Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-02 0050 +Joe Boersema

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-02 0050 +Joe Boersema
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y__EDn5c_QU&lc=z13gtdvrvlzbwp5ar04cgtaoetqxjnyxygk
https://pastebin.com/MkSE9wyE
Orlando Shooting
__

+Joe Boersema __ Howdy. It is excellent that none of us are convicted for crimes we have not committed for no greater reason than having been seen smirking at an inappropriate moment. Of course - let us not forget that there are those who are indeed guilty of crimes but because their guilt cannot be proven they remain free to smirk all they please. I am sure you would agree that is an unfortunate situation.






You have written about several interesting things and I would like to discuss them with you (as time permits). But first - let us focus on the "duping delight". *The impression I get is that you are powerless to recognise duping delight because it could always be "something else"* (even when it is not). Can you ever recognise "duping delight"? It seems you cannot.






So rather than try to "prove" it to you (since you are closed to that possibility) let's instead simply pretend that what we see in the video is genuine duping delight. Of the many scenarios you have listed - which of them would then become more likely? How would your own interpretation of this event change if you knew that the gentleman in the video was lying? (Hypothetically speaking.)






__






P.S. You mentioned contacting "victims". There seems to be a growing trend for people to encourage "truthers" to "contact victims". *This is most unwise*. You will never find me doing that and I am instantly suspicious of all who do. *If an event is genuine then it is harassment*. If an event is fabricated then it will be characterised as "harassment" *and used as ammunition with which to shoot us point blank*.






There is no need to contact anyone. When you understand what I am "all about" you will realise that it is not about whether an event or claim is real or fake. (Each event is simply an object of fascination that gets our attention for a little while.) No position [real/fake/mixed] can be *"proven"* and genuinely "known". And there is a reason for that.






The reason is because *events and claims are being intentionally and systematically presented to us in a way that remains doubtable by intelligent people*. We are living in a lie system that presents truth to us *in the same form that a lie would need to take*. Because of this simple process the population is rendered powerless to recognise when lies are being presented as truth.






Would you not agree that a "government" (if you accept such things) would like to have the capability of lying to its population - at any moment and for any reason - about anything at all? Of course it would. And because of what I have just described _it is in a position to do that._ As desired or required. Meaningful change [dismantling the lie system] can only occur when enough people have managed to figure this out. It certainly won't happen by contacting "victims" or trying to "prove" an event did or did not happen etc.


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w