Update to cv19 injection concerns

Though I posted the original comment today, I wrote it many months ago. In the time since, vaccine adverse event reporting systems have registered unprecedented signals of injury and death, much of which can be plausibly explained by the concerns I had described. Recently, even more vital information has come to light regarding many safety issues with these injections that was not known at the time of writing the original post.

It is profoundly important you also understand that:

Data from Pfizer’s trial and FOIA requests of Japanese biodistribution studies of the Pfizer vaccine in mice have demonstrated lipid-nanoparticles migrate more widely in the body than was originally thought. Lipid-nanoparticles were shown to travel to major organs in worrying amounts, with the highest concentration ending up in the ovaries of female recipients. This is reinforced by studies on the biodistribution of other mRNA vaccines containing lipid-nanoparticles, which conclude that mRNA distributes from the injection site to major organs via the lymphatic system, ultimately reaching general circulation, and quite worrisomely, even ending up in the brain (Bahl et al.). The European Medicines Agency assessment report for the Moderna vaccine also noted that mRNA could be detected in the brain following intramuscular administration.

Widespread biodistribution is doubly concerning given we now also know the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein is toxic, capable of causing significant vascular damage (Suzuki et al.). Spike protein alone, independent of the rest of the viral genome, was found sufficient to cause damage to endothelial cells (Lei et al.). While mRNA in the injections causes cells to express a modified version of the toxic SARS-CoV2 spike protein, changes were made only with the intention of provoking a stronger immune response, not remedying its toxicity. A 2021 paper by Suzuki and Gychka warns of potential long term consequences to both children and adults who received COVID-19 vaccines based on spike protein toxicity. Plausible mechanisms of injury matching reported side effects dictate that the modified spike protein should be considered toxic until proven otherwise. This means that, once lipid-nanoparticles carrying mRNA enter cells, potentially toxic spike protein is expressed in concerning areas of the body, causing blood clots, inflammation, and other problems. It is likely that spike protein breaks free from expressed cells, further circulating in the body and potentially causing even more injury. Perforation of the blood brain barrier is of particular concern, as a host of adverse neurological effects have been reported following injection. Though more confirmatory research needs to be performed, there are some indications, via a blood test called “D-dimer”, that micro clotting occurs in perhaps the majority of recipients.

Many of these concerns are echoed by the inventor of mRNA and DNA based vaccine technology, Dr Robert Malone, who has caused enormous controversy by emerging onto the public stage to openly discuss these issues. Dr Malone is currently facing censorship, with his role in the history of mRNA and DNA based drug and vaccine technology currently being actively erased from the internet. Despite these attempts to change history, Dr Malone’s role as progenitor of this technology can be verified by the scientific literature and patent filings. Harassment and disinformation campaigns have been waged against him for expressing concerns about the safety of Covid injections, as well as issues he has with breaches in medical ethics now occurring via unprecedented coercion-schemes seeking to achieve the highest possible levels of uptake in the general population.

Various governments’ adverse event data systems (US’s VAERS, UK’s Yellowcard, and Europe’s Eudravigilance) register unprecedented signals of injury and death. Independent analyses by Drs. Rose, Lawrie, and others have demonstrated a probable causal link between post marketing surveillance data and adverse outcomes, particularly injuries of a cardiologic, neurologic, hematologic, and immunologic nature. An analysis by Dr. Jessica Rose has demonstrated that the vaccine adverse event data system conforms to metrics used to establish statistical causality. Dr Tess Lawrie’s analysis of UK’s Yellowcard database has determined Covid injections are not fit for use in humans. Adverse event data can also be plausibly explained by the known mechanism of widespread biodistribution and spike protein toxicity.

Finally, an excellent paper by Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT has been published in ‘The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research’ called “Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against Covid-19”. In it, Seneff details the actual pathophysiology of many of the things I’ve mentioned, including ADE, spike protein toxicity, biodistribution, anaphylactic reaction, autoimmune disorders, and the risk of neurodegenerative (prion-like) diseases from the mRNA injections, among other problems.

Hope this additional info helped as well 👍