flight deck of the CVN (height approximately 100-
  444. 200 yards). The UAP maintained altitude and matched speed with the underway CVN for an
  445. uncertain period; observing personnel reported altered perceptions of time during the close
  446. encounter. The UAPs appeared to emit a soft orange-red light which, bizarrely, did no illuminate
  447. the ocean or the flight deck of the CVN despite the visual appearance of intense luminosity. The
  448. ‘surface of the UAP was observed to be dynamic, ‘roiling like the surface of the sun’. The UAP
  449. took no reported actions during the encounter, only maintaining a close-in proximity to the CVN.
  450. _ After an uncertain period, the UAP suddenly shot into the air, disappearing at a point high above
  451. the CVN. Observing personnel felt as if they ‘snapped out of a trance’ and sense of profound
  452. unease. The incident report concludes with noting that the CVN had not responded in any way to
  453. what was perceived as a hostile interception by the UAP.
  454.  
  455. Metallic Orbs Intercept F-22 on CONUS Air Surveillance and Control Mission: While
  456. performing a routine Airspace Surveillance and Control Mission in the Eastern Air Defense
  457. Sector, an F-22 fighter observed multiple UAP contacts at-mission-altitude. Moving to intercept,
  458. the F-22 pilot noted multiple metallic orbs — slightly smaller than a sedan — hovering in place.
  459. Upon vectoring towards the UAPs, a smaller formation of the metallic orbs accelerated at rapid
  460. speed towards the F-22, which was unable to establish radar locks on the presumed-hostile
  461. UAPs. The F-22 broke trajectory and attempted to evade but was intercepted and boxed in by’
  462. approximately 3-6 UAPs. One UAP maneuvered in proximity (>12 meters) to the area directly
  463. starboard of the cockpit; there the UAP established a rigid spatial relationship with the F-22,
  464. maintaining its exact position and orientation parallel with the F-22’s cockpit despite multiple
  465.  
  466. evasive rolls and maneuvers. Surrounded by the presumed-hostile UAPs, the F-22 was forced out
  467. of the mission area under the escort of the UAP formation.
  468.  
  469. Perimeter of Sensitive Facility Breached by UAP: At a military airfield located on the Eastern
  470. Seaboard, ground personnel reported a lengthy, low-altitude intrusion late at night by a small,
  471. spherical UAP. The UAP displayed visual signature management, appearing as a blurry sphere
  472.  
  473. around which light was distorted or ‘bent’; this effect emanated outward from the central sphere,
  474. giving the appearance of a heat-haze or misty volume of distorted light. Ground personnel.
  475. reported eyestrain, headaches, and a feeling of unease or dread while observing this ‘dark
  476. sphere’. The UAP was first observed while slowly crossing the runway, moving in the direction
  477. of a sensitive area. Once across, the UAP hovered above a grouping of ground equipment, before
  478. floating further towards a building within the sensitive area. The UAP then floated the building
  479.  
  480. before suddenly disappearing. Ground personnel were uncertain of the length of the encounter,
  481. but estimated their observation lasted between 10 to 15 minutes.
  482.  
  483. Section 4: DoD Bureaucratic Records
  484.  
  485. Discrepancies found throughout the internal records of AARO and DoD interactions with
  486.  
  487. ’ Congress cast serious doubts on the integrity of the DoD's statements to the elected leaders of the
  488. United States Government. Extant transcripts held by DoD leadership show a pattern of
  489. trivialization, obfuscation, and outright denial of UAP data in what were intended to be highly
  490. classified, private, and transparent conversations with appropriate Congressional members. This
  491.  
  492. same behavior also prevents critical members of Congress from receiving an accurate assessment
  493. of the national security risks posed by UAPs.
  494.  
  495. Specific examples known to the author include: denying the existence of multiple
  496. Compartmented Access Programs (CAPs) owned by-a Military Intelligence Agency which
  497. directly related to the UAP mission; denying the existence of joint DoD/inter-department Special
  498. Access Programs (SAPs) directly related to the UAP mission and the study of TUO; and finally,
  499. the denial of the existence of IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION by DoD representatives to
  500. appropriate Congressional members and their staff.
  501.  
  502. Separately, additional internal records confirm the claims of Mr. Lue Elizondo regarding
  503. AATIP/AAWSAP’s mission, activities, and findings. Additional documents support the
  504. exceptional character and credibility of Mr. Elizondo, These non-public documents include
  505. letters of commendation, service award nominations, performance/promotion reviews, archived
  506. email chains, and AATIP/AAWSAP program briefings which directly corroborate the public
  507. statements of Mr. Elizondo. These records also provide additional insight into the activities of
  508. AATIP/AAWSAP, the evolution of the program’s findings, and its interactions with senior DoD
  509. leadership. Finally, these records provide insight into highly classified and suppressed areas of
  510.  
  511. scientific research and technology development, derived from the study and exploitation of UAP
  512. and NHI technologies.
  513.  
  514. Section 5: Restricted USG Historical Records
  515.  
  516. (G/00/162-78). This serial number corresponds to an official NSA report published in 1978. The
  517. existence and content of this report was verified by.accessing the appropriate intelligence
  518.  
  519. archives. The substance of the report concerns scientific research in the Soviet Union on the
  520.  
  521. topics of parapsychology, ‘psi,’ and biological effects of UAP on human beings. Additionally,
  522.  
  523. the existence of this reporting stream demonstrates that U.S. intelligence was explicitly tasked to °
  524. collect on foreign entities active in areas often relegated to the fringes of scientific research,
  525. including parapsychology and the biological effects of encounters with UAP. The fact that
  526. " significant intelligence resources were dedicated to understanding and exploiting information
  527. related to UAPs and NHIs highlights a strategic commitment to understanding the full scope of
  528.  
  529. -UAP, NHL and TUO. These and other classified accounts provide a rare public glimpse reveal
  530. the contours of a secretive, decades-long competition between major terrestrial powers to collect,
  531. exploit, and field novel technologies derived from the study of UAP and NHI.
  532.  
  533. Section 6: Signals Intelligence
  534.  
  535. A substantial body of sensitive signals intelligence collected from peer and near-peer countries
  536. demonstrate foreign awareness of UAP events occurring over their sensitive military and
  537. intelligence facilities — including nuclear weapons facilities. Due to the exceptionally sensitive
  538. nature of the sources and methods involved, only general conclusions are provided here:
  539. e Foreign countries are known to have observed UAPs whose signatures and behaviors
  540. correlate to those observed by the United States.
  541. e These UAP events are treated by the security apparatuses of each state as serious national
  542. security threats due to VAP in proximity to sensitive military and intelligence facilities.
  543. ¢ These facilities are most often associated with aerospace defense, strategic deterrence,
  544. and military-sponsored scientific research and development.
  545. e On multiple occasions, each of these nations have attermpted to intercept and shoot down
  546. UAPs violating their territorial airspace, and the airspace over sensitive facilities.
  547. e Foreign countries have internal organizations dedicated to studying the ambiguous threat
  548. posed by UAPs, deducing scientific principles through observing UAP, and the careful
  549. management of public perceptions of the UAP issue.
  550.  
  551. Section 7: Sensitive Sources
  552.  
  553. From mouth to ear.
  554.  
  555. VI. Conclusion
  556.  
  557. The official disclosure of the existence of Non-Human Intelligences (NHIs) and their presence
  558. on Earth is a pivotal moment in human history. The nature of this information is of such
  559. incomparable relevance to the public good that it demands to be shared. Some may object and
  560. say that disclosure at this time poses too many risks. To them it must be said that we will never
  561. be able to predict how individuals, families, communities, and nations will react to revelations of
  562. such magnitude. Moving forward, we must guard against the lure of authoritarian solutions
  563. justified by expediency and appeals to national security. The Good in humanity will always
  564. triumph through time, and it is in moments of crisis that our capacities for achieving the
  565. extraordinary are discovered. Be not afraid.
  566.  
  567. Scientia Igne Probata; Veritas Per Fidem .
  568.  
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement