Further commentary on second half:

I'll elaborate on the second half just a little. We discussed organization structure, covering options in the full spectrum from having one dedicated node manager to trying to implement some kind of direct link between EVMavs snapshot votes and oDAO votes. The latter doesn't seem like it will be particularly popular with the Rocket Pool community, sounded like we're leaning towards having some sort of oDAO council, possibly still with a need for one person to have ultimate node operation responsibility.

But we also agreed that it sounds like the Rocket Pool community and oDAO are less interested in novel governance structure, and more interested in what skills and value we can provide to them. Had some discussion around how oDAO seats have often been given specifically as a reward of sorts to those who have already contributed greatly to the project, further emphasizing the need for us to provide value to them (defi? rocket school?).

We laid out a general goal of trying to get in touch with more oDAO members to hear what they're looking for in new members, generally to figure out what we need to prioritize in an application. Hopefully we can keep the discussion going throughout this next week! treebeard's notes are also good if anyone wants a topic to put some work into (⁠🚀│rocket-pool-odao⁠).